But what if we told you that the same burger moonlights as an economic tool?
A thread...
Well, back in 1986, The Economist introduced the “Big Mac Index” to evaluate the value of currencies across countries via McDonald’s ubiquitous Big Mac burger & this concept came to be known as Burgernomics.
So how does it work?
Suppose a Big Mac costs $5 in the US and 20 Yuan in China. The Big Mac exchange rate would then be 5:20 or 1:4.
However, if the actual exchange ratio was 1:5, investors might predict that the Yuan is cheaper/undervalued by 20%.
Hence, the burger based index is premised on the idea that burger prices around the world can help you judge whether a currency is too cheap or too dear.
Why just the Big Mac though?
Well, for starters, McDonald’s has a phenomenally wide reach in the world, and the survey itself includes ~120 countries
Moreover, the Big Mac is mostly produced to the same specifications around the world & hence, the costs of producing the burger should be relatively standard.
However, in India, McDonalds doesn’t sell the Big Mac due to local sensitivities towards beef.
So the Economist takes into account the Maharaja Mac (which has chicken) as India’s entry to the Big Mac Index.
While The Economist itself states that the Big Mac index “should be taken with a grain of salt”, many economists say that it's roughly accurate, since the pricing of a Big Mac takes into account local costs of raw materials, taxes, etc.
And unorthodox, as it may be, it has now become a popular way of comparing currencies against each other & is widely used by traders in the forex market.
What are your thoughts on this?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Some of the most unusual economic indicators you've probably never heard of-
A thread...
1. Men’s underwear Index: Accordingly to this index, a decline in men’s underwear sales indicates a poor overall state of economy, while an upswing in sales predicts an improving economy.
Hence, by tracking the sales of men's underwear, we might be able to detect the relative health of the economy.
Why is the Indian govt. pushing for a 'land bank'?
In her 2021 budget speech, FM Nirmala Sitharaman announced that the govt will set up a land bank. And recently, the Department of Investment and Public Asset Management (DIPAM) has finalized the structure of this bank to get rid of unproductive landholdings of PSUs
So what exactly is a ‘land bank’? Basically, it is an entity to help manage and dispose of vacant land & to put it to better, more productive use. This single entity will handle all the landholdings of the PSUs.
For the first time ever, a credit rating agency in China is forced to pay ~$8 million for bond defaults of a construction firm.
Why?
A thread...
You see, Credit Rating Agencies (CRAs) are independent entities that evaluate a borrower's creditworthiness. They tell you about a borrower’s state of affairs and offer you an objective assessment of their repayment ability.
And if a company is rated by a CRA, the chances of scoring a loan increase rather disproportionately. So, most corporates actively seek out CRAs to get a rating and pay them good money in the process. Of course, it’s not a bribe. It’s just professional fees.
A thread on how P&G cracked the Indian detergent market.
P&G's detergent brand Tide has been a market leader in the US for many decades. However, when P&G launched Tide in India in 2000 it failed abysmally. Tide could capture just 0.7% of the market after 3 years of its launch.
So the executives were compelled to conduct market research on the Indian detergent market. And they were taken aback by the results.
The research showed about 80% of consumers in India washed their clothes by hand. On the other hand, most people in the US use washing machines so it didn't really matter how the detergent affects your skin.
Amazon paid $0 in federal taxes even after making profits of $3billion and $10billion in 2017 and 2018 resp.
How did they do it?
For the uninitiated, companies in the US pay two types of taxes on their profits. First, a federal tax of 21%, which they pay to the Central Govt, and second a state tax that's paid to the local state govt.
Also, the US govt wanted companies to spend more on R&D so that the US can continue their tech dominance. So, they offered incentives and tax breaks. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, 2017 allowed companies to account for new capital/R&D investments as expenses incurred in the same year
For over 70 years after its inception, Coca-Cola was sold at 5 cents ($0.05). This price remained constant even after the beverage gained popularity.
Why?
Well, it all lies in a business decision made by the then President of the company- Asa Candler. Back in Candler's time, Coca-Cola was mostly sold through soda fountains. But in 1899, two lawyers had a bright idea- they wanted to sell Coke in pet/glass bottles.
So they approached Candler to buy the bottling rights. Candler thought the idea would never really take off, and agreed to sell the lawyers the syrup at a fixed price- forever. They, however, could sell bottled Coca-Cola at any price they deemed fit.