Childish Talks Again.
Again he is quoting Puranas in competition with Vedas. Let's continue till end to understand this. I can quote puranas that mentions animal sacrifice(quoted) but let's start from basic.
I have explained this whole thing already in thread but still.
Mimansa स्मृत्याधिकरण (१/३/३) The authority of Smriti vachan is not valid if it goes against Vedas.
या वेदबाह्याः स्मृतयो याश्च काश्च कुदृष्टयः ।(Manu १२/९५)
Vyas smriti १/४ describes Vedas>>>Smritis>>puranas. Former blocks later.
An entry level gurukula student know such basics
This Manu- Vachan can solve all problems.
"तस्माद्यज्ञे वधोSवध:" in yajnas वध is अवध. Similarly Devi Bhagvat ३/२६/३३ "for yajnas Pashu Hinsa is not Hinsa" So half of problems gone.
Don't try to misinterpret medhatithi or cry about Adulteration. This one is from Kulluka Bhashya.
Bhagavatam 11/21/29-30 also does the Nishedh of Hinsa that is "राग प्राप्त".
Similar is the story with Mahabharaa,all that is written there is to do the nishedh of रागप्राप्त हिंसा.
I already knew the verses he is going to quote, hence I mentioned it all before him.
Not every Yajnya but only few Somyaga,Jyotishtoma, Ashvamedha mentions animal sacrifice.
We are Smartas we don't even take water from the hands of meat eaters but Yajna is a whole diff paradigm with अपूर्वसाधनत्व. Killing doesn't mean eating.
So if you are seeing the Ninda of Animal killing in Itihasa Purana then it has to be interpreted in Vedic way otherwise those words will simply be anti-vedic .
At a time parts of verified itihasa like Mahabhrata i.e. " gita was "fake" .Now he is using Puranas to prove himself right
His problem is simple He has too much effect of Agnivrat,ankur arya,rahul arya. Vedas do not matter to him his silly emotions does.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Here Mahidhara explains the meaning of words in 22 almost similar words are used in 23. So people can note them. Dayanand uses derivate meaning which is not valid.
Now continue
Ashvamedha is सर्ववाचात्मक as stated in Shukla yajurveda shatpath brahmana,All type of Speeches are made there. During Yajna the meaning of mantra is not Spoken.
🌺A friend sent this Today🌺
Continue till end,Let me show you what happens when people who can't even conduct Sandhyavandanam properly try to comment on Ashvamedha etc.
At first look at the historical aspect. First One is from Valmiki ramayana Balkanda /Chapter 14. Ashva was sacrificed there, Beloved Gitapress deliberately tried to made it "fruit" in their translation but it has nothing to do with ashvamedha. Here are the comnentaries
Yuddhishthira in Ashvamedic parva too did the same thing,Now let's back to the parts related to the post.
Impotent political Hindus instead of answering or doing something stirct against these degenrates,they try to Validate their $exuality using our sanatana dharma.
Continue with this thread , I'll clarify some(almost all claims) related to L¢B£Q& Hinduism.
Before clearing all their claims lets understand some basics .
• Vedas have Injuctions only for male and female couples ( विवाह सूक्त ) , Only masculine and feminine terms are used . there is no place for inter$exual marriage . It's completely against Vedas .
• Manusmriti,Narad smriti,Vishnu Smriti
Describes strict punishment for a man having sex with man , or a women having sex with a virgin girl,Two virgins having.
Punishment:- To outcaste them ,cut their fingers (even if not Literal it's a sin) Manusmriti 8 / 369-370,11 / 174
His line that "Dharma is higher than Gods"
Gods were respected because they followed Dharma?
Okay then your God is bound by some pre existing morality he is not omnipotent and he is not the always existing then?
In bhagvadgita 18/66 सर्वान धर्मान परित्यज्य।all the rituals etc
Again Just to surge the life in rayta wing many people came with stupid logic "Padma puran mentions Shiva as Giving boon to him"
Okay so?,There is Kalpa-Bheda. From this we can't reject that Brahma gace boon
In vishnu purana too "ब्रह्मणो वरदर्पितः" is used.
🌺+A thread about the interpolation propaganda used by avedic sects and peak escapists+🌺
Continue with me till the end,It is going to be a long thread...
Average RW Hindu will not study under an acharya he'll rather make unnecessary noise. The texts will be called out of date or adulterated.
Those who proclaim the adulteration in scriptures will be called as gurus and Scriptural+hard working people will be called names.
This is the reason why Hindu society is falling and this is why Hindu society will fall further. When things are not understood, they declare them as adulterated
🌺Ask these to people who cry about interpolation in texts when it doesn't match their ideology:-