1) The red line represents the median valuation that founders *asked for* when applying to Hustle Fund.
You can see that last summer during COVID, valuations that ppl were requesting took a real dive.
2) I often say that valuations are not about progress or traction but are about supply and demand. Supply of your fundraising round and demand from investors.
The companies who were applying last summer were not any "worse" than usual -- the market of investors simply dropped.
Today's tweet storm is about tranching your fundraise -- esp at pre-seed and seed to get momentum on your raise.
It's a topic I've lightly touched upon before but here are the tactics and reasons to do this.
Read on >>
1) First, the concept of a fundraising "round" is basically dead at the early stages (pre-seed / seed / post-seed). Most of the rounds I'm seeing get done are on SAFEs or notes. Even from well-known larger firms.
2) This is great for entrepreneurs because it means that you don't need a lead to raise money. You can just agree on a cap / discount / and amount with any investor and can sign and wire with no legal costs.
Just download the SAFE on the YC website and mutually sign.
Today's tweet thread is about business model angles that have worked well.
It's often hard to know what to try and how to start. What business model angles work?
1) Find a free product / service to offer and get paid by someone else.
E.g. a lot of big DTC health companies offer a free service or prescription that is paid for by insurance.
If it's a need-to-have product or service that's free, it's generally a no-brainer to sign up for.
2) Give or save someone money and take a % of it.
E.g @ArdiusTech helps you find free R&D tax credits. @ClaimcompassEU helps you find $$ that airlines owe you. Both find you free money and take a % of it.
2) Taking a step back, where did all of this start?
It actually started more than a decade ago when I noticed so many friends running around writing $1k angel checks. I'd always thought you needed to be super rich to be an angel, but that isn't the case.
Today's tweet thread is on playing long term games in business and what that means.
Read on >>
1) Yesterday I tweeted this -- it was deliberately vague.
From the perspective of building relationships with ppl, I often see ppl in startup ecosystems playing short term games, when really they are just shooting themselves in the foot:
One of our founders called me up today & asked me what he should do about a situation. It took him a while to raise and all of a sudden today everyone wanted in.
He asked me if he could bump up the valuation cap.
Read on >>
1) He had told all the investors he was mtg w that his cap was $x.
But now he was oversubscribed and didn’t want the extra dilution. So he wanted to move it up.
2) I told him that was shortsighted. And that even if he hadn’t signed w these ppl yet, he should honor his word - that they could come in at $x - what he told them.