Temps are rising but deaths are declining. Why?

Because more people die from cold than heat, and A/C:

- 5x more die of cold as heat, even in hot India

- Warming saves ~2x more people than it kills

- US halved heat deaths since 1960

@BjornLomborg

usatoday.com/story/opinion/…
All of those news stories including “explainer” stories we are seeing right now are grossly misleading because they deliberately *exclude* all of the relevant context that @BjornLomborg provided above

The media do the same on floods, forest fires, hurricanes, etc
As @AlexEpstein notes, humans took a dangerous climate and made it safe, we didn’t take a safe climate and make it dangerous

The idea that the climate was safe before humans caused climate change is an infantile fantasy & the Edenic foundation to a false, apocalyptic narrative
The apocalyptic climate narrative depends on gross ignorance of the infrastructure that protects us, from A/C to flood control to electricity

Is it a coincidence that the same people who mislead & terrify people about the weather also oppose A/C, flood control, & reliable power?
What overwhelmingly determines whether people die in heat waves is whether they have A/C — and thus cheap and reliable electricity — not whether temperatures reach 111° instead 109°, or whether there are 5 more days a year when temps go over 100°.
What overwhelmingly determines whether there are floods is whether there are flood control systems, not whether there’s few more millimeters of rainfall

What overwhelmingly determines whether fires destroy forests is whether they are well-managed, not a few more hot days.
Well-managed forests survive the heat

Where forest mismanagement is a *necessary* & *sufficient* cause of high-intensity fires, climate change is not

The well-managed Shaver Lake, where there was robust fire prevention, provided the proof last summer

forbes.com/sites/michaels…
How can we protect ourselves, and our children, from the alarmism, which causes anxiety/depression, and is used to justify policies that make energy/food expensive?

In a word, science. We’ve assembled the best-available science, which debunks alarmism

environmentalprogress.org/apocalypse-nev…
Is there a single book that debunks the alarmism in an entertaining and accessible way, using stories and characters to illustrate basic physical & economic realities, and praised by the worlds leading scientists and scholars?

Why yes there is! 😃

amazon.com/Apocalypse-Nev…
No book on the environment has ever been praised by a more prestigious and diverse group of scientists and scholars

Buy copies for yourself and loved ones today!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael Shellenberger

Michael Shellenberger Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ShellenbergerMD

25 Jun
Biden appears to have scored a major climate infrastructure victory but he didn't

In fact, he got fewer billions than Obama did in 2009, and it's a far cry from the multi-trillion Green New Deal

Why? Because of anti-nuclear Malthusian Progressives

michaelshellenberger.substack.com/p/the-real-rea…
Yesterday, Biden appeared to have scored a big climate policy victory in announcing a deal with Republicans to spend hundreds of billions on new infrastructure, including $73B for new solar and wind farms and $15B for electric vehicle infrastructure and electric buses.
But the total ends up being just $88B, which is less than the “clean tech” portion of the 2009 stimulus and a far cry from the trillions progressives demanded. The total for electric cars is less than 1/10th the $177B Biden requested. And there is no Clean Electricity Standard.
Read 51 tweets
25 Jun
"China is... running its solar industry using forced labor linked to an ongoing genocide. That simply can’t be tolerated or ignored. We can’t save the planet by increasing the suffering of the world’s most vulnerable people."

Bravo @joshrogin @washingtonpost
Also from @washingtonpost today

“‘Because they are all customers of Hoshine, the solar value chain is almost completely contaminated by forced labor’”

washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pac…
As I have been reporting, it won’t be cheap or easy to relocate or replicate China’s solar industry

“The availability of cheap coal energy & labor in Xinjiang enabled Chinese polysilicon makers to dominate
solar industry, making it difficult for manufacturers to replace them”
Read 7 tweets
23 Jun
Stop using climate to distract from your failure

- You *reduced* Calif. forests treated for fire by 50% (!) btwn 2019 - 2020

- You exaggerated by 690% the acres treated with fuel breaks & prescribed burns

- Bad forest mgmt not temps is *primary* cause of high-intensity fires
A major new investigation by @NPR of Calfornia's Gov. @GavinNewsom is damning:

"An investigation from @CapRadioNews and NPR’s California Newsroom found the governor has misrepresented his accomplishments and even disinvested in wildfire prevention."

capradio.org/articles/2021/…
"California’s response faltered under Newsom. After an initial jump during his first year in office, data obtained by CapRadio and NPR’s California Newsroom show Cal Fire’s fuel reduction output dropped by half in 2020, to levels below Gov. Jerry Brown’s final year in office."
Read 17 tweets
22 Jun
Nations spent trillions subsidizing solar & wind but the share of energy from fossil fuels is nearly unchanged, going from 80.3% to 80.2% over last 10 years

The reason is because unreliable, weather-dependent energies can’t replace reliable energies

ren21.net/wp-content/upl…
In a way this is an old finding

In 2017 my colleagues @energybants @Ramamurthy_Arun discovered that there was no correlation between solar or wind and the “carbon intensity” of energy — CO2 emissions per unit of energy — at an aggregated level

environmentalprogress.org/big-news/2017/…
By contrast, the deployment of nuclear & hydro was strongly correlated with declining carbon intensity of energy. Why? Because both are reliable, and can thus replace coal and nat gas plants, where solar panels & wind turbines cannot. They can only operate alongside fossil fuels.
Read 11 tweets
21 Jun
For decades people pointed out how toxic solar production & waste were but

- biased news media refused to investigate

- solar industry spread misinformation through @NRDC @SierraClub @Greenpeace

- @BlackRock @IRENA et al manipulated analyses

PROOF

michaelshellenberger.substack.com/p/why-bidens-c…
But there are no more excuses

Genocide & actual environmental justice is at stake

If you're capable of watching this video, then you're capable of understanding the inherently physical reason that renewables have massively negative environmental impacts

Energy-dense fuels require far less in the way of materials, and produces far less in the way of waste, compared to energy-dilute solar and wind

We think of solar panels as clean but there is no plan to deal with their toxic waste

quillette.com/2019/02/27/why…
Read 6 tweets
21 Jun
Bombshell new study published in @HarvardBiz Review finds that solar panel waste will make the electricity produced by solar panels *four times* more expensive than experts had predicted

Here's why everything they said about solar was wrong

michaelshellenberger.substack.com/p/why-everythi…
In 2018 I argued that solar panels weren’t clean & produce 300x more toxic waste than high-level nuclear waste. In contrast to nuclear waste, which is safely stored and never hurts anyone, solar waste threatens poor trash-pickers in sub-Saharan Africa.

forbes.com/sites/michaels…
An influential analyst, @solar_chase called my article, “a fine example of 'prove [renewable energy] is terrible by linking lots of reports which don't actually support your point..."

Read 35 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(