We have over 270+ portfolio companies @HustleFundVC now of which, I'm the point of contact for.

People often ask me how do I have time to take so many meetings??

Here's my secret and an unpopular tactic...I relentlessly cut mtgs.

Here's how / why / and gains I've seen >>
1) First, the pros and cons of mtgs:

Pros:
-feel connected w/ someone

Cons:
-inefficient time use to receive ideas
-inefficient way to do actions
-introduces weird biases
2) So given this, if you need to build rapport w/ someone, then you should definitely take the mtg. In fact you should take lots of mtgs!

This could be for:
-building morale w/ a teammate / founder / etc
-building a relationship w/ someone you're trying to recruit for something
3) E.g. if one of my founders is going through a co-founder breakup, I definitely want to meet.
4) E.g. OR, if you're hiring someone and you KNOW you want to hire that person, you definitely should spend time meeting the person.

I asked @will_bricker and @mariarotilu to meet me every month (!!) because I was so convinced I wanted to hire them!
5) However, these situations are actually fairly uncommon.

A more common situation is for ppl to meet when they really just want to take a course of action.

E.g. Often my founders want investor intros. We don't need to meet about that -- I can just whip those out async.
6) In addition, if you're receiving ideas, the most efficient way to process ideas is:

reading >> listening to audio / watching video at fast speed >> having a conversation
7) So, another common situation where you are mostly receiving ideas is where you are considering many ppl for something. Such as a job

Let's say you have a job opening and you want to consider hundreds of candidates. You don't know yet if you want to spend time w/ any of them.
7b) In considering candidates, it is better NOT to meet and to first communicate via reading / voice / video async.

This saves time for the candidate when you weren't serious about him/her in the first place. And, it allows you to hold conversations with many ppl.
8) Similarly, when I talk to startups, if I meet with a founder, I'm actually *pretty sure* I want to invest already by the time I get to the mtg.

Otherwise, if I'm not sure, it's just better to talk first via reading / voice / video async.
9) I'll often ask qs over email. Ppl can send me a loom video or respond at their leisure.

Async videos and voice mails are fast ways of responding without a mtg and often get transcribed for easy reading for the recipient.
10) All of these examples are similar to sales -- where a sales team will qualify a lead first by email usually and *before* meeting with warm leads.

But ppl who hire or invest often don't do this qualification process. Why?
11) I think ppl are often tempted to have a meeting with cold leads in the hiring or the investing context, because they want to:

-be polite to the recommender / referrer
-or think they could be convinced that a "cold lead" could turn into a deal
12) I think one of the most polite things that anyone can do is not waste anyone's time! :) If you're already a no going into the mtg, then you're going to be a no coming out of the mtg.

It would be better for all to just not meet.
13) I also think that if a candidate - whether for a job or a startup - cannot communicate their ideas clearly over written / voice / video, then that's a problem.

At a job or in running a company, writing >> pitching or interviewing.
14) Moreover, as a society, we put too much weight on pitches & interviews. This is how we introduce weird implicit biases - on how ppl look, how charismatic they are, etc.

It is actually more fair to do most of your assessment via reading / writing / voice async than via mtgs.
15) I often think about all those ppl who interview well but didn't quite pan out so well at the actual job.

Meanwhile, there are many times when that introverted person whom you took a chance on (who didn't interview well) rocked the job.

This actually happens quite a bit.
16) So for all of these reasons, I've been able to save a lot of time by cutting mtgs:

-transactional things -> just do the action
-qualify leads -> Q&A over email / async voice & video
-remove weird biases -> incl async communications as a larger part of the assessment

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Elizabeth Yin

Elizabeth Yin Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @dunkhippo33

2 Jul
A # of friends who have had success w angel investing have asked me whether they should start a microfund.

There are reasons to do it & also not to but today’s thread is strictly about the economics.

Tl;dr most fund mgrs - even the best - won’t make much $$.

Read on >>
1) When most ppl say VCs are rich, they are really talking about big vcs.

In fact, many microfunds have a worse cash position than many of the startups they back!
2) Most fund mgrs get paid on a 2 and 20 model.

The 2 represents 2% - this is the budget of the fund.

So a $10m fund * 2% yields $200k in budget every yr for 10 yrs.

This budget covers salaries but also marketing, travel, etc
Read 17 tweets
24 Jun
Today's tweet thread will share some data that we've collected @HustleFundVC about the startup landscape that we shared at our LP mtg in April.

What did valuations look like last year? How do they differ by geo?

Thanks to @will_bricker for pulling this together!

Read on >>
1) The red line represents the median valuation that founders *asked for* when applying to Hustle Fund.

You can see that last summer during COVID, valuations that ppl were requesting took a real dive.
2) I often say that valuations are not about progress or traction but are about supply and demand. Supply of your fundraising round and demand from investors.

The companies who were applying last summer were not any "worse" than usual -- the market of investors simply dropped.
Read 13 tweets
23 Jun
Today I got to catch up with a @HustleFundVC portfolio co that got to $1m+ runrate in less than a year. 🤯

I'm so impressed with this team.

Read on to see how they did this >>
1) Some context - this is a company we incubated at the start of the pandemic. That said, < $500k in total has gone into the company.

So, this co has been incredibly lean and only raised most of that more recently.
2) T = 0. The team identified the problem and just started talking with wouldbe customers.

No product.

They started selling a service and mostly manually fulfilled it in an "agency-like way".
Read 10 tweets
14 Jun
Today's tweet storm is about tranching your fundraise -- esp at pre-seed and seed to get momentum on your raise.

It's a topic I've lightly touched upon before but here are the tactics and reasons to do this.

Read on >>
1) First, the concept of a fundraising "round" is basically dead at the early stages (pre-seed / seed / post-seed). Most of the rounds I'm seeing get done are on SAFEs or notes. Even from well-known larger firms.
2) This is great for entrepreneurs because it means that you don't need a lead to raise money. You can just agree on a cap / discount / and amount with any investor and can sign and wire with no legal costs.

Just download the SAFE on the YC website and mutually sign.
Read 21 tweets
8 Jun
Today's tweet thread is about business model angles that have worked well.

It's often hard to know what to try and how to start. What business model angles work?
1) Find a free product / service to offer and get paid by someone else.

E.g. a lot of big DTC health companies offer a free service or prescription that is paid for by insurance.

If it's a need-to-have product or service that's free, it's generally a no-brainer to sign up for.
2) Give or save someone money and take a % of it.

E.g @ArdiusTech helps you find free R&D tax credits. @ClaimcompassEU helps you find $$ that airlines owe you. Both find you free money and take a % of it.
Read 14 tweets
27 May
Since I got a lot of qs about $1k investment checks, I want to unpack this in today's thread.

Who is writing $1k investment checks? Why? Aren't angels rich? And who is taking these checks? And why? Isn't it a waste of time?

Read on >>
1) First some context - this is the thread that sparked all these qs:

2) Taking a step back, where did all of this start?

It actually started more than a decade ago when I noticed so many friends running around writing $1k angel checks. I'd always thought you needed to be super rich to be an angel, but that isn't the case.
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(