Genocide & actual environmental justice is at stake
If you're capable of watching this video, then you're capable of understanding the inherently physical reason that renewables have massively negative environmental impacts
Energy-dense fuels require far less in the way of materials, and produces far less in the way of waste, compared to energy-dilute solar and wind
We think of solar panels as clean but there is no plan to deal with their toxic waste
The climate scolds who demand we "listen to the science!" have been actively ignoring and denying the science of power density, which anyone with Google Maps and middle-school arithmetic can do in 5 minutes by drawing a line around power plants
I have encouraged mainstream environmental journalists to compare land use and power density of energy sources for a decade. For a combination of ideological and personal reasons, many are former English or journalism majors who are intimidated even by arithmetic, few have.
I wrote Apocalypse Never as an "Environmental Studies 101" for students, journalists, and policymakers
Bernadette, Suparti & Helen from Congo, Indonesia, & Berkeley tell the story of rising energy consumption, rising prosperity, & rising power density
A major new investigation by @NPR of Calfornia's Gov. @GavinNewsom is damning:
"An investigation from @CapRadioNews and NPR’s California Newsroom found the governor has misrepresented his accomplishments and even disinvested in wildfire prevention."
"California’s response faltered under Newsom. After an initial jump during his first year in office, data obtained by CapRadio and NPR’s California Newsroom show Cal Fire’s fuel reduction output dropped by half in 2020, to levels below Gov. Jerry Brown’s final year in office."
Nations spent trillions subsidizing solar & wind but the share of energy from fossil fuels is nearly unchanged, going from 80.3% to 80.2% over last 10 years
The reason is because unreliable, weather-dependent energies can’t replace reliable energies
In 2017 my colleagues @energybants@Ramamurthy_Arun discovered that there was no correlation between solar or wind and the “carbon intensity” of energy — CO2 emissions per unit of energy — at an aggregated level
By contrast, the deployment of nuclear & hydro was strongly correlated with declining carbon intensity of energy. Why? Because both are reliable, and can thus replace coal and nat gas plants, where solar panels & wind turbines cannot. They can only operate alongside fossil fuels.
Bombshell new study published in @HarvardBiz Review finds that solar panel waste will make the electricity produced by solar panels *four times* more expensive than experts had predicted
Here's why everything they said about solar was wrong
In 2018 I argued that solar panels weren’t clean & produce 300x more toxic waste than high-level nuclear waste. In contrast to nuclear waste, which is safely stored and never hurts anyone, solar waste threatens poor trash-pickers in sub-Saharan Africa.
An influential analyst, @solar_chase called my article, “a fine example of 'prove [renewable energy] is terrible by linking lots of reports which don't actually support your point..."
To clarify, nuclear plants *directly* employ ~1,200 workers/plant
They tend to be the best-paid energy workers
Solar farms temporarily employ low-wage, low-to-zero skill workers to install China-made panels, and 6-12, also low-wage maintenance workers, permanently
I was in the passenger seat of a crowded car, a politician who I knew was at the wheel (Pelosi? Breed?). She was happy and chatty, but there were bodies everywhere, some floating in water, and the road became increasingly narrow, curving, and dangerous.
“Stop the car!” I yelled
There was a man lying near the car with his dog
“Somebody help me!” I yelled, and jumped out of the car, but nobody did
I shook the man and yelled at him. “Are you okay?! Are you okay?!” I poked him once and again, harder. I checked his pulse. Nothing