With all the speculation about the Fed raising interest rates sooner than later, let's take a look at how past "liftoff" attempts by the Fed affected the markets, and how the Fed then responded. (THREAD)
There have been four major liftoff attempts since the Global Financial Crisis. The first was in April 2010, after an 80% run in the S&P 500. The Fed ended QE1, producing a three month, 16% drawdown for stocks, which forced the Fed to start QE2 a few months later. /2
The second attempted liftoff gave us the infamous taper tantrum in May 2013 (8% drawdown). The third was the actual liftoff in 2018, which ultimately produced a brief but scary 20% decline for stocks. And now we are in the early stages of the fourth liftoff attempt. /3
For each of these four episodes I show the forward curve at the beginning and at the end, to show who won the round (the market or the Fed). /4
In March 2009, after a 57% fall in the SPX, the forward curve signaled a 1.46% funds rate over two years. In April 2010, that forward curve had jumped to 2.17%. After the correction, the forward curve was down to 99 basis points (i.e., four fewer rate hikes priced in). /5
In May 2013, before the taper tantrum, the forward curve priced in just two rate hikes over the subsequent two years. Then Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke uttered those famous words and the curve added in four more hikes. /6
Despite the sharp rise in real rates in 2013, the curve did not un-price those hikes, although the market did force the Fed to continue QE3 for several more years. /7
Then in 2018 the Fed was finally able to bring rates back to neutral while also shrinking its balance sheet. But then it went too far (for the market’s liking, at least), and in Q4 of 2018 stocks went into a tailspin. /8
In August of that year (when the 10-year was above 3%) the forward curve priced in a terminal rate of 2.64%. By the end of the year after a 20% drawdown, the curve was pricing in rate cuts. /9
Now we are in the fourth liftoff episode. At the end of 2020 the forward curve priced in no rate hikes as far as the eye could see (2026). A few weeks ago the curve priced in a terminal rate of 0.87%; then, after last week’s FOMC meeting, that rate is now up to 1.17%. /10
I think the Fed is signaling an eventual liftoff to something resembling a more neutral policy. I think the market should have seen this coming a mile away, but clearly everyone was in the same reflation boat. /11
It’s my take that the Fed will normalize policy if and when the economy can handle it, no sooner. The current reset in the reflation trade(s) may eventually prove to be a buying opportunity. But the liftoff dance is just getting started, so patience is warranted for now. /END

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jurrien Timmer

Jurrien Timmer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TimmerFidelity

22 Jun
My “failed 5th” call last week was premature, but today’s undercut & subsequent reversal still fits with my 5th-wave thesis outlined earlier. Now too we have some interesting divergences, which only increases my conviction that bitcoin is bottoming. (THREAD)
Here is the 14-day slow stochastic: bearish divergence at the high and bullish divergence now. /2
The GS Bitcoin-sensitive equities basket remains in an up-trend (higher highs, higher lows), and in the process also appears to be flashing a bullish divergence against btc’s new low. /3
Read 4 tweets
21 Jun
With all the talk about bitcoin’s death cross (50d MA < 200d MA), here is the back-test: Since 2011 there have been 7 occurrences, and 71% of the time btc was higher 12 months later. There were some huge drawdowns but often times the signal came too late to be of use. (THREAD) Image
Many technical indicators can be a coin toss without proper context. The same applies to stocks: since 1928 the SPX has had 48 death crosses, but 3 months later it was up 58% of the time by an average of 5.2%. Context is everything. /2 Image
Death crosses can keep us out of the worst bear markets, but they can also give many false warnings (i.e. smaller corrections that are mostly over by the time the signal hits). /3
Read 4 tweets
8 Jun
Bitcoin’s 5th wave seems to be underway, in what has been a textbook pattern so far (). A classic 5th (where 5=1) would target 23,076. But sometimes 5th waves can fall short & reach only 0.618x1 (29,872). THREAD/1
Sometimes there can even be a “failed 5th” (retest of the wave 3 low at 30,017). Yes EWT is as much art as science. With all the attention out there on the triangle breakdown, it wouldn’t surprise me if we end up with a shorter 5th. /2
If so, it’ll be important that the retest gets rejected with a powerful reversal. That could trigger a bullish momentum divergence (the opposite of what we saw at the high). But if BTC makes a new low and stays there, that would be a bearish sign. /3
Read 5 tweets
1 Jun
As a “lifelong” technician, I am finding that bitcoin lends itself well to technical analysis. Here is my take on the recent price action. (THREAD)
Elliott Wave Theory: Looking at the chart pattern since the recent high of 64,870, I can't help but notice that a textbook 5-wave decline may be unfolding. According to EWT, primary trends move in 5 waves and corrections are 3 waves. /2
The typical progression is that wave 1 is generally dismissed as noise, then wave 2 is a sharp and deep retracement of wave 1 (at least 62% but sometimes 75% or more), which creates the false comfort that it was indeed just a minor correction. /3
Read 15 tweets
26 May
A year into a new bull market cycle, the valuation-driven phase is giving way to a more mature earnings-driven cycle. This chart shows the interplay between the deltas of total return, valuation & earnings. Note the similarities of our current cycle & the GFC. THREAD/1
In March 2009, the S&P 500 finally bottomed after a 57% decline. As is typical for this type of cycle, price bottomed several quarters before earnings. The blue bars below show the year-over-year change in the P/E ratio and the pink bars show the change in EPS. /2
Note how changes in earnings and valuation tend to be almost a mirror image of each other. The dark blue line is the year-over-year total return for the SPX. /3
Read 5 tweets
26 May
While the S&P 500 has hovered around the 4100 level since April, there has been a lot of churn beneath the surface, with the highest fliers rising to truly spectacular levels before crashing back to earth. THREAD/1
To help visualize this, I indexed the various sectors & styles to the Feb 2020 (pre-Covid) high in the S&P 500. This first chart shows the S&P 500 w/ its eleven sectors. The dispersion in sector performance was very wide last fall (mostly due to energy), but it has tightened. /2
Next, the four style boxes (Russell indices). See the recent lopsided performance by large-cap growth, which then passed the baton to value and small caps a few months ago. Whatever dispersion existed last fall has dwindled, while the S&P 500 churns sideways. /3
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(