The view from Ireland on the recent manipulative action by the alcohol industry to fight against alcohol awareness by creating the preposterous claim that the WHO wants to ban drinking for women.
We feminists have our blind spots too; and this is one: we can apparently easily be manipulated into promoting the interests of an industrial lobby when its PR men spin them as concern for women's rights.
How believable is it that the UK alcohol industry has developed a sudden feminist awareness & is fighting against paternalism & sexism for women's freedom?
How believable is it that they truly believe the WHO wants to ban drinking for women?
The @WHO's ACTUAL concerns got completely wiped out by this faux lobby-manufactured outrage.
They include alcohol-induced violence against family members, traffic accidents, diseases &c, as well as yes, fetal harm, which causes lifelong impairments.
@WHO It infuriates me to see how easily we were played.
It infuriates me when industrial lobbies manipulate women by fake displays of concern for our freedoms (let me laugh) so they can keep making money.
Big Booze is not our feminist ally, and we should not be its puppets.
@WHO Note:
This is very easy in the UK, with its well-oiled tabloid machinery designed to shape agendas by vituperating against international bodies. They do this in their sleep and the public is trained to be receptive.
(hello #Brexit)
Here are some of their lies about the EU.
Oh look, a tobacco and alcohol industry lobbyist suddenly acquires feminist awareness 🤡
Oh look, the male lobbyists for the nicotine and alcohol industry are falling all over each other to demonstrate their new-found feminist credentials. 💰💰💰
Women must be free from the ridiculous and sexist WHO trying to get them to stop drinking and smoking!
Tobacco industry tactics to use women's emancipation against them have been used for almost 100 years:
"The tobacco industry capitalised on changing social attitudes towards women by promoting smoking as a symbol of emancipation, a “torch of freedom”."
OK just a few more words on this even though it's a monumental waste of time, but it just goes to show that none of us are immune to viral fake news created specifically to whip up outrage.
Here you can see how the Daily Mail creates its own storm:
1. Totally false outrage-inducing headline generates thousands of comments 2. Followed by shocked comments from experts, AND ALCOHOL INDUSTRY LOBBYISTS (in article)
Seriously.
Did not know there was so much anti-woman nastiness in embroidery circles...
I hope the @royalacademy takes swift action to reverse its decision to discriminate against an artist and deprive her of her livelihood on the basis of her gender-critical beliefs.
Good action here.
Maybe the @royalacademy will go and have a little think before they get sued for discrimination.
One of Maya Forstater's lawyers, @peter_daly, on @amnesty , the @fawcettsociety, the organised Trade Union movement, the political parties: "All have ignored these women, or been positively hostile"
"Amnesty Ireland went furthest of all by putting its name to a statement calling for people with Gender Critical beliefs to be “denied legitimate political representation”. Even typing that sentence feels implausible."
Maya Forstater's lawyer says in the light of today's judgment, @theSNP need to review their proposed hate crime legislation, and national police forces need to stand down from thought policing.
What an appalling organization.
What an appalling CEO.
The best course of action would have been to recognize the court's judgment, acknowledge failings, and settle compensation for discrimination and wrongful dismissal.
Previous thread on the wondrous and surprising fact that artificial intelligence cannot detect esoteric beliefs which contradict physical reality on the faces of people who hold them:
Lavery pops up in ghoulish delight at his fantasy that a male could have a uterus implanted from a dead or living woman, only to abort the fetus that was presumably was the point of the operation.
A vanity womb, with a vanity abortion, top points in the Great Validation Game <3
Lavery clearly derives pleasure from offending women, as many such misogynists do. Here Lavery takes an event that is often traumatizing for women and sets it as a goal for trans validation.
So yes, it's a fetish for these people, like menstruation, pregnancy, breastfeeding.
Notice the slur & the deliberate "misgendering".
Lavery knows it's women objecting to his fetishistic fantasy of trophy abortions when he says "Real feminist activists, these GUYS".
Weird to claim to be a woman when you hate them so much, isn't it?