The funders promoting the fashionable idea that "male" and "female" no longer matter are now playing the word game on the difference between rich and poor countries.
https://twitter.com/BrankoMilan/status/1405706679681945601
hewlett.org/introducing-ou…
Hewlett rebadge its "global development & population" programme as "gender & governance".
Why not "women"? because we want to "enable people of all gender identities to lead lives of dignity and fulfillment"
Hewlett rebadge its "global development & population" programme as "gender & governance".
Why not "women"? because we want to "enable people of all gender identities to lead lives of dignity and fulfillment"
Sure - and all religions, political, ethnic and other identities...
But why would any of these identities be interchangeable with something that is intended to address the particular challenges faced by women?
But why would any of these identities be interchangeable with something that is intended to address the particular challenges faced by women?
This is another version of the "manels" question.
Why would you take a programme that is about the female 50% of the population and get confused that it is something to do with "gender identity"
Why would you take a programme that is about the female 50% of the population and get confused that it is something to do with "gender identity"
https://twitter.com/MForstater/status/1044495561481703424
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
