Today is deadline day for EU citizens to apply to stay in their homes in the UK.
An incredible self-inflicted disaster. Starting tomorrow & over the next years, tens or even hundreds of thousands more people are going to lose rights & be forced into the hands of criminals.
Those people's landlords, employers and GPs are going to become gatekeepers for what essential services they can access.
We've already seen people wrongful turned away, there will be many, many more.
IPPR has found out over 100,000 of our EU citizen neighbours are still waiting in limbo. This settled status system was never going to work.
Add to that the Home Office's track record of incompetence and cruelty and this is a disaster waiting to happen.
This didn't need to happen. It still doesn't have to.
No one should be trapped in the Hostile Environment, whether because of Brexit, or in the case of non-Europeans because of our incredibly inflexible, expensive and labyrinthine visa system. It benefits no one but criminals.
Next week Patel will bring a new Borders Bill to Parliament which will slash the rights of refugees but, despite her claims, Do absolutely nothing about the undocumented migrant population.
People become undocumented because of stupid policies like the Settled Status deadline.
There are solutions to this problem, but they would take a much braver Home Secretary willing to listen to new ideas for a new approach to our borders, and that is not Priti Patel.
In fear of the right wing press, she will forge on with her damaging agenda & outcomes be damned.
We need access to asylum at our externalised border in France, tear up juxtaposed controls & give undocumented migrants for whom the UK is home a realistic route to regularisation.
Just like Theresa May was warned the Hostile Environment was causing racist discrimination that would impact the Windrush generation, we are warning MPs now that Patel's Bill will only make things worse.
This Bill could be an opportunity to make the changes that protect people.
But we need some bravery and leadership from parliamentarians and we desperately need them to step up and support an approach that deals in evidence, not in how many approving Telegraph or Mail headlines they can get for their "toughness".
EU citizens, every one, deserve the right to carry on their lives without disruption.
Refugees deserve a functioning protection system accessible to all who need it.
We all deserve an end to this groundhog day of rehashed, hostile policies. We need to move on to better things.
The people saying that EU folks "should have applied by now" are the same as those who say asylum seekers "should" apply somewhere else.
I choose to live in the real world and take responsibility. You carry on about what you reckon people "should" do and see what it gets you.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Simply no justification whatsoever based on the idea of "safe first country" to send people to Rwanda.
Makes a complete mockery of their own flawed logic.
That was well explained by a @UNHCRUK rep on #r4today just now - UN being unusually vocal in its criticism of Patel's plans.
To be absolutely clear, though, this is not going to happen. This country won't stand for it and, frankly, nor will the likes of Rwanda. Patel and Johnson have misread the public again if they think there is widespread support for this level of abject, insensate cruelty #r4today
These are pathetic, re-hashed-from-the-90s, failed approaches of the past that our clueless Home Secretary will lay before Parliament in her new Bill come this week or next.
We must demand MPs throw them out with the contempt they deserve & introduce a real new approach #r4today
A world where the UK and Denmark are trying to palm off their responsibilities to refugees onto Rwanda... there's something wrong with this picture 🤦♀️
Reading this now I just feel like crying. But there will be no crying. Only fighting back.
And there'll be no God forsaken refugee processing hub in Rwanda for fuck's sake.
They couldn't do offshore processing when they threatened to in the 90s, nor the 00s. And just cos zoomers are wearing low rise bootcut jeans now it's no bloody excuse to try it over again.
I'm hearing on #r4today that working class white kids have poor educational outcomes because of "the concept of white privelege" & not a series of Tory govts over 11 years that have alienated teachers' unions, cut youth services to the bone & torn up the benefits system 😐😑
So. That's a relief.
Asked what data supports claim that it is "white privelege" holding poor white kids back, we hear that Robert Halford is Jewish, actually. Fascinating.
Pushed on whether this is actually relevant he complains, I kid you not, about "pitching one group against another" 🤦♀️ #r4today
Anyone who thinks that the brain drain is a thing to be solved by trapping people in places without opportunities (or, in some cases safety), but isn't going to wall off London from immigrants from Blackpool can suck my dick.
Either everybody, not just brown people, stays put in the box they were born in and make the bloody best of it regardless... or we value people more highly than we do places, in which case, genuinely, stfu.
It's possible ofc, that this government really is aiming to achieve what the governments of the 80s were not QUITE racist enough to fully implement:
A free movement area with the "old" (white) colonies.
I highly doubt it, but no doubt some will characterise it as such either way.
More likely imho is an increase in limited legal migration pathways. I've banged on about the India deal here, explaining why a few thousand time-limited visas is likely, if anything, to *increase* the number of people who end up living here without papers
The UK & Denmark still locked in a despicable race to the bottom on how to slither out of responsibility for refugee protection.
Both of these two rich countries have given themselves permission to send asylum seekers away to any other country on Earth... amp.theguardian.com/world/2021/jun…
Of course the problem for both is it's not just your own permission you need to palm off your asylum responsibilities on other countries, but those other countries' permission too.
Neither has yet managed to convince another country why on Earth they should take on our refugees?
Interesting (in a completely sickening way) that each takes a slightly different tactic for ducking reviewing the protection claims of a few thousand desperate people.
Denmark seeks to just process people's claims elsewhere, presumably allowing those recognised back in again...