Once identitarian allies realize they are not going to be 'forgiven' for the thing they have been gaslit into believing they are guilty of, what is the next logical step for in-group minorities and out-group allies?
Watch this short news clip.
They say you must be uncomfortable to be a part of the movement. What happens when the current public shaming sessions where 200 people kneel, fist raised and claim allegiance to BLM/CRT is no longer an uncomfortable act. What must these allies do next to remain in-group?
They say that white-allies may not be willing to tear down the system, but white-accomplices are. You must then move from words to action, destroying whatever segment of society in-grouo members deem evil and thus requiring destruction.
Is that like in Portland where Police Stations were burned? In NYC where business districts were looted? Or small town America where entire blocks were burned down? What happens when these are actions that no longer make allies or accomplices uncomfortable? What then?
Attacking random people on the street because in-group members demand solidarity through action from their white-allies or accomplices? Do more people, people who may have been passive, then join to avoid becoming targeted? At some point self preservation enters the narrative.
Then you get a duality in response. Those who join to avoid targeting, and those who don't because to do so would be to join with those perpetrating evil action. Many say, I would stand against it! But in truth, many would go along as people have in the past when evil arises.
Stopping the creep of CRT/BLM now will keep you from having to make the difficult decision years from now, or worse prevent your children from having to make the decision in their time. Evil is easier stopped at the outset than once it wields power.
No one wants to see their kids forced to be this guy, because probability says they'll be like everyone else around him just to survive. 
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
