Just as "be yourself!" is terrible social advice to people whose genuine selves kinda suck, "treat company money like it's your own" is a recipe for corporate disaster. A thread.
Everyone's relationship with money is different. At various points in my life, my personal travel has been "first class is the only thing I book" as well as "hahaha who can afford to fly, we're driving to California. From Maine."
When a manager says "spend company money like it's your own," what they're really saying is "spend company money like I spend my own." And it's impossible to judge as a third party just what that looks like.
Put more directly, someone who grew up with Family Money and someone who grew up never knowing when their next meal would be have radically different approaches to money.
If you're hiring junior people, it's incumbent upon you to give examples.
Let's say you're going to re:Invent, and you don't book your hotel until a couple of weeks before. You can stay in a hotel on the strip for $800 a night, or you can stay six miles away at a Motel 6 for $150 a night.
You could argue either way. Don't make your staff do it.
Amazon famously only flies coach. The flight from Seattle to Australia is ~17 hours in the air, and lands at ~7AM local time.
"Customers wouldn't want us to spend money upgrading."
If you show up for a meeting looking punched awake, this customer prefers you stay home.
Later on in your career once you've got some seniority, the play changes somewhat (but requires privilege to pull off).
If you want me to spend time away from my family working on your thing? I will eat, travel, and sleep the way I want to. Don't like it? Go yourself.
Something I never really appreciated as an employee was how *expensive* it is to run a business. Staff cost a BOATLOAD.
The incremental expense of "traveling well" over "traveling via catapult" gets lost in the background noise.
What I do is tell my team to use their judgement BUT I ALSO GIVE REAL EXAMPLES.
"I took a domestic flight that was $400 one way to upgrade so I did it. The return flight's upgrade was $4400 so I didn't." ATL is a hole.
That means that if someone buys a $800 upgrade that I wouldn't have? I can't really complain about it, just give guidance for next time.
If someone ignores guidance and makes you think you need a stricter policy, there's a great chance you just need to fire someone instead.
I will now field questions from the audience and personal attacks from folks who work in Procurement.
We quote fixed fee for our projects. Our people travel on our dime / policy, not the client's.
Honestly, I think a couple of our clients were happier about that than the actual project, just because it was a fight they didn't need to wage internally.
We explicitly define whether it's in or out of scope internationally. Domestically if a $5K trip makes the client happier, there's not a lot of reason not to go.
Many of the big tech companies are forcing staff to go back to the office. I think this is shortsighted; you should make the company beg you to go back to working remote. A thread of advice from some of the worst colleagues I ever had:
Cherry MX blue switches in keyboards are noisy, but buckling springs are louder. You'll get used to them more quickly if you hum along to the sound of your keystrokes.
What's for lunch today? Your leftover fish from last night's dinner. Throw it in the microwave and reheat it. Ten minutes oughta do it.
I’m seeing several instances lately of @awscloud just handing customer information over to third parties without consent or notification.
Folks are asking for examples. First up, both my CFO and business partner received this last week.
Next, a program I'm involved in with AWS passed out a "benefit" to all participants from a third party. We were opted in to *all* of their marketing communications. I'm partial to the Italian option myself.
Amazon has a program where if you've got low-five-figures in cash and a decent credit score, they'll help you "bootstrap your delivery business." Details are at logistics.amazon.com
They'll get you set up with their technology, processes, and delivery fleet all branded with Amazon logos.
Let's stop and think for a second about how that might constrain your ability to uh... take on a second customer that isn't Amazon?
Wednesday's issue of lastweekinaws.com answers the question "starting from zero in a 'free' tier @awscloud account, how much spend can I incur in month 1 without buying RIs / SPs?"
There's some wiggle room, but ~$750m or so. Call it "only" $500m to be safe.
This of course presupposes that there aren't any lurking limits that'll get in my way. It's hard to say the way that I went about it, and I'm not bold enough to test it in *my* account.
I'm going to hope and trust that there are some internal alarms that would go off at @awscloud if a brand new account started tracking towards being their single largest customer in a matter of days, and would result in either a hard shutoff or at least a series of phone calls...
I have pushed a set of API credentials to a public repository. Oh no! Specifically at Mon Jun 21 23:08:12 UTC 2021.
I immediately received an email from @github after the push--to tell me that the authentication token for Github that I was using is out of date and should be updated. (This was called via their old "hub" CLI).
And at 17 past the hour I get my first call from a remote IP in the UK. It's a ListBuckets call.