Billionaires, big banks, and hedge funds are flooded with cash but don't want to invest in productive businesses or pay taxes, so they're lobbying to have the government pay them to steal public lands so they can impose taxes on everyone else.
Here's $3.75 trillion in cash sitting in commercial banks. It could be lent out to people or businesses; they do not want to do that. They're "waiting for opportunities to invest at higher rates." There's a concern "human beings are getting paid more." "Overheating," they say.
/2
The Senate group has released merely two pages, but embedded in there appears to be a proposal for the wealthiest 0.01% to get a discount (via tax credits) to get paid (via debt interest) to get paid again (via dividends) to own public infrastructure and overcharge us for it.
/3
We could mitigate some of this with a wealth tax on the obscenely rich, giving them an incentive to seek returns by investing in people & businesses, rather than hoarding trillions in cash while lobbying the Fed and the gov't to pay them to give them permanent monopolies.
/end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Remember all the contrarians complaining about the FDA taking too much time with clinical trials? Well, here's what happens when you skip Phase 2 and cut Phase 3 short. This has risks and would cost $50,000 annually, but we can't tell if it sort-of works or doesn't work at all.
It's disconcerting. Typically, a drug is approved on surrogate markers because the condition's rarity or the drug's narrow indication make it difficult to do robust clinical trials.
Here that's no issue. The lack of data is due to the company and the FDA.
.@LeaderMcConnell mostly puts his millions into Vanguard mutual funds—including making money off of underfunded infrastructure that forces municipalities to issue debt—but he's got a special place in his heart for Wells Fargo, which does lots of lobbying. /2
.@LeaderMcConnell and his wife just can't get enough Wells Fargo $WFC stock. Bought some more in March. Wells Fargo announces their earnings Wednesday morning, get your orders in now!
/3
Hardly. As of 1789, several states had personal rights to firearms. The Framers ignored those and instead wrote a limited right for state militias. Right-wing Justices made up the personal "right" 200 years later.
The new thing on the right is calling the COVID vaccines "gene therapy." That's like saying horses are solar-powered because they eat plants. It's wordplay, the type of statement that is only "true" in a silly, useless, bad faith way.
Let's discuss.
/1
A viral vaccination works by putting something like the virus in your body so your immune system can learn to fight the virus. You can use a weakened or dead version of the virus, a specific part of the virus, or code for part of the virus.
/2
The vaccines carry code for the COVID spike protein. J&J carries it in DNA stuffed into a virus that can't replicate (Ad26), Moderna & Pfizer carry it in mRNA. Your cells read it and start making the spike protein.
.@Sen_JoeManchin talks about Robert Byrd as if he was a Republican obstructionist. The reason cloture is 3/5 now instead of 2/3 is because Dems, including Byrd, used the nuclear option in 1975.
Reminder about all the supposed "norms" of the Senate: in 2001, when the Senate Parliamentarian "made it harder for the GOP to push President Bush's budget and tax cut proposals through the evenly divided body," Republicans simply fired him: washingtonpost.com/archive/politi…
I don't blame the Senate Parliamentarian, the "rules" of reconciliation are a joke.
In terms of "what now?" both options—VP Harris ruling otherwise or a standalone minimum wage bill—boil down entirely to whether 50 Dems would do it, i.e. Manchin & Sinema.
It's not really up to Harris. Sure, she can disregard the Parliamentarian—but she'll immediately face an appeal of her ruling. If she doesn't have 50 votes to back it up, it's an embarrassing defeat for no reason. The problems here are Manchin & Sinema.