It must be one of the rules of "Art of War" to change the actual field of battle while appearing to still be engaged.
The assumption in our politics is that the sides are fundamentally in agreement re core values.
To fight on that premise is to have lost before the fight.
While one side is tangled in exasperated attempts to make congruent utterly discongruous points gives them the advantage to drive truckloads of harm through the gap.
There are far too many examples to list... McConnell's shifting rational &deviousness re the Supreme Court is one.
Another is the entire Jan6 debacle. How is it possible anyone, of any party, would not want to get to the bottom of such a momentous event?
Well, that assumes that all the parties are essentially devoted by their oath & patriotism to the country & its essential well-being.
That this is not the case is precisely the matter exampled in the first frame of this post.
The parties are not talking about the same thing, while using the same words to mean very different things.
It is confusing if you do not understand this.
IMO it is one of the basic
reasons the Dem's are consistently flummoxed by the 'Pubs.
When the 'pubs are in power, they do their will without the simplest of regard to the 'dems concerns.
When the 'dems are in power, they try to appeal to the 'better angels', find compromise, to "reason together".
The 'pubs tie up the 'dems trying to make sense out of nonsense... Meanwhile the 'pubs keep tightening their noose around the neck of the country.
The voter suppression laws are an extreme, and egregious example.
The 'pubs cannot win a basic, fair, democratic election...
They know it... and so they do what they are doing... (See @ezraklein for some excellent detailing of this point).
The filibuster. Infrastructure. Etc. The 'pubs have zero intention of participating in the good of the country.
How many attempts did the 'pubs even try re infrastructure while they were in power?
Precisely.
It is a card. A play. A diversion.
And they will keep playing it until the 'dems stop putting their 'money' down, and losing it.
Pelosi seems to finally ready to make that move.
Never forget: The Driving Principle of the Republican Party has long been and is now: To get and retain power.
It is only recently that it is appropriate to add
"At any cost".
And the cost they are willing to pay is high.
Nothing less than gutting the American Experiment.
Another price the present day Republicans are willing to pay:
Inculcating extraordinary ignorance into their followers.
This is another long line that needs attention. It is part of the ploy: to create a cult-like group of believers, in this case, in awe and submission to Trump.
Trump, for some unexplainable reason, (thus this thread), retains his grip on the Republican Party.
In order to do that, it is a prerequisite to limit the information available to your tribe. Get your info exclusively from the approved voices. Do not stray...
Do not allow yourself to be confused by unauthorized facts or points of view.
When this becomes a requirement of belonging... then you truly are entering into cult/tribal territory.
So this by @paulkrugman is particularly relevant and deeply concerning:
"Closed-mindedness and ignorance have become core conservative values, and those who reject these values are the enemy, no matter what they may have done to serve the country."
To conclude, but not finish: it is the reason nothing makes sense. Because those we are trying to communicate with are devoted to their cause, and their cause demands their allegiance in the form of their ignorance.
Everything you think you know about the 'Pubs, that they are pro-military, anti-russian, strong on defense, for the police, conservative economically... make your list...
There is none of it that is actually true.
Their positions have become malleable to the need of the moment.
Couple this with the RightWing/GQP version of "news dissemination and you end up w a modern Mini-True... that is as effective with their memory hole in changing their positions from one moment to another as anything Orwell ever imagined.
Know what we are actually dealing with.
And act and respond accordingly.
The lessons and examples are piling up.
They ought not be dismissed. Nor should they being engaged as if the battles are real.
Find the actual field of battle and focus effort there.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@heavyblankey@tommy_pane 1. Here is the post that has a succinct explanation. 2. I had similar confusion re the title... it does not say what it means... Academics! Apparently this is an idea first discussed in the 70s 3. In short, it means there are racial issues that have been in play fr the beginning
@heavyblankey@tommy_pane 2/ Why this is controversial eludes me. It is pretty obvious. As such it is uncontroversial that deep racism was embedded into the founding of the country. Not only blacks, but Indians. It is embedded in the constitution. And is manifest throughout American history.
@heavyblankey@tommy_pane 3/ That said seems the problem comes when trying to discuss that in terms of today. And conflating the systemic racism that is in the laws, customs and constitution w individuals who do not like being called racist.
That is where it gets complicated. IMO.
@tommy_pane GP is barely readable it is so full of tripe. The comments even more so.
I esp "enjoy" how the Trumpers have to find some off to the side detail to magnify into a mountain and then use that to insinuate "see...EVERYTHING THE ANTI TRUMP PEOPLE ARE SAYING IS WRONG..LOOK AT THIS".
@tommy_pane 2/ In the case of this article it is the Steele report. And in particular the "dossier’s most explosive claims".
Elevating the 'pee pee tape' as if this were the central and most important claim in that report is so disingenuous as to be laughable... which it is.
@tommy_pane 3/ 1st. The Steele report was never proposed as conclusive. It was a research report of issues to be followed up on. Some of the details have been validated others not, or inconclusive, as the report quoted says.
The important claim in the report was the Russia involvement in
@JakeLobin "It was a bright cold day & the clocks were striking 13"
We ought not be amazed or confounded by the cult-sotted "GOP" party & their compliant members with their staggering lack of rational consistency.
What is true at this very moment may have been false only a moment ago.
@JakeLobin 2/ Take any issue of substance, past or present, there will be a head-snapping flip. Just about the time that one settles it, flip again.
It takes a well oiled gimbal for a brain to adroitly follow what is the party line now. Not yesterday. Not tomorrow.
That to be determined.
@JakeLobin 3/ That is what 'memory holes' are for.
One day Republican leaders may strongly condemn Trump for his role in inciting insurrection. Today, it was just a bunch of tourists. Deny that? You are summarily drummed out of the party.
"How many fingers Winston?"
"How many Liz Cheney?"
@Politics_PR Let nothing trouble the crystalized beliefs
Anything that muddles the mind w facts or reality is to be ignored & forgot as soon as possible.
It never happened.
The only thing that is happening is Trump. The key to the party's getting of power.
The question is why does it work?
@Politics_PR 2/ It is not a very pleasant question.
It indicts an incredibly large percentage of the population that has gone into the fog bank that is Trumpism.
It will be increasingly hard, & embarrassing, to admit mistake. And so an error will codify into a 'religion'...
@Politics_PR 3/ And so an error will codify into a 'religion', which may be sufficient to create a new (and old) fundamental split as severe as the original one that birthed the Civil War.
And, in fact, energized by some of the very same axiomatic values & beliefs.
@tommy_pane I have read your reply. A couple of times.
I'll forebear the puzzled response. Other than to notice your amazing (to me, really it is banal, obvious, and expected by now) ability to contort basic facts into a shape that solicits a picture of a seriously gerrymandered district.
@tommy_pane 2/ What you have to ignore, & what you have to "interpret" in order to buttress your argument is so comprehensive there is nothing left of the original facts.
Your assertions/conclusions are so divorced from the facts/reality that it stuns the ability to actually engage.
@tommy_pane 3/ Which I suppose is the point of a 'religious' devotion. There is no way to contradict a "miracle". Beliefs override knowledge/science/facts.
Your beliefs are impregnable.
Which is fine. It is part of the liberty you(we) have. But it doesn’t allow for meaningful discussion
A PSA for all those who post Tucker Carlson videos and outrages:
His network argues that he is unbelievable, and the judge agrees.
Take nothing he says as meaningful of anything but absurdity and bullshit.
U.S. District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil: [accepting] arguments of Fox's lawyers: The "'general tenor' of the show should inform a viewer that [Carlson] is not 'stating actual facts' about the topics he discusses..is instead engaging in 'exaggeration' & 'non-literal commentary.' "
"Fox persuasively argues, that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statement he makes.