1/n #SadarPranam to Ishvara within the author of this article.

Well, this very sentence itself is essentially the root of yoga & a Hindu idea. Explaining in detail in this thread.

Martial art was carried to China, from an Indian Bodhidharma, with roots in Kalaripayattu.
2/n The Sanskrit noun योग yoga comes from the Sanskrit root yuj (युज्) "to attach, join, harness, yoke".

Source: Asana Pranayama Mudra Bandha, pg 1

znakovi-vremena.net/en/Swami-Satya…
3/n What exactly is this union & joining about?

It is related to the "Qasi Cyclic Time" notion which is central to the Hindu idea, though it was part of Zoroastrianism too in the initial days.

One of the oldest reference to root of word "Yoga" appears in RigVeda 5.81.1.
4/n युञ्जते मन उत युञ्जते धियो विप्रा विप्रस्य बृहतो विपश्चितः। वि होत्रा दधे वयुनाविदेक इन्मही देवस्य सवितुः परिष्टुतिः॥१॥

Here the brilliant Aurobindo ji has translated 5.81.1 to be explaining how the awakened ones, say Yogis, try to merge themselves with the supreme.
5/n Then we have Keśin hymn (10.136) of RigVeda which talks of Keśin as being mystic ascetics.

They are the one who are wanderers, and have merged their minds with the supreme, say Parabrahm. They are one who are not harmed by beats or anyone for their friendly terms.
6/n Such friendly terms can only be found among Yogis and we still have first hand account of people explaining the tales of Himalyan yogis who live similar lives as Keśin.
7/n We also find the mention of yogic practice like Pranayama in Brihadaranyaka Upanishad (1.5.23).

The pratyahara is mentioned in Chandogya Upanishad (8.15).

The Jaiminiya Upanishad Brahmana talks of mantra repetition and control of the breath.
8/n The Chandogya Upanishad (8.15.1), gives the abstraction about going to Brahmaloka or the idea of being merging with Parabrahm.

This is nothing but the process of going beyond the Cycles.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Aabhas Maldahiyar 🇮🇳

Aabhas Maldahiyar 🇮🇳 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Aabhas24

18 Jun
Al-Kindi, a celebrated so called "Muslim" polymath said in 9th cen:

"Show me any proof or sign of a wonderful work done by your master Muhammad, to certify his mission, and to prove what he did in slaughter and rapine was, like the other, by Divine command."
One whom they celebrates as the first Islamic peripatetic philosophers, had questioned the foundations of Islam itself.

He further said:

"The result of all of this is patent to you who have read the scriptures and see how, in your book, histories are all jumbled together...
...& intermingled;an evidence that many different hands have been at work therein, & caused discrepancies,adding or cutting out whatever they liked or disliked. Are such,now,the conditions of a revelation sent down from heaven?"

Al Kindi had ripped the idea of Holiness of Qur'an
Read 4 tweets
14 Jun
1/n #SadarPranam to Ishvara within u @IndoIslamicPage

Is Indo-Islamic culture all about destruction of Hindu Structures & building things atop it?

Btw the inscription of lintel,tells that 27 Mandirs were toppled to build so called #QutubComplex

Follow thread for more info.
2/n This is the picture taken by John Murray in 1858 AD. Interestingly as per the British Archive records, it is Photograph of Rao Petarah's Temple.

It is a section from the Quwwat al-Islam mosque.

So in 19th century Brit record too is was Raja Prithviraj Temple.
3/n Moving further. ASI did publish detailed analysis of the Qutub Complex in 1926 (link: ignca.gov.in/Asi_data/41873…)

The document not only speaks about how complex was built by destroying Hindu Temples but also explains how Minar is Hindu is nature.
Read 4 tweets
13 Jun
You are absolutely wrong Ruchika.

Al-Biruni's radius was off by 15Km(~9.3 miles).

Now that I gave you radius, can u tell me using Al-Biruni's method (attached image 2) that what Circumference of earth should come.

Source: The Unesco Courier, June 1974
Also this must be noted that if you refer the writings of Al-Biruni directly, Arabic Miles= 1.225947 English Miles.
Source: Amelia Carolina Sparavigna. Al-Biruni and the Mathematical Geography. Philica, 2014

What kind of authors @scroll_in has? Horrible.
Well @tishasaroyan , should you wish to discuss the subject "Al-Biruni" you may come on Spaces. I'll be open to discuss the subject.
Read 4 tweets
10 Jun
1/n How peopling happened in world?

This thread shows the sequence rubbishing AIT through scientific evidences established so far.

Although it may change with time but the given researches state that Homo Sapiens first emerged in Africa some 300 KYA. (KYA=thousand years ago).
2/n This claim of Homo Sapiens emergence in Africa is based on thermoluminescence dating of remains & artifacts found at Jebel Irhoud, Morocco.

The studies were published in 2017.

The study can be read here. researchgate.net/publication/32…
3/n This is an image of remain from the Jebel Irhound.

More details including the skull contained in this report nature.com/articles/natur…
Read 40 tweets
9 Jun
There are lot lot more statements by Mahatma Gandhi asking Hindus to be pacifist against violent Muslim masses.

What is interesting that Gandhi in 20s did acknowledge Muslims to be bully & Hindus as coward too.
What I have been personally able to analyse about Gandhi that his prescription for Hindus were highly genocide oriented in nature although these actions of past also tells: Gandhi never expected Muslims to improve, he saw scope only in Hindus.
In quest to crit Gandhi we have given a lots of clean chit to Congress. There were many statements which were publicised by congress as being of Gandhi which he actually never said.
Read 9 tweets
8 Jun
No! Indeed a temple existed in Ayodhya & there are evidences about it.

1611, William Finch visited Ayodhya. Finch recorded the "ruins of the Ranichand [Ramachand] castle and houses" but made no mention of any mosque.
1634, Thomas Herbert described a "pretty old castle of Ramachand" which he described as an antique monument that was "especially memorable".

Flinch & Herbert make the case for a Mandir with reference to the castle.
1672, the appearance of a mosque at the site can be inferred because Lal Das's Awadh-Vilasa describes the location of birthplace without mentioning a temple.

So between 1634-72 the Mandir has gone & Mosque has appeared.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(