The siren song of selling RCP8.5 to gullible customers in the finance industry attracts a few more climate scientists …
Climate Scientists Dr. James Kossin and Dr. Timothy Hall Join The Climate Service, a Leading Provider of Climate Risk Analytics finance.yahoo.com/news/climate-s…
I wouldn’t deny anyone the right to sell their services to the highest bidder, go for it
But this raises a COI eyebrow …
“A strategic advisor with The Climate Service since the company's early day…”
I don’t believe any of his papers disclosed the relationship & now it’s a job
In medicine or energy or any field having an undisclosed relationship with a company that yields financial benefits is expected to be disclosed
Even in climate
Lots of this goes on
And it shouldn’t
Funny thing (to me at least)
I was investigated by the US Congress based on allegation of secret relationships w/ corporations
There weren’t/aren’t any
But there are plenty in this field out in plain sight
Research ethics shouldn’t be a function of how popular your research is
The increasingly common revolving door among those involved in RCP8.5 studies, consulting, and policy is gonna need a lot more attention
RCP8.5 is not simply an outdated scenario that warps climate science in perverse ways
It is also a growing industry 💰💰
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
For those folks complaining that a single trans athlete at Tokyo is squeezing out the participation of a non-trans athlete ... let me know when you start complaining that at Tokyo there are (according to IOC) 267 more male athletes than female athletes, squeezing out ~133 females
Reminder instant mute policy is on, so don't be a jerk
And in the Paralympic Games Tokyo 2020, there will be 836 more men than women participants, squeezing out ~418 women
So you care deeply about fairness in elite sport participation? Great
Here are ~550 P/Olympic spots taken by men that (in fairness) should go to women
This is another example where science institutions may have info not publicly available that might be worth sharing -- in this case the requests/justifications from depositors of the sequences for their deletion
🧵Important new paper
Hinkel, J., et al. "Uncertainty and bias in global to regional scale assessments of current and future coastal flood risk." Earth's Future: e2020EF001882. agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.102…
Many projections of the future effects of climate change ignore adaptation
For flood damage that leads to a variation factor of 1,300x!!
Compare ice sheet uncertainty that varies by as much as 3.8x
SLR uncertainties are dwarfed by adaptive capacity
Our policy differences result from different views of “competitive sport”
Ross see it to “reward performance excellence” based on “physiology”
Well, yes
This is true like the stock market exists to “reward business excellence” based on “economics”
But there’s a lot more going on
Competitive sport actually has a history
And we can look at history to see justifications provided when it was created
And it turns out, it’s a pretty complicated & sordid history, reflective of the broader society of which sport is a part
That’s right - Sport is part of society