Generational curse do exists and mentioned in our scripture at multiple places.
They are of 2 types of Generational curse: #thread 1/11
1. External
Such kind of curse may come from a strong and austere personality like a Brahman or a saintly person.
There are couple of references in AnushAsanika Parva, Mahabharat as footnotes...
Once Brahma asked Surabhi to bear evidence before Vishnu to the statement that Brahma has seen the foremost part of Siva. Surabhi having given false evidence out of fear for Brahma was cursed by Siva that her offspring will eat unholy substances.
- Anushashan parva footnot
Most [in]famous curse was given by GAndhAri to bhagvaan Krishna, which was so sharp that, the whole Yadu race met with rather a too quick annihilation to be able to witness further generational curse.
This video explains that series of events in details.
Now let's look at the second the type of Generational curse!
2. Ancestral
That comes from the ancestors of the same family itself, also known as Pitru runa or Pitru dosha. Usually, our ancestors live in subtle forms with their mental desires still unfulfilled.
If such desires are not fulfilled by subsequent generations, then these desires are gradually transformed into curse and create various obstacles for ongoing generations.
One reason for such Pitru dosha is shortly discussed in Gita:
"And the hybridisation (Varnsa-shankara, intermix of the Varna) in the family leads the ruiners of the family into hell only. The forefathers of these fall down (into hell) because of being deprived of the offerings of food and water. " - Shree Gita 1.42
We may wonder, why some misdeed of our forefathers have to be paid by us? That's because, a major [material] part of our father gets born as our own self.
There are numerous references in ancient scriptures, which suggest that the father is born as a son/daughter.
Hence, in a way we can assume that our great-great forefather's [material] part has born our own selves.
Here is one such reference by Bhishma while discussing fair property distribution among son & daughter:
"Bhishma said, 'The son is even as one's own self, and the daughter is like unto the son. How, therefore, can another take the wealth when one lives in one's own self in the form of one's daughter?" - Mahabharat Anusasana Parva (13)
Notice : "The son is even as one's own self"
Common people giving curse should be ignored & the receiver of the curse should grant them a pardon.
and one should not use the abusive words , even curse words are abusive words. The reason is explained in this quoted thread.
He, Who is of a calm countenance and reposes on one which moves with curves(of snake- Lord Ananta)
Who has a lotus navel(from which Brahma manifested), and Who is the Lord of all Gods; Who is the support of this World and is as vast as the Sky; and Who is of colour of a Black Cloud and has beautiful and auspicious body parts.
He, Who is the beloved of Lakshmi and Who has eyes like lotuses; Who is always approached by Ascetics in their state of Meditation; I worship that Vishnu, Who pervades everywhere, He, Who exterminates the fear of this illusionary world, and Who is the sole Lord of all the worlds.
The number of people from each Varnas required to form a Kingdom (Monarchial state) in the Mahabharata
In Shanti Parva 85, Bhishma talks about this topic..
Bhishma said, "Thou art endued with great intelligence, O Yudhishthira! It is even so as thou sayest. 1/7
The person is very rare who is possessed of all those good qualities. To be brief, conduct like this (viz., the presence of all the virtues spoken of), is very difficult to be met with even upon careful search.
I shall, however, tell thee what kinds of ministers should be appointed by thee. Four Brahmanas, learned in the Vedas, possessed of a sense of dignity, belonging to the Snataka order, and of pure behaviour....
Differences between terms like Siddha, Sannyasi, Acarya, Muni ,Upādhyaya and Rishis?
Checkout this thread to know the difference:
Ācārya comes from the word Acharana, meaning to “implement” and “abide by”. 1/n
An Ācārya can be a guru and can also be a jñani.
However, the main difference is that an Ācārya himself takes up an ashram (from among the four ashrams) and implements and abides by its karmā so as to become a living example in performing the karmā associated with that ashram.
A good example is Śrī Śankaracharya, who was a jñani at such a young age, took up Sanyas:ashram and continued to retain in that ashram, implementing all its respective karmā.
By doing so, he stood as an example – paving the way for future generations.
1. Is it possible to detach your soul from your body? 2. How to differentiate Yoga from Dream?
The answer to 1st question is: yes, it is possible to to separate the soul or jivatma from the body. 1/9
Even one can enter another body through this process:
When the bonds of the mind caused by action have been loosened, one may enter the body of another by knowledge of how the nerve-currents function-
[Patanjali Yoga Sutra- 3.37]
First is, yoga is that state where all the activity of the mind ceases (PYS - 1.2).
So the idea that in yoga one must be somewhere thinking something is incorrect. If one is thinking something then he might be practicing yoga, but he is not in yoga.
Hindus regard it as an earthly manifestation of the goddess Tulsi, a consort of the god Vishnu. The offering of its leaves is mandatory in ritualistic worship of Vishnu and his forms like Krishna and Vithoba.
Read more in this thread...
It is considered holy as it has been blessed by Lord Vishnu himself and burns away sins of a person.
Tulasi plant on earth is actually a form of Laxmi. As per Devi Bhagavatam, due to a quarrel among Saraswati, Ganga, Laxmi, Saraswati cursed Laxmi to be born as a plant on earth
Laxmi being favorite of Vishnu, He then consoled Her by stating that everything had happened as predestined. So He told Her to go and be born and as a plant in India.
She will be known as Tulasi and will be able to purify all the three worlds