To add to today's debate about a quarantine requirement in the EU for travelers from the UK - one criticism is: why no exception for the fully vaccinated? /1
Worthwhile to point out: the UK has almost all EU Member States on the amber list. Consequence? Quarantine - without exception for the fully vaccinated /2
(Here's the website) gov.uk/guidance/red-a… So maybe we can stop the "oh the EU is angry because of Brexit" stuff and get straight to: WHY is it that neither side recognizes the vaccination of the other side? /3
We can eliminate one thing straight off the bat: it has nothing to do with AZ v. Pfizer. Both EU and UK recognize both vaccinations. /4
But there are two reasons why you might have a problem with recognizing vaccinations. /5
The first: being careful. Particularly with variants we know that vaccination protects you from getting seriously ill. But also from infecting others? /6
That is quite clearly the rule in Germany: Vaccination will release you from quarantine obligations EXCEPT if you come from a territory listed as a virus variant territory. bundesgesundheitsministerium.de/service/gesetz… /7
The second problem is: getting a system of mutual recognition in place. And here it actually seems to be all over at the moment (France seems to recognize UK vaccinations I have been told). /8
That is an administrative issue - and not necessarily a simple one. How to prove vaccination? How to make sure that everyone knows which proves are valid?
Some work to be done... /9
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A thread on trade agreements - namely the CPTPP - and why the devil is in the detail (thread)
1) You will have heard a lot of rather general statements on the CPTPP. "These are roughly the economic gains - altogether I favor membership, but more because of its strategic value than immediate economic benefits" (yes, I'm guilty of that, too. /2
2) Behind these headlines, there's a whole number of really complex questions that make a significant difference in reality - and that also illustrate why more eyes on an FTA is better, to spot any issues. /3
When FTAs go mainstream, the problem is that every publication needs to write about them. But most don’t have people on staff who understand them. /1
I would guess that a majority of those who have heard about the UK-Oz FTA think that the agreement is in force now. It isn’t. /2
But trade experts really don’t help (nostra culpa, nostra culpa, nostra maxima culpa) by inventing concepts such as ‘agreement in principle’. Where the parties are sure that they’ll reach an FTA shortly, but haven’t yet. /3
I was, quite justifiably, asked "what does get over Brexit mean" given the trade effect of Brexit. That deserves an answer (thread)
I have not been shy pointing out that from a trade perspective Brexit is not a winning proposition - but that the EU is about more and if you do not want to be part of it that is a legitimate choice.
I have repeatedly pointed out falsehoods. But I try to inform debate about actual choices from where we are.
This country has got to get over Brexit. The debate is increasingly skewed - and allow me to argue this tweet is actually counterproductive in that regard (and I say that as someone on balance in favor of a UK-Oz FTA) (thread)
FTAs have always had people who favour them and people against them. That's true of the WTO, too. Think of the "battle of Seattle" (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1999_Seat…)
Some of that is opposition to globalization, some of that opposition to free trade. Some of it has good reasons, some of it reasons I reject. But it is a debate that is very much present everywhere. And it's not about Brexit. But there's more.