Banning discrimination against sex workers is real, pervasive and incredibly dangerous. The fact is, there is no current legal barrier to a US bank saying “I won’t take your money” or “I won’t take money from @onlyfans” or suddenly closing your account.
And, thanks to the antis trafficking moral panic, it’s likely to get worse. The House is making trafficking a major priority in 2021, with several upcoming bills aimed at increasing restrictions or monitoring accounts.
Operation Choke Point, which required increased bank surveillance of “pornography” accounts under Obama, officially ended in 2017, but banks decided to keep doing it anyway.
Lack of banking isn’t just an inconvenience. When your account is frozen you can’t eat, or pay rent, and in an increasingly cashless society, it means you can’t access basic services like internet.
It means higher fees to exploitative financial payors to get your cash. It means you have to give an intermediary — a non-SWer — total control of your finances. And have no recourse if they exploit you.
Beyond immediate needs, it means you can’t get access to products that help you build equity — like business loans or insurance or a mortgage. Which keeps sex worker income unstable, and — thanks antis! — more vulnerable to exploitation.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Could not be more excited about the new season of Tabloid, hosted by @LuxAlptraum, which revisits the Pam and Tommy Sex Tape ... and the world it created. vulture.com/article/pam-an…
Deep in campaigns against revenge porn/NCII, it's hard to remember how blithely the internet treated stolen content — at least before The Fappening — Kim Kardashian, One Night in Paris, "Firecrotch," and how readily we blamed the victims.
Lux is a relentlessly nuanced chronicler of sex and commerce and culture, and I'd argue the best person to tackle this. There are few people I'm happier to get on the phone and talk about sex. If you don't follow @LuxAlptraum, DO IT NOW.
Germany is moving to block xHamster, YouPorn and other adult domains that don’t do stringent age-verification — including facial analysis and ID upload — FOR EVERY VISITOR. This is tremendously concerning. 1/ spiegel.de/netzwelt/netzp…
Not the least because it’s only the beginning. France has already threatened big sites with countrywide blocks (and prison!) if they don’t comply, and the EU has directed all of its member states to address the issue. The UK’s Online Harms Bill threatens more of the same. 2/
Adult content should be for adults, but for those of us who went through the process in the UK via the Digital Economy Act, we know the problems. Privacy, accuracy, and fear 3/
If you were wondering why new MasterCard regulations feel purposely difficult, and so similar to the recently defeated 2257 regulations, look no further than @NCOSE President Patrick Trueman. 1/
Patrick Trueman, the current President of @NCOSE, was previously the Chief of the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section at the Department of Justice in the late 80s. Shortly after the passage of 2257, his department began one of the largest porn crackdowns in US history. 2/
During Operation PostPorn, the FBI prosecuted about half of the largest adult distributors, and worked with LAPD to raid even more. He brags that if it weren't for the Clinton election, DOJ “would have succeeded in completely eliminating the adult industry.” 3/
If @ncose and @ExodusCry and the other ‘anti-trafficking’ ministries really wanted to stop exploitation, they’d start with access to banking and financial tools. @PayPal@CashApp@Venmo and @GooglePay routinely close sex worker accounts. As do banks.
This gives sex workers two options (three if you count ‘starve’). Work with a company that takes a high percentage of your revenue for the convince of paying you, or put someone else — a non-SWer — in charge of your money.
Here we go. @NickKristof calls for Paypal to stop working with adult companies — with no mention of the real ways CSAM is shared online. Because private social media channels and the Dark Web aren't of interest to the evangelicals he works with. nytimes.com/2021/04/16/opi…
His source again is Laila Micklewait, who — again — is not with Exodus Cry, an Evangelical organization that wants to stop sex work, but with "The Justice Defense Fund"
And just for good I-don't-care-about-actual-data measure, he throws in the terrible study from the British Journal of Criminology and *drumroll* entirely misrepresents it. Now it shows *actual* sexual violence.
The day after Mastercard unveils extensive consent verification for all content, @NCOSE says that verification doesn't actually matter *after all* — because it could be coerced.
Their answer: Criminal prosecution of those who sell adult content.
After all, according to NCOSE it could be ... Artificial Intelligence, and AI can't consent!
Don't know how many times we have to say this, but @NCOSE and @ExodusCry are not serious about #Traffickinghub. It's a means to an end to get adult content off the internet, and they'll move the goal posts every time. You can not negotiate with the American Taliban.