I’ve saved and reorganized my finances to purchase a new house. I just need my mortgage approved. My rental/home office is too small & doesn’t suit my needs.

Then my rental burns down. But I haven’t yet received my mortgage approval.

What do I do?

Go ahead and buy the house?
Or look after my immediate need for income, shelter, food & clothing for myself & my family?

NDP says buy the house.

Those with practical skills, logic and rational reasoning look after immediate needs and put house purchase off for another day.

I will buy a new house.
But I’m not going to leave my children and spouse to live in the neighbourhood park until I get secure my income and have my mortgage approved based on that income.

But NDP continues to use faulty logic by lamenting pharmacare, in the middle of a once in a century pandemic.
How people can rationally support NDP, I don’t know.

Millions of people’s incomes disappeared overnight. Ensuring the crisis was managed was the priority. That costs money. Which does not grow on trees. Even if we can print it, we must balance the spending with inflation.
Canada could just print money for everyone in perpetuity. Why bother to work, produce, trade or invest? We could just print as much as is needed.

Because then money loses its value, and you end up like Venezuela where a carton of milk for your kids costs $10K.
Healthcare and medicine become unattainable, because your currency no longer has value.

We can borrow extra money, but we need to use it to ensure the economy is preserved. Because if people don’t have jobs, there are no taxes to collect.
Tax revenues and public expenses need a certain amount of balance. It is unsustainable to spend money that doesn’t exist and has no hope of ever existing.

The immediate crisis comes first, then address the needs beyond survival.

Has no one on the far left read about Maslow?
NDP might argue that affordable medication is a need.

It is. But having an economy to generate enough taxes for revenue is a higher priority. That may sting those who are seeking immediate relief. But again, money doesn’t grow on trees. And we can only print or borrow so much.
That means pharmacare needs to wait.

How long? Well, the ability to get the economy back on track isn’t a certainty. We are dependent upon the US and their purchasing power for trade. We’ve spread out that risk by signing new trade agreements, but the success of US will help.
We also are not in control of the politics or economy of the US. So your guess is as good as mine since the nation seems to sit precariously on the verge of falling into open fascism.

But the government can influence our own economy.
Which is why child care was chosen as the next big ticket item. While it’s sold as a nod to feminism, it’s the most practical response. Giving half the population the ability to join the labour force without worrying about child care is a direct benefit to our economic capacity.
Quebec has already demonstrated that is fact not theory in spades.

The government has developed many new programs to address urgent needs. Think of it as the hotel costs, food and clothing and a new lap top for work capacity while I get back on my feet after my rental burns.
Moving to a new house is the goal, not moving back into a rental. So my accommodation is temporary. My environment is in chaos because I lost everything but the people I care about.

When my situation is more stable, then and only then do I continue on my intended path.
Not before.

It’s like NDP has never had a crisis before. Immediate needs for short & long term survival come before wish list items.

Or maybe it’s just demagogic populist rhetoric meant to smear a government dealt several huge crises one after another for the past 18 months.
Iran plane crash, national protest blockading trade (Wetʼsuwetʼen), and then covid.

But no excuses.

It’s amazes me how little critical thinking goes into these accusations. It’s just pure emotional triggering meant to enrage and frustrate people in distress.
But that’s not a very respectful way to treat people who are suffering.

However it is opportunist, disingenuous and populist.

The new NDP in a nutshell; Charlatans with a political power agenda.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sunshiny

Sunshiny Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @sunnshiiny

26 Jun
I think it’s appropriate to send this out again. With some information that I researched and compiled in 2019.
There’s a reason I don’t trust JWR. There’s a reason I have several issues with her veracity and portrayal as the victim of LPC racism and misogyny.

It’s not because I’m some partisan hack. It’s not that I support the Liberals unquestioningly.

I support their mandate.
Read 25 tweets
24 Jun
Just found out JWR blocked me.

No matter. I can use my other account to view her tweets.

But here she is accusing Carolyn Bennet of racism.
But question…

Isn’t the response to a post from the device owner on the bottom and not the top in messages?

Like this innocuous chat I had with my neighbour.

Doesn’t the response from me come below the comment my neighbour makes? Is there a way to reverse that order?
So if we look at JWR’s text, doesn’t she juxtapose her politically motivated question next to a question Carolyn Bennet asked about “pension?”

We’d have to see the previous text from JWR for context. Because the context is unverifiable without it.
Read 25 tweets
23 Jun
@LeftSplintered

I’m glad I found your Twitter site.

The same thing is happening in Canada, except we have a different political structure. Multi party system instead of two party system.

I’d like to read more, but perhaps we could share observations later.
What I’m witnessing in Canada is described by your info on Sunrise, Momentum and targeting youth.

Irrational and forceful to the point of bullying, two of the three national progressive parties are employing these tactics.
I watched Momentum training videos and I’m shocked. And seriously disturbed by what they are teaching.

But it certainly is making the bizarre behaviour from the two rogue political parties and their supporters make a lot more sense.
Read 4 tweets
22 Jun
Question:

Instead of advocating for homeless people to set up an encampment in a public park, why aren’t activists advocating for immediate shelter to be provided to people who have nowhere to go?
Living in a tent in a public park is not a right.

It’s a public health hazard and endangers the people living there as well as other citizens.

Human waste and garbage accumulates and creates a health hazard.

In a wealthy nation, shanty towns are not a solution.
If the shelter provided for the homeless is substandard, why aren’t activists demanding better resources accommodations for the homeless?

In what world is advocating for an encampment’s continued existence advocacy?
Read 25 tweets
22 Jun
Canada has been warned about China and their compromising tactics a long time ago.

Richard Fadden caused quite the scandal 11 years ago when he informed the public that several politicians in municipal & provincial govts were suspected of working to advance CCP interests.
Note: his warning came in 2010.

Harper signed the China Canada FIPA in 2012 and ratified it in 2014.

BC housing market had become untenable for the average resident by 2010.
Added crack down on Chinese corruption in China correlates to housing affordability problems in Vancouver and Toronto. Hmm. That’s interesting.
Read 23 tweets
21 Jun
More evidence of the outright attack on the most vulnerable.

How many more vulnerable people need to die or suffer greatly before those with privilege stand up to this ideological and corrupt punishing government?
We are reliving the lament of Martin Niemöller.
It’s obvious ‘speaking up’ is not enough.

As a society we are permitting UCP to attack the most vulnerable.

Voicing concern regarding how reprehensible it is does not provide us with absolution from permitting these policies and outcomes.

We are complicit.
Read 25 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(