We have over 270+ portfolio companies @HustleFundVC now of which, I'm the point of contact for.
People often ask me how do I have time to take so many meetings??
Here's my secret and an unpopular tactic...I relentlessly cut mtgs.
Here's how / why / and gains I've seen >>
1) First, the pros and cons of mtgs:
Pros:
-feel connected w/ someone
Cons:
-inefficient time use to receive ideas
-inefficient way to do actions
-introduces weird biases
2) So given this, if you need to build rapport w/ someone, then you should definitely take the mtg. In fact you should take lots of mtgs!
This could be for:
-building morale w/ a teammate / founder / etc
-building a relationship w/ someone you're trying to recruit for something
3) E.g. if one of my founders is going through a co-founder breakup, I definitely want to meet.
4) E.g. OR, if you're hiring someone and you KNOW you want to hire that person, you definitely should spend time meeting the person.
I asked @will_bricker and @mariarotilu to meet me every month (!!) because I was so convinced I wanted to hire them!
5) However, these situations are actually fairly uncommon.
A more common situation is for ppl to meet when they really just want to take a course of action.
E.g. Often my founders want investor intros. We don't need to meet about that -- I can just whip those out async.
6) In addition, if you're receiving ideas, the most efficient way to process ideas is:
reading >> listening to audio / watching video at fast speed >> having a conversation
7) So, another common situation where you are mostly receiving ideas is where you are considering many ppl for something. Such as a job
Let's say you have a job opening and you want to consider hundreds of candidates. You don't know yet if you want to spend time w/ any of them.
7b) In considering candidates, it is better NOT to meet and to first communicate via reading / voice / video async.
This saves time for the candidate when you weren't serious about him/her in the first place. And, it allows you to hold conversations with many ppl.
8) Similarly, when I talk to startups, if I meet with a founder, I'm actually *pretty sure* I want to invest already by the time I get to the mtg.
Otherwise, if I'm not sure, it's just better to talk first via reading / voice / video async.
9) I'll often ask qs over email. Ppl can send me a loom video or respond at their leisure.
Async videos and voice mails are fast ways of responding without a mtg and often get transcribed for easy reading for the recipient.
10) All of these examples are similar to sales -- where a sales team will qualify a lead first by email usually and *before* meeting with warm leads.
But ppl who hire or invest often don't do this qualification process. Why?
11) I think ppl are often tempted to have a meeting with cold leads in the hiring or the investing context, because they want to:
-be polite to the recommender / referrer
-or think they could be convinced that a "cold lead" could turn into a deal
12) I think one of the most polite things that anyone can do is not waste anyone's time! :) If you're already a no going into the mtg, then you're going to be a no coming out of the mtg.
It would be better for all to just not meet.
13) I also think that if a candidate - whether for a job or a startup - cannot communicate their ideas clearly over written / voice / video, then that's a problem.
At a job or in running a company, writing >> pitching or interviewing.
14) Moreover, as a society, we put too much weight on pitches & interviews. This is how we introduce weird implicit biases - on how ppl look, how charismatic they are, etc.
It is actually more fair to do most of your assessment via reading / writing / voice async than via mtgs.
15) I often think about all those ppl who interview well but didn't quite pan out so well at the actual job.
Meanwhile, there are many times when that introverted person whom you took a chance on (who didn't interview well) rocked the job.
This actually happens quite a bit.
16) So for all of these reasons, I've been able to save a lot of time by cutting mtgs:
-transactional things -> just do the action
-qualify leads -> Q&A over email / async voice & video
-remove weird biases -> incl async communications as a larger part of the assessment
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1) The red line represents the median valuation that founders *asked for* when applying to Hustle Fund.
You can see that last summer during COVID, valuations that ppl were requesting took a real dive.
2) I often say that valuations are not about progress or traction but are about supply and demand. Supply of your fundraising round and demand from investors.
The companies who were applying last summer were not any "worse" than usual -- the market of investors simply dropped.
Today's tweet storm is about tranching your fundraise -- esp at pre-seed and seed to get momentum on your raise.
It's a topic I've lightly touched upon before but here are the tactics and reasons to do this.
Read on >>
1) First, the concept of a fundraising "round" is basically dead at the early stages (pre-seed / seed / post-seed). Most of the rounds I'm seeing get done are on SAFEs or notes. Even from well-known larger firms.
2) This is great for entrepreneurs because it means that you don't need a lead to raise money. You can just agree on a cap / discount / and amount with any investor and can sign and wire with no legal costs.
Just download the SAFE on the YC website and mutually sign.
Today's tweet thread is about business model angles that have worked well.
It's often hard to know what to try and how to start. What business model angles work?
1) Find a free product / service to offer and get paid by someone else.
E.g. a lot of big DTC health companies offer a free service or prescription that is paid for by insurance.
If it's a need-to-have product or service that's free, it's generally a no-brainer to sign up for.
2) Give or save someone money and take a % of it.
E.g @ArdiusTech helps you find free R&D tax credits. @ClaimcompassEU helps you find $$ that airlines owe you. Both find you free money and take a % of it.
2) Taking a step back, where did all of this start?
It actually started more than a decade ago when I noticed so many friends running around writing $1k angel checks. I'd always thought you needed to be super rich to be an angel, but that isn't the case.