1/ UK: Delta variant:
What can we learn, and what can we not learn, from PHE reports?
About the IFR? flu at most
About vacciine effect on death? nothing
2/ See here IFR=0.1%, 0.3%
Why estimates differ?
Several explanations, but one we’ll need later: risk is not # death/# people. It is # deaths/# person-time.
Need to add up the number of days each person was observed to compute “rate” (epidemiology).
Risk is over people AND time.
3/ We don’t have time (days) for all 92,056 cases. We only have it for 11,250 (28 days per person).
Regardless, these are not all cases. By now it’s clear that 80-90% of infections are asymptomatic.
Therefore IFR must be << 0.3%
Flu. Or less.
Delta much less virulent than Alpha
1/
Peer review (unsolicited)
Another analysis of Israel data on vaccine effectiveness. Fully vaccinated vs. unvaccinated
Observation period: Jan 24-Apr 3
Bottom line: again, likely over-estimation of effectiveness. thelancet.com/journals/lance…
2/ Over the study period:
1)People shifted from unvaccinated to fully vaccinated.
2)Rate of infection was declining (peak Jan 20)
3/ Distribution of unvaccinated on the calendar is shifted to the left (time of HIGHER infection rate)
Distribution of vaccinated is shifted to the right (time of LOWER infection rate)
So, part of the difference between vaccinated & unvaccinated is due natural wave decline.
1/ Important question: Once infected, what is the effect of vaccination status on death/severity?
Here is relevant statistics from Israel data.
Disturbing observations on the early period after 1st dose.
2/ Table shows rate of death & severe disease, since the vaccination campaign began.
Notice that risks are higher in vaccinated than unvaccinated. That’s misleading. At any time, vaccinated were older than unvaccinated (and older, on average, in sequential vaccination groups.)
3/ The phenomenon is called confounding. Illustrated in a causal diagram. All comparisons are not valid. They don’t estimate effects.
1/ Theories & evidence of bias in Israel data on vaccine effectiveness. nejm.org/doi/full/10.10…
Theories: 1. Important endpoints (hospitalization, severe illness, death) included many patients with incidental positive PCR 2. Preferentially in unvaccinated
2/ All figures taken from Supplementary Appendix Figure S3. (The Y-axis scale seems wrong, but I assume it is just a labeling error)
Key figure: Time to hospitalization
Most patients were hospitalized within 1-2 days (!) of a first PCR swab that was found positive
Unexpected.
3/ Typical course much longer: symptoms->test->worsening symptoms-->hospitalization
What happened?
Many patients were likely tested in the ER. They showed up in severe enough condition, for which no outpatient PCR was done. Thus, their condition on admission was not COVID