I was just reviewing a colleague's student's CV & it hit home: academia does a horrible job prepping students to write CVs for industry positions. Here are a few pieces of advice based on my experience, but I want to hear from my industry friends!! #ScienceTwitter #lifeadvice 🧵
1) Emphasize what is important "to them". Sure, you care about the N publications you wrote, but a company cares about your technical skills. Put your skills/experience before a list of your pubs.
2) That undergrad job welding that you think isn't important (or whatever similar position)? Maybe it is. Include it. Don't make decisions for other people. Especially about positions that make you unique.
3) Explain all of your work both qualitatively and quantitatively in short phrases. For example, "designed and fabricated new GaAs laser with 30% improvement in threshold" or "designed and synthesized biodegradable PEGDA hydrogel with controllable therapeutic release profile"
4) List your technical skills in a technical skills section. Don't try to weave your skills into the different job experiences. It gets "wordy" and you'll miss things. Make sure not to leave things out.
To my industry (or national lab!) colleagues, what do you like to see in a CV? I know this varies greatly, and there are many opinions. But our students need advice! @Chemjobber @IEEEorg

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Prof. Andrea Armani

Prof. Andrea Armani Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ProfArmani

28 Sep 19
Things I've learned during my time as an editor. A thread.
1) Editors have 4 options: accept, accept w/ minor rev, accept with major rev, decline. The letters for the first & last options are obvious. The letter for the middle two sound like the MS is rejected.
#AcademicTwitter
2) Basically, no one gets accept on the first submission.

3) Good reviewers are hard to find. Corollary: Be a good reviewer.

4) Authors argue with editor decisions way more often than I realized. Corollary: Being polite and fact-driven is really important. #phdlife
5) Don't plagiarize. Yes, this needs to be said.

6) Don't just cite yourself & two of your friends in your reference list.

7) You don't have to make every change requested by the reviewers, but you do have to explain why.

8) The cover letter is really important.
#publishing
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(