I know it’s a hot market so sellers can do whatever. But builders should still get a stager without such a strong affinity for colonialism cause this is not cute
Anyway when people ask me what they can do with a social science degree, I’m going to add, “not choose the racist decor items”.
Based on comments to my mood social observations #onhere, I hypothesize that white people hear Black people at some register that triggers their primal racism brain. It’s the only way to explain what people come up with.
I say, casually, “oh hey look at racist phrenology bust haha” and white people hear, “OMG LOOK AT THE KLAN’S RESURGENCE RIOT AT NOON”. Or something whereabouts there.
Y’all should look into that.
You don’t need to explain the deep inner workings of racism’s many levels. I assure you, I didn’t get this far by not knowing my whites far better than they know themselves. Calm down.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Another week and another "study" about how morning people are better than night people. I don't get what they're so pleased about. Ooh ooh look at your working harder for less before noon and not having any friends who will tell you that its annoying.
Maybe being a night person is how I contribute to the revolution. Have you ever thought about that??
"People who wake up early live longer!" Wow, 1.45 more years they have to wake before the sun. No thanks.
I've only watch The Holiday a million times. And the page references in THICK is just my kind of carrying on.
I read something once about how films signal that a (white) woman has lost her shit, e.g. ponytail and sweatpants = mental breakdown. This read of time and the fading of blonde is both a character study and plot device is something.
This is very good & very important new research on radicalized orgs and diversity canards.
Diversity Displays and Organizational Messaging: The Case of Historically Black Colleges and Universities - Oneya Okuwobi, Deborwah Faulk, Vincent J. Roscigno, 2021 journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.117…
Because "diversity" unilaterally and practically means introducing non-white people into majority white institutions/spaces, I have long been puzzled by HBCUs attempts at branding diversity.
As the authors point out, the issue is that HBCUs *are* the diversity and therefore do not fit into white logics of needing to be diversified. But a lot of resources and capital are attached to "Diversity" programming. How can a Black college procure those resources?
Considering the freak out about the kids part of this statement, I may need to explicate my draw the obvious implications for same-gender forces intimacy in the classroom.
That was the Dryfuss thing. Now to the original news item of Chua et al.
The reason professors at social reproduction institutions - the elite universities designed to reproduce elite status cultures - court the students as “friends” is because they’re courting the parents.
They are correct when they behave as if doing this kind of thing is a perk of the job. The institutions are built that way and implicitly managed that way. Court the young elites for favor with their elders. It’s a professional strategy.
The problem is multi-fold. The elites set the norms downstream. So the guy from grad school is trained in the ways of Harvard but ends up teaching at...not Harvard. That’s one problem.