From our high horse, we (investors) assume we'll spot tell-tale signs of an impending revenue growth slow-down.

That's not true.

[Thread]: Why its nearly impossible to predict when a company's growth will stall, the myths of soft landings, and market cap consequences
1/ The book "Stall Points" explains this concept perfectly.

We (investors) assume that we could spot the following to predict potential stall points:

- Revenue growth deceleration
- Gross margin compression
- Lack of business activity

None of these hold the answer.
2/ In fact, the reason why predicting stall points is impossible is because some co's do the EXACT OPPOSITE of what we think they should do.

Here's what I mean: Some businesses about to hit a stall point actually GROW revenues & margins!

Let's back this up with some data.
3/ The book reveals what companies did right before the stall point:

- 40% Increased Margins
- 14% Maintained Margins
- 45% Accelerated Revenue growth

That's nearly half of the data showing the opposite of what we'd expect.

How is that possible?
4/ The "Oh S**t" Conundrum

The reason revenues tend to increase before the stall lies in the "Oh S**t" Conundrum. Management, realizing they might miss expectations, expands revenues by:

- M&A
- Channel stuffing
- Asset sales

All in hopes to keep that growth going. And yet..
5/ In other words, a rapid acceleration in revenue growth should prompt initial caution, not excitement.

What should investors do? Verify that revenue growth came from organic/planned business activity.

Watch out for past organic growers shifting to M&A-hungry expansion.
6/ You know what else sucks? Stall points aren't gradual declines. They're cliff-falling collapses.

The book calls it "The Myth of Soft Landings"

Put simply, soft landings are rare and most companies exhibit a steep, sudden revenue growth drop-off.

Like Taleb's Turkey
7/ The Consequences of Stall Points

- 42% of stocks declined more than two years after initial stall
- 51% lost more than 75% of market cap post-stall
- 40% lost between 50-70% of market cap post-stall

Stall points offer delayed, but certain penalties.
8/ Some Lessons

What should you take from this thread? A few things:

- Pay attention to type of revenue growth (not all growth created equal)

- Assign low probability of success to turnaround stories (hard to regain growth)

- Cut losses quickly at first sign of stall point
9/ Conclusion

Go buy the book. Here's the link.

I'm having a hell of a good time reading, underlining, and re-reading parts I don't understand.

H/t @CliffordSosin for the recommendation.
amazon.com/Stall-Points-C…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Brandon Beylo

Brandon Beylo Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @marketplunger1

7 Jun
I've seen many folks complain that they haven't found great ideas lately (some even 1YR+).

That's just not true if you venture outside the US.

But that's scary.

Here's what you do: find simple businesses

For example, Stock Exchanges

THREAD: 6 Stock Exchange Ideas
1/ Why Stock Exchanges?

Stock Exchanges are simple business that don't change (too much) depending on geography.

Plus, they're predisposed to monopoly/network-effect benefits as more people use a specific exchange.

Also, exchanges are as old as the 17th century (Lindy).
2/ Hong Kong $HKEX/388

World's largest exchange by market cap and and listed companies.

Stats:

- 96% GM
- 73% EBIT margin
- Almost no share dilution
- HK gov't largest shareholder (don't want to see it fail)
- 30% ROC
- 40x Normalized Earnings
Read 9 tweets
20 May
1/ “We can have no finer role model. He was a value investor — a member of that eccentric tribe that believes it’s better to underpay than to overpay.”

This thread reveals the story of the greatest value investor you've never heard of.

The story of Floyd Odlum.

THREAD
2/ With a decent income from his job as a law clerk, Odlum started trading in the stock market. He initially saw the market as a rich, fertile ground for speculative profits. Far from his cemented legacy as a deep value investor.
3/ Yet like most beginning speculators, Odlum too paid his fair share of market tuition.

After losing all his $40,000 starting capital, Odlum retreated from the markets. One newspaper revealed it, “took [Odlum] a while to pay back that sum”.
Read 24 tweets
20 May
Some quick thoughts for new investors about writing up a new idea:

When I first started investing (and still sometimes do today) I wanted to write everything down about a stock.

Every data point on paper.

Yet this brain-dump removed the LEARNING from "learning the biz"...
The more I asked other investors about their processes, the more I realized they spend less time "data dumping" and more time deeply thinking.

I know, it sounds pithy.

But these are my favorite investors. What did they know that I didn't?

Answer: The power of compounding..
Here's what they (generally) do.

The best investors I know slowly accumulate knowledge on a company or industry (months, years, etc.).

Then, when a new idea surfaces, they leverage all that compounded knowledge and the actual act of writing the idea becomes effortless.
Read 5 tweets
13 May
There aren’t many investors compounding capital at double digits over the course of decades and those that do are already well known (i.e., that guy from Omaha). However, in a small office above a taco shop, a man did just that.

[THREAD]
Allan Mecham ran a hedge fund called Arlington Value who has demonstrated the advantage in simplicity, long-term thinking, and the power of compounding.

Arlington Value doesn’t have a large team of analysts.
They don’t run advanced machine-learning algorithms or exploit esoteric satellite data and there’s not a single distinguished diploma on their walls.
Read 11 tweets
12 May
Reading this 2003 blog post from @bgurley on Internet-based businesses and how many investors threw every dot-com business out with the bathwater.

Gurley offered 4 reasons why some companies worked when everyone thought they wouldn't.

[THREAD]
abovethecrowd.com/2003/04/23/dot…
1) They weren’t bad ideas:

"In fact many were good ideas. Were there too many consumer startups? Yes! But there were also too many software companies, semiconductor companies, telecom equipment companies, and the list goes on and on.
As we later learned, over-funding (i.e., too many startups with too much capital) was the key issue, not the particular investment category. Low-cost, high-scale marketplaces do in fact exhibit increasing returns.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(