New Online Safety Bill will be a disaster for freedom of speech
It is based on the concept of "Duty of Care": proactive censorship of entirely legal content on the basis of potential psychological harms.
The Duty of Care Framework comes from a consortium of "be kind" NGOs
Also these ones.....
As @IndexCensorship warn "The proponents of the draft Online Safety Bill have created a new construct, the Duty of Care, that bypasses both Parliament and the Courts, in order to create a new framework for private censorship."
"That this has happened with so little debate, or scrutiny, is of deep concern and could have major
implications both within the UK and across the globe..."
(where have we seen that before?)
"The framework is one where the state must sanction the social network if it does not proactively reduce the space for ideas, concepts or content that could cause harm to
individuals psychological well-being."
In principle this is a bad idea.
And individuals who have been banned, reported, investigated and sanctioned for saying perfectly ordinary things about sex know it is a bad idea
This might be pushed through by sleeping politicians and an electorate that thinks "it will affect really, really nasty online".
But it is clear that these orgs have branded nearly everyone Transphobes and put fear into them at work are not to be trusted with our freedom.
Intro: Given todays topic some people will find the language distressing
Robin is the go to lawyer at Old Square Chambers on transgender matters and has taken over the Bloomberg chapter on employment law on trans matters
Robin: MF worked as a consultant for CGD. Ms Forstater has firm views about trans matters - that transwomen are men, that sex is immutable and that TW should not be allowed access to certain women's spaces
The funders promoting the fashionable idea that "male" and "female" no longer matter are now playing the word game on the difference between rich and poor countries.
You are paid millions. You are respected. You have OBEs.
Your orgs are systematically beating down on women w little power.
Freelancers, artists, early career, returners to work, single mothers, women in refuges. Those who cannot afford to speak up or most easily disposable.
Yes the bullies are in your organisations.
They are running your D&I function. They are in your affinity groups. You are paying them to lobby you.
Dear @ayeshahazarika
I have not attacked you.
I do not engage in mindless cruelty
I do not get off on misgendering trans women, calling them men in dresses or making pathetic, vile comments
Here are some of the things I have written about sex and gender
Here is the article which contributed to me losing my job
I have been in complaints and counter-complaints process with them since Gregor Murray in June 2019 accused me of "abuse" for two tweets, calling me an "anti-trans bigot" and Transgender Trend a "hate group" which they took up
In the Scout Association's latest response (before the judgment) they said that the fact that I defended myself by saying that I would, where appropriate call a man a man, meant that I might not be suitable as a scout leader.
This is my defence of myself to the Scout Association that the employment tribunal (now overturned) said made me "absolutist" and "not worthy of respect".
The same defence was judged by Scouts to make me suspect as a Leader