14 inserts
7 close-ups
5 medium to close shots
3 cutaways
1 wide shot
Distilled action can work. No master shot, overlapping editing, stretched out timeline. And yet, still awesome because:
-Clear causality
-Sustained visual momentum
-John Woo
The only wide shot here is used because Woo needs to pass on new spatial information. One character has changed position relative to the others, which leads to an action that would be incomprehensible without a shot establishing that fact. Less than a second long is enough.
Visual momentum depends on a dialogue between images. That means creating visual sentences that give rhythm to the scene. This is one such sentence: 3 shots, 1 general direction. The *feeling* of kinetic unity combined with the clear *understanding* of their diegetical meaning.
The way Woo stretches out time is seamless in that it never feels like he does on initial viewing. Here, Gina Gershon turns her head to avoid a bullet. 10 shots and maybe 7 bullets later, she's still completing her move. But it's never shocking.
The beauty of it is that we can never know for sure when Woo is showing us a new bullet being fired, or when he is showing us again the same one being fired from a different angle. It stimulates the senses but doesn't overwhelm. It makes it more exciting, grabs the attention.
This is a 26-second clip made up of 30 shots, and since the last shot is 5 seconds long, it's a 21-second action scene in 29 shots. It's never about how long the shots are. Always about how well they're framed, composed, blocked, and edited together.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The very first fight of RUROUNI KENSHIN (2012) is important because it serves two purposes: to introduce us to the Hitokiri Battōsai, and to serve as a reference to create contrast with later scenes. Therefore it must: showcase the hero's power, and instantly be seared to memory.
The fight opens with a close-up of the protagonist. It keeps things mysterious and intriguing, and tells the audience: this is who you must keep your eyes on. Pay attention to him. He then exits the frame from the right hand side. His movement marks the start of the battle.
Motion becomes the main driving force behind the scene from its first shot, and the second one confirms that: the sliding movement is continued through editing. A match-on-action, but in addition, the movement of the actor transforms into the movement of the camera itself...
HIGHLANDER holds a special place because of Mulcahy's fearless visuals. Critics said he made "an everlasting music video"... So what? That's *precisely* why the film endures, it tore the veil between two art forms. Look at this scene. Never a dull moment:
For Mulcahy, HIGHLANDER was an opportunity to continue what he’d done on his videos on a bigger scale, with less oversight. Cinema is a rich medium, and juxtaposing moving pictures can be done to achieve various affects. Sometimes the musicality of images overrides visual logic.
Look at the relationship between these shots. It doesn't matter if they don't connect seamlessly, the point is to keep the momentum going. Mulcahy insisted on having the rain and the backflips even though no one on set understood why. They got it when they saw the film.
I love how DIE HARD wastes no time in establishing its tone, hero, and plot. Takes only 15 shots (≈7 setups) and 90 sec to:
-Establish classic Hollywood codes
-Introduce three major character traits
-Introduce one major plot point
Let's go through them:
The first shot is that of an arrival, which is a common trope of classic Hollywood movies. It's no accident that the last shot will show a departure. McTiernan bookends his film like this to create the sense of being welcomed into the story. We feel at ease. We feel at home.
The second (!) shot starts introducing major character traits and plot points. It's rare enough to be noted. How many movies wait a whole act or more before we get to know something substantial about our protagonist? Well, we may not know our hero's name yet, but after a few...
What makes Hong Kong action movies so compelling? Why do we feel supercharged after watching them? To me, it's a combination of musical editing, impact-focused images, and the constant renewal of camera set-ups. Let's take a short example from YES, MADAM! (Corey Yuen, 1985):
The visual phrase dedicated to Cynthia Rothrock's fight ends with her impressive back kick to Dick Wei's face. With Corey Yuen, when a visual phrase ends, contrast is used to kick-start the following one. We left Cynthia on a horizontal slo-mo shot, meaning we jump to Michelle...
Yeoh's fight with a standard-speed, low-angle shot. The images contrast, but the movement is continuous: the last Cynthia frame and the first Michelle frame are similarly composed in terms of blocking, and the momentum is never lost. This creates a sense of continuity through...
The Chateau fight scene from MATRIX RELOADED remains one of the most impressively crafted pieces of action cinema I've ever seen: exciting, precise, meaningful, kinetic. Every detail in this scene is important. Its place in the story, its set, its props, its direction. Thread ⬇️
I remember some friends at the time complaining that this scene was pointless: at this stage in the series, Neo is omnipotent, invincible. Why show us a fight against nameless fighters? The answer lies in the images themselves. In the matrix, the colour red is associated with...
...truth. See: the red pill, the woman in red, etc. Neo bleeds 3 times while in the matrix, once each film. In the 1st and the 3rd film, he bleeds from the mouth when fighting Agent Smith. So the truth is spoken in red: "My name is Neo" / "Because I choose to". These words...
Late to the party so sorry if it's been said before but the Bruce Lee scene in ONCE UPON A TIME IN HOLLYWOOD is shot as a one take until the very moment Cliff throws Lee into the car. Plus, the set suddenly becomes empty for no reason. It could suggest unreliable recollection or
perhaps the fact that the scene suddenly becomes a fantasy, an imagined outcome to this encounter. Why would everyone but one extra disappear from the scene after the one take ends? That makes no sense story-wise, so the reason must be something else. Maybe Cliff convinced...
himself that he "beat" Bruce Lee and the images going through his mind reflect this fictionality. It's like the set becomes a hyper-set, the stage for a new play within the film, a form of meta-narrative signifier. 🤔