Another stunning piece by @rowanjacobsen @techreview of a top coronavirus expert, Ralph Baric.

"[Baric] wants to know what barriers were in place to keep a pathogen from slipping out into Wuhan’s population of 13 million, and possibly to the world."

technologyreview.com/2021/06/29/102…
@rowanjacobsen @techreview I would like to remind how incredibly difficult it was to even raise the -possibility- much less the plausibility of a lab leak one year ago.

Today many experts are saying that they always said a lab leak was possible and should be investigated. When? Where?
@rowanjacobsen @techreview In my view, the "consensus" has only recently (May 2021) become reasonable. That a large portion of scientists and journalists are finally saying "Of course we need to investigate all possible scenarios, including a lab leak!"
@rowanjacobsen @techreview And it's unfortunate, the scientists who staked their reputations+careers to bring attention to lab origins over the past year are now painted as the unreasonable ones who "believe" in the lab leak theory.

We believe it should be investigated. That's what we've said for 1+ year.
@rowanjacobsen @techreview And indeed that's what a few scientists & journalists have been doing for months: investigating the #OriginsOfCovid as best as they can from the publicly available info and through the intelligence generated by sleuths.

It's not just belief. It's 1+ year of hard work.
@rowanjacobsen @techreview This is an urgent and important issue that impacts pandemic preparedness and pathogen research worldwide 🌎🌍🌏 The same type of research was again funded through EcoHealth Alliance but now done outside of China; project start 2020-06-17
grantome.com/grant/NIH/U01-…
@rowanjacobsen @techreview New EHA project in🇸🇬🇹🇭🇲🇾
"Identify, characterize and rank spillover risk of high zoonotic potential viruses.. archived wildlife samples.. wildlife surveillance.. identify novel viruses.. characterized to assess risk of spillover.. receptor binding, cell culture.. humanized mouse"
@rowanjacobsen @techreview So, what barriers are now in place to keep a pathogen from slipping out into Singapore, Bangkok, or 3 different Malaysian cities’ populations of 10s of million, and possibly to the world?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Alina Chan

Alina Chan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Ayjchan

1 Jul
To the scientists saying that the lab leak hypothesis has changed over the past year from manmade to lab escape…

The hypothesis didn’t change.

Your narrative did.
Please see a few of the receipts in this thread below. I have even more if you need a refresher.
Read 10 tweets
29 Jun
Timely article by @Schwartzesque on risky pathogen research.

I think the point that almost everyone can agree on is that the current framework+process for assessing potential pandemic pathogen work has to be completely revamped.
businessinsider.com/covid-pandemic…
@Schwartzesque This scientific commentary @T_Inglesby @mlipsitch was published 22 Jan 2020:

"this framework and its implementation should become transparent.. robustly pursue international engagement"

That same day we heard that Wuhan was going to be sealed 封城
journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/mS…
Now that more scientists are becoming able to process that Covid-19 might've (regardless of how likely) emerged due to research activities, it's time to transparently create a new set of functional review processes with non-scientist and international stakeholders.
Read 4 tweets
28 Jun
US intelligence should really release what they know and put to bed all the confusion once and for all.

Were there WIV staffers sick with Covid symptoms in Nov 2019? Did one of their wives die? Or is this intelligence not solid?
bloomberg.com/news/features/…
Dr Anderson was a visiting foreign scientist at WIV up to Nov 2019.

But we have this from @evadou @washingtonpost
"[WIV] records mention protocols for disclosing information to foreigners and the sealing of some research reports for up to two decades."
washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pac…
How many people in total worked at the WIV?

"there is a procedure for reporting symptoms that correspond with the pathogens handled in high-risk containment labs"

But what about BSL2 (not high-risk containment) at which the live SARSrCoV work was performed?
Read 12 tweets
27 Jun
To the people on twitter mad that @antonioregalado wrote a profile of me: I'm not asking anyone to do profiles of me. People around me consistently advise me not to agree to interviews and especially profiles because you have no idea what journalists are going to quote/write.
Journalists don't show you the piece before it is published. You can't tell them what to write or how to frame your quotes. I've gotten in trouble again & again.

Even up to the day before the profile was published, I was still worried that I would be portrayed as a conspiracist.
Thankfully that didn't happen. @antonioregalado was objective. He didn't let me get away with anything in the interrogation & got lots of quotes from scientists who disagree with me (scientifically &/or personally). The profile made me think about my missteps & how to do better.
Read 4 tweets
27 Jun
This might be the most extensive article written in support of natural origins of Covid-19 that I've seen. I think this was an incredibly well-written piece @factcheckdotorg @jjmcdona with well-rounded quotes from respected experts in the field.
factcheck.org/2021/06/sciche…
@factcheckdotorg @jjmcdona If I can summarize the top 3 points for natural origins, it would be these, according to the article and interviews with experts:

(1) There is no direct evidence of a lab accident or SARS2 having existed in a lab. Instead, we have observed SARS2-like viruses in nature.
(2) An early cluster of Covid-19 in Wuhan was based at a live animal market. The vendors might’ve hidden their illegal animals when they heard there was an outbreak. China has not tested enough animals to find the animal source of the outbreak.
Read 14 tweets
26 Jun
So... @LastWeekTonight @iamjohnoliver

@washingtonpost has been covering #LabLeak since Nov

@colbertlateshow @StephenAtHome @jonstewart talked about the novel coronavirus having the same name as the Wuhan institute (first name & last name)

@nytimes broke today

You up? 🧪🧪👩‍🔬
@LastWeekTonight @iamjohnoliver @washingtonpost @colbertlateshow @StephenAtHome @jonstewart @nytimes I have just been informed that the proper way of doing this is:

U up?
.@LastWeekTonight covered the growing risk of a natural pandemic this Feb.

It would be great if a future episode informs the public of the 21st century risk of a lab-based pandemic.

A pandemic in 1977 was lab-based. SARS classic leaked 6 times from labs.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(