Stop using climate to distract from your failure

- You *reduced* Calif. forests treated for fire by 50% (!) btwn 2019 - 2020

- You exaggerated by 690% the acres treated with fuel breaks & prescribed burns

- Bad forest mgmt not temps is *primary* cause of high-intensity fires
A major new investigation by @NPR of Calfornia's Gov. @GavinNewsom is damning:

"An investigation from @CapRadioNews and NPR’s California Newsroom found the governor has misrepresented his accomplishments and even disinvested in wildfire prevention."

capradio.org/articles/2021/…
"California’s response faltered under Newsom. After an initial jump during his first year in office, data obtained by CapRadio and NPR’s California Newsroom show Cal Fire’s fuel reduction output dropped by half in 2020, to levels below Gov. Jerry Brown’s final year in office."
Wait, it gets worse

"At the same time, Newsom slashed roughly $150 million from Cal Fire’s wildfire prevention budget. This year, data show that through Memorial Day, the annual number of acres worked remained low, despite fire season that threatens to be even more dangerous."
"The data show @GavinNewsom has done just 13% of the job he’s touted on his highest priority projects. The governor’s office did not respond to multiple requests for comment over the course of two weeks, including a 500 word email that laid out the investigation’s findings."
Wait wait, it's worse than that

With the happy participation of "environmental journalists" around the world, the global news media last year, under the sway of Gavin and activist scientists, falsely blamed climate change for the state's historic, high-intensity fires.
In fact, much of the news media, including progressive media, had in years prior to last year *correctly* reported that the overwhelmingly main factor behind high-intensity fires was the over-accumulation of wood fuel

motherjones.com/environment/20…
But in 2020, @GavinNewsom appealed to the partisan tribalism of "environmental journalists" and they overwhelmingly mis-described the high-intensity fires as climate-driven when in reality they were caused by poor forest management
The new report by @CapRadioNews shows that @GavinNewsom had an ulterior motive in misleading the public about California's high intensity fires: he was distracting attention from his own failure to expand fire treatments in forests.
"The head of Cal Fire, Chief Thom Porter, did grant an interview. He acknowledged the figures cited by Newsom were incorrect and took responsibility for the governor’s misstatements."
"Porter, who stood behind Newsom at a series of press conferences where the governor boasted of his accomplishments, said Cal Fire had neither 'done our job in educating the public, nor the governor’s office' about how to talk about its wildfire prevention efforts."
Got that? Gavin made Porter fall on his sword for Gavin. Classic.

"Porter confirmed the agency had fallen short of its fuel reduction goals. “It’s not something that I’m comfortable with,” he said. “It is something that I’m working to reconcile and to correct for the future.”
But is this because California doesn't have enough money? No.

"The 2019 budget allocated $355 million for wildfire prevention and resource management. The following year, after the COVID-19 pandemic hit, Newsom slashed that to $203 million — a decrease of more than 40%."
What California spends on forest fire prevention is trivial

For perspective, Gavin is proposing to spend $12 *billion* on homelessness

That's *59 times* more money than Gavin's 2020 wildfire prevention budget!

michaelshellenberger.substack.com/p/why-californ…
Gavin's failure to take aggressive action on forest fires is inexcusable and unconscionable

California has a $76 *billion* surplus this year

California forest fires kill people and cost the state billions

This is a consequence of ideology-driven incompetence
This scandal is also another real-world example of the consequences of apocalyptic climate ideology married to partisan tribalism

Gavin spent 2019 and 2020 using forest fires to attacking Donald Trump and other Republicans as "climate deniers"

We now know that the entire time he was doing that he was *reducing* both the budget for fire treatment and the forest area treated

"As Newsom boasted about the 35 projects, fire prevention funding and productivity dwindled."

SMH

capradio.org/articles/2021/…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael Shellenberger

Michael Shellenberger Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ShellenbergerMD

22 Jun
Nations spent trillions subsidizing solar & wind but the share of energy from fossil fuels is nearly unchanged, going from 80.3% to 80.2% over last 10 years

The reason is because unreliable, weather-dependent energies can’t replace reliable energies

ren21.net/wp-content/upl…
In a way this is an old finding

In 2017 my colleagues @energybants @Ramamurthy_Arun discovered that there was no correlation between solar or wind and the “carbon intensity” of energy — CO2 emissions per unit of energy — at an aggregated level

environmentalprogress.org/big-news/2017/…
By contrast, the deployment of nuclear & hydro was strongly correlated with declining carbon intensity of energy. Why? Because both are reliable, and can thus replace coal and nat gas plants, where solar panels & wind turbines cannot. They can only operate alongside fossil fuels.
Read 11 tweets
21 Jun
For decades people pointed out how toxic solar production & waste were but

- biased news media refused to investigate

- solar industry spread misinformation through @NRDC @SierraClub @Greenpeace

- @BlackRock @IRENA et al manipulated analyses

PROOF

michaelshellenberger.substack.com/p/why-bidens-c…
But there are no more excuses

Genocide & actual environmental justice is at stake

If you're capable of watching this video, then you're capable of understanding the inherently physical reason that renewables have massively negative environmental impacts

Energy-dense fuels require far less in the way of materials, and produces far less in the way of waste, compared to energy-dilute solar and wind

We think of solar panels as clean but there is no plan to deal with their toxic waste

quillette.com/2019/02/27/why…
Read 6 tweets
21 Jun
Bombshell new study published in @HarvardBiz Review finds that solar panel waste will make the electricity produced by solar panels *four times* more expensive than experts had predicted

Here's why everything they said about solar was wrong

michaelshellenberger.substack.com/p/why-everythi…
In 2018 I argued that solar panels weren’t clean & produce 300x more toxic waste than high-level nuclear waste. In contrast to nuclear waste, which is safely stored and never hurts anyone, solar waste threatens poor trash-pickers in sub-Saharan Africa.

forbes.com/sites/michaels…
An influential analyst, @solar_chase called my article, “a fine example of 'prove [renewable energy] is terrible by linking lots of reports which don't actually support your point..."

Read 35 tweets
19 Jun
Solar jobs are in China not US

Largest solar farm in US will create *6* permanent jobs

Solar panels are imported from Xinjiang, China where “forced labor” is used under “genocide” conditions

Democrats are trying to close nuclear plants that employ ~1,200 workers at high pay
To clarify, nuclear plants *directly* employ ~1,200 workers/plant

They tend to be the best-paid energy workers

Solar farms temporarily employ low-wage, low-to-zero skill workers to install China-made panels, and 6-12, also low-wage maintenance workers, permanently
Read 10 tweets
19 Jun
These were the last images I saw before falling asleep

They may explain the dream I just had. It was so terrifying I woke myself up.

My heart is still racing as write this
I was in the passenger seat of a crowded car, a politician who I knew was at the wheel (Pelosi? Breed?). She was happy and chatty, but there were bodies everywhere, some floating in water, and the road became increasingly narrow, curving, and dangerous.

“Stop the car!” I yelled
There was a man lying near the car with his dog

“Somebody help me!” I yelled, and jumped out of the car, but nobody did

I shook the man and yelled at him. “Are you okay?! Are you okay?!” I poked him once and again, harder. I checked his pulse. Nothing
Read 28 tweets
18 Jun
Thank goodness San Francisco isn’t getting in the way of anybody’s happiness
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(