Editors: The Australian iteration of purported Fight Homelessness enterprise the @BigIssue has a board packed with finance industry personnel who have turned their backs on vendors. Oh. They also enjoy a CEOs Sell The Big Issue day.
The revulsion many homeless people feel when another "CEO Sleepout" unfolds is the entirely justified response I imagine might greet the @SBS LARP obscenity, Filthy Rich & Homeless, or this, now deleted, @bigissue promotion.
When the egoistic pile of illusory bullshit Filthy Rich & Homeless (celebrity edition) premiered on SBS, I asked a participant how in fuck they thought it could achieve anything but their own sense of smug. They answered by sending me a @wef report.
The @wef or World Economic Forum—Davos, more colloquially—is yet to "solutionise" the persistent problem of poverty its leaders persistently cause by their upwards redistribution of wealth. This is how billionaires on a Swiss mountaintop "check their privilege,", via @MkBlyth
I'm legit grateful for an era of discussion re microaggressions. It wasn't long ago I was last justifiably told what-for by a Blak person & such open notice of my klutzy whiteness is first unpleasant but an ultimate relief. But FFS wake up to the macroaggression of billionaires.
To be clear, my instruction "wake up to the macroaaggression of billionaires" is not directed at persons classified or self-identified with oppressed identity groups. It is to the class of the falsely conscious privilege-checkers in white majority nations, often known as Woke™
To be clearer and less entertaining still, one can be both falsely conscious about one's class— very effing likely not to be the ruling one—and quite keenly or even personally aware of racism, for example. Class is an economic relation. It is not an identity group.
I note a rise in recent years of a crudely peculiar view which holds: it is now the "turn" of women, transpeople, POC etc to accumulate great power AKA wealth. Notwithstanding this has not fucking happened in any meaningful way, wtf is it to be so uncritical of truest privilege?
of course of course of course the populations of persons now classified medically, criminally and by other institutional means as oppressed and, freely now or in the past, as identities are those who accumulate less wealth. but wealth accumulation is in itself the fucking problem
I believe a chap called Fred has much the same to say. Owned a Manchester textile factory?
Just as sexism has been naturalised in the past or racism has been long considered a biological response and even justified by science and state programs of eugenics, so has the right to accumulate power over workers, which is the first essential step toward wealth accumulation.
The "profit motive" is not natural. Capitalism is not the inevitable product of essential human drives. Ask yourself or ask a neoclassical economist or anyone to explain how capitalism, a mode of production imposed by Western Europe mere centuries ago, is "human nature."
All of which to say is that the CEO Sleep-out is the class equivalent of blackface and if you have issues with that parallel, feel free to expand as I believe that my white privilege was checked before making the declaration.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Freedom for Julian Assange

Freedom for Julian Assange Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @HelenRazer

16 Jun
That I'd rather eat a cold bag of @friendlyjordies' sick than endure his tedious YouTubes notwithstanding, solidarity to the media worker on his team arrested by NSW police in the course of making media.
If you are a media worker or a worker of any kind, consider doing the same.
It's true that @friendlyjordies elected not to join the union for his trade, the @withMEAA. Then again, @withMEAA is pretty fucking slack recruiting and didn't clock @caitoz as a HUGE get when I forced her to come to a meeting.
Either way. This arrest is an issue for our union.
As an optimist with no memory for hypocrisy, I'm always shocked by the refusal of local media to support a Greste but not an Assange or a Whatsit Underpants but not an Assange. Or freedom for a crazed white nationalist politician like Navalny but not a Syndey kid with a camera.
Read 13 tweets
26 Feb 20
Why are you not acting on Assange?
Did you see an inspirational talk on Better Living through embrace of your Inner Cop?
If not, speak up.
First, they took the journalists.
#FreeAssange
And there was no one to speak up.
#FreeAssange
Read 38 tweets
30 Jan 20
@Peter_Fitz @smh Perhaps now you could begin hounding government about the past 35 years of upward wealth distribution.
@Peter_Fitz @smh Do consider most of us have little interest in this tale of "corruption" on account of being broke and knowing already that politicians are corrupt.
It's the lawful corruption of neoliberal era economics that has led to levels of wealth inequality unseen since the Depression.
@Peter_Fitz @smh There's more than one reason eyeballs are turning from conventional news and commentary, Peter. I'd say that the biggest one is the widespread failure to acknowledge that more everyday lives are dumped in the toot event day.
This story is told for the pleasure of a tiny class.
Read 5 tweets
9 Jan 20
Lord and savoury relish. Anyone viewed that peculiar Invasion Day propagandist ad on the telly? They're selling its observance like taxes: a regrettably legal responsibility for the common good.
Here, for your consideration, is the miserable campaign to endure the national day.
As is case with most "content", the piece o' shit is more interesting for the assumptions it contains than its imagined capacity to harm or help "the public".
It's like they're asking me to save fat for the war effort or report suspicious activity or something.
It is Your Duty to have a fucken barbecue.
Read 14 tweets
14 Dec 19
By all means, rubbish socialism. But, it might help if you examine our reeking trash pile first.
It is not only the thing that didn't help middling "thinkers" accumulate Sydney property.
It is not the mild social democracy of the Labour Manifesto. At all.
To be clear, today's critics of so-called socialism are, in fact, standard middlebrow opponents of Roosevelt's New Deal. They're fans of the neoclassical "balance" regime that shat itself in 2008 & should apply in writing to the Mont Pelerin Society for the role of arse licker
I know that it's a bother to learn the difference between a Bolshevik and FA Hayek, let alone the subtleties that separate a Blairite from an actual human person.
But. You know. The Labour Manifesto was not socialist. It was not Thatcherite. It was postwar social democracy.
Read 17 tweets
5 Dec 19
To be fair, Naomi Wolf needs to apologise to me for twenty years straight of shit lib feminism.
Naomi Wolf also needs to apologise to Foucault for ripping off The History of Sexuality with all the skill of a first year on triple Adderall.
And she probably should apologise to her own vagina.
nybooks.com/articles/2012/…
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(