They:- Love is Love it can happen with anybody.
🌟 Well it's not true,If your upbringings are right&you mana is in control.
When Maharaj Dushyant was attracted towards Shakuntala what he said? Continue till end to read the beautiful story🌟
This is the story when Dushyanta met Shakuntala .Maharaj Dushyant began to like her. Dushyant was in confusion that she is the Daughter of Mahrshi Kanva{Because she lived in Kavashram} and therefore she is a brahmin.
King Dushyant said:- My mind does not dwell towards any other girl than that of a kshatriya " O soft - spoken { shakuntala ) you must know that I have full control over my heart , but I'm having affection towards you . Hence , you're a Kshatriya's daughter Tell me who are you ?
"My heart can't be attracted towards a brahmin Girl" then they found out she is the daughter of Vishvamitra and Menka{ A kshatriya}
This story is Found in Mahabharata and Abhigyan Shakuntalam
न मेऽन्यत्र क्षत्रियाया मनो जातु प्रवर्तते । तस्मात्प्रणिहितात्मानूं विद्दि माँ कलभाषिणि ।।
यस्यां में त्वयि भावोऽस्ति क्षत्रिया ह्यसि का वदा ।।
न हि मे भीरु विप्रायां मनः प्रसहते गतिम् । ( Mahabharata , Adi parva , chapter 92 )
Seeing& treating the girls of other caste as your sisters and mothers can bring unity too. But Sanghis have to pollute every Varna,they can't imagine any other stable relations bw Stri and Purush other than Marriage.
This thought seem too impossible to them.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Read this till end
Ks Lal in his book "the growth of scheduled tribes" writes that caste system is the reason why we survived and didn't suffer the fate of arabia and iran.
The caste organization is to the Hindu his club, his trade union, his benefit society, his philanthropic society. There are no work-houses in India and none are as yet needed"
(Sidney Low in his Vision of India' (pp. 262-263, 2nd ed. of 1907)
Abbe Dubois, after being in close touch with Hindus of all castes for 15 years as a missionary, remarks (in his work on the character, manners and customs of the people of India, translated into English and published in London in 1817):
Childish Talks Again.
Again he is quoting Puranas in competition with Vedas. Let's continue till end to understand this. I can quote puranas that mentions animal sacrifice(quoted) but let's start from basic.
I have explained this whole thing already in thread but still.
Mimansa स्मृत्याधिकरण (१/३/३) The authority of Smriti vachan is not valid if it goes against Vedas.
या वेदबाह्याः स्मृतयो याश्च काश्च कुदृष्टयः ।(Manu १२/९५)
Vyas smriti १/४ describes Vedas>>>Smritis>>puranas. Former blocks later.
An entry level gurukula student know such basics
This Manu- Vachan can solve all problems.
"तस्माद्यज्ञे वधोSवध:" in yajnas वध is अवध. Similarly Devi Bhagvat ३/२६/३३ "for yajnas Pashu Hinsa is not Hinsa" So half of problems gone.
Don't try to misinterpret medhatithi or cry about Adulteration. This one is from Kulluka Bhashya.
Here Mahidhara explains the meaning of words in 22 almost similar words are used in 23. So people can note them. Dayanand uses derivate meaning which is not valid.
Now continue
Ashvamedha is सर्ववाचात्मक as stated in Shukla yajurveda shatpath brahmana,All type of Speeches are made there. During Yajna the meaning of mantra is not Spoken.
🌺A friend sent this Today🌺
Continue till end,Let me show you what happens when people who can't even conduct Sandhyavandanam properly try to comment on Ashvamedha etc.
At first look at the historical aspect. First One is from Valmiki ramayana Balkanda /Chapter 14. Ashva was sacrificed there, Beloved Gitapress deliberately tried to made it "fruit" in their translation but it has nothing to do with ashvamedha. Here are the comnentaries
Yuddhishthira in Ashvamedic parva too did the same thing,Now let's back to the parts related to the post.
Impotent political Hindus instead of answering or doing something stirct against these degenrates,they try to Validate their $exuality using our sanatana dharma.
Continue with this thread , I'll clarify some(almost all claims) related to L¢B£Q& Hinduism.
Before clearing all their claims lets understand some basics .
• Vedas have Injuctions only for male and female couples ( विवाह सूक्त ) , Only masculine and feminine terms are used . there is no place for inter$exual marriage . It's completely against Vedas .
• Manusmriti,Narad smriti,Vishnu Smriti
Describes strict punishment for a man having sex with man , or a women having sex with a virgin girl,Two virgins having.
Punishment:- To outcaste them ,cut their fingers (even if not Literal it's a sin) Manusmriti 8 / 369-370,11 / 174
His line that "Dharma is higher than Gods"
Gods were respected because they followed Dharma?
Okay then your God is bound by some pre existing morality he is not omnipotent and he is not the always existing then?
In bhagvadgita 18/66 सर्वान धर्मान परित्यज्य।all the rituals etc
Again Just to surge the life in rayta wing many people came with stupid logic "Padma puran mentions Shiva as Giving boon to him"
Okay so?,There is Kalpa-Bheda. From this we can't reject that Brahma gace boon
In vishnu purana too "ब्रह्मणो वरदर्पितः" is used.