Billionaires, big banks, and hedge funds are flooded with cash but don't want to invest in productive businesses or pay taxes, so they're lobbying to have the government pay them to steal public lands so they can impose taxes on everyone else.

I'm not exaggerating.

🧵
/1
Here's $3.75 trillion in cash sitting in commercial banks. It could be lent out to people or businesses; they do not want to do that. They're "waiting for opportunities to invest at higher rates." There's a concern "human beings are getting paid more." "Overheating," they say.
/2
The Senate group has released merely two pages, but embedded in there appears to be a proposal for the wealthiest 0.01% to get a discount (via tax credits) to get paid (via debt interest) to get paid again (via dividends) to own public infrastructure and overcharge us for it.
/3
We could mitigate some of this with a wealth tax on the obscenely rich, giving them an incentive to seek returns by investing in people & businesses, rather than hoarding trillions in cash while lobbying the Fed and the gov't to pay them to give them permanent monopolies.

/end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Max Kennerly

Max Kennerly Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MaxKennerly

6 Jun
Remember all the contrarians complaining about the FDA taking too much time with clinical trials? Well, here's what happens when you skip Phase 2 and cut Phase 3 short. This has risks and would cost $50,000 annually, but we can't tell if it sort-of works or doesn't work at all.
It's disconcerting. Typically, a drug is approved on surrogate markers because the condition's rarity or the drug's narrow indication make it difficult to do robust clinical trials.

Here that's no issue. The lack of data is due to the company and the FDA.
The resignations probably need to go farther down the chain as well. The FDA's decision to approve aducanumab was plainly irresponsible.
Read 4 tweets
13 Apr
Good evening folks, some of the biggest names on Wall Street are releasing their earnings this week, and so it's time for your favorite show,

📈TRADE
👍LIKE
🗣️A
💰REPUBLICAN
🤡SENATOR

With tonight's guests, @SenCapito & @LeaderMcConnell! Let's see what they're investing in.

/1
.@LeaderMcConnell mostly puts his millions into Vanguard mutual funds—including making money off of underfunded infrastructure that forces municipalities to issue debt—but he's got a special place in his heart for Wells Fargo, which does lots of lobbying. /2
.@LeaderMcConnell and his wife just can't get enough Wells Fargo $WFC stock. Bought some more in March. Wells Fargo announces their earnings Wednesday morning, get your orders in now!
/3
Read 6 tweets
23 Mar
Of course they have. It's America, you can't go to a supermarket without mentally prepping in case someone murders a half-dozen people.

Colorado is a shall-issue concealed carry state. "Good guy with a gun" is no answer. The cop was a "good guy with a gun," now they're dead too.
"But it's in the Bill of Rights!"

Hardly. As of 1789, several states had personal rights to firearms. The Framers ignored those and instead wrote a limited right for state militias. Right-wing Justices made up the personal "right" 200 years later.
Here's a thread of mine from a few months ago about the disingenuous "history" used to justify current Second Amendment law.
Read 4 tweets
15 Mar
The new thing on the right is calling the COVID vaccines "gene therapy." That's like saying horses are solar-powered because they eat plants. It's wordplay, the type of statement that is only "true" in a silly, useless, bad faith way.

Let's discuss.
/1
A viral vaccination works by putting something like the virus in your body so your immune system can learn to fight the virus. You can use a weakened or dead version of the virus, a specific part of the virus, or code for part of the virus.
/2

The vaccines carry code for the COVID spike protein. J&J carries it in DNA stuffed into a virus that can't replicate (Ad26), Moderna & Pfizer carry it in mRNA. Your cells read it and start making the spike protein.

None of them change your own genes.
/3 nytimes.com/interactive/20…
Read 7 tweets
2 Mar
Manchin's hero, Robert Byrd, believed presiding officer + 51 votes = cloture.

But if Manchin disagrees, he leaves @SenSchumer & @VP with no choice: end the "two-track" system and enforce Senate rules for debate.

There's a reason filibusters before 1972 usually failed.

/1
Talk back to the presiding officer? Fail (1837)

Poisoned eggnog? Somebody stepped out? Fail (1908)

Impugn another Senator? Fail (1948)

Need to pee? Trolled by a Senator with a drink? Fail (1957)

That's the real tradition of the filibuster.

getrevue.co/profile/maxken…

/2
.@Sen_JoeManchin talks about Robert Byrd as if he was a Republican obstructionist. The reason cloture is 3/5 now instead of 2/3 is because Dems, including Byrd, used the nuclear option in 1975.

Byrd's own view was chair + 51 votes = cloture.
getrevue.co/profile/maxken…
/3
Read 5 tweets
26 Feb
Reminder about all the supposed "norms" of the Senate: in 2001, when the Senate Parliamentarian "made it harder for the GOP to push President Bush's budget and tax cut proposals through the evenly divided body," Republicans simply fired him: washingtonpost.com/archive/politi…
I don't blame the Senate Parliamentarian, the "rules" of reconciliation are a joke.

In terms of "what now?" both options—VP Harris ruling otherwise or a standalone minimum wage bill—boil down entirely to whether 50 Dems would do it, i.e. Manchin & Sinema.
It's not really up to Harris. Sure, she can disregard the Parliamentarian—but she'll immediately face an appeal of her ruling. If she doesn't have 50 votes to back it up, it's an embarrassing defeat for no reason. The problems here are Manchin & Sinema.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(