John Bull Profile picture
30 Jun, 10 tweets, 2 min read
Every now and again I remember that Mass Effect has a whole lurking subplot about the importance of using "Synthetic Intelligence" rather than "Artificial Intelligence" if you accept everyone as 'alive'.

Easy to miss it, but it's there. One of the reasons I love the series.
To which it THEN throws in the concept of Virtual Intelligences, which are specifically manufactured not to be self-aware, which then opens up ANOTHER can of worms.

Specifically once you demonstrably have VIs that seem to exhibit self-awareness.
Throw in the whole issues of the galaxy's treatment of the Rachni and Krogan for "the greater good" (genocide in the first instance, biological alterations to reduce birth survival rates in the second) and ain't NO ONE in those games without historical blood on their hands.
All three Mass Effect games are, lurking beneath the covers, massive open-ended questions about who gets to define what life is. And who (if anyone ) gets to decide which lives are more important than other lives.

And, importantly, that ANY answer to the above is always wrong.
The problem is that unless you legit read the codexes and letters, and pay attention to the stories in the various side missions (rather than seeing them as just side missions) it's SUPER easy to miss all that.

Especially on first play through.
All you get is the grand sweeps in each game: which cover the same underlying ground, but in a much more personal (i.e. Shepard's direct relationship with the companions and immediate story npcs) and simultaneously EPIC CINEMA way.
Which it has to. That's how games work. But the Mass Effect series is, if anything, a secret sequel to Knights of The Old Republic.

It covers the same themes, writ large:

Who gets to decide who lives, and who dies, when truth always depends on a certain point of view.
I suspect this is why a lot of people felt robbed with the ending of Mass Effect 3. They wanted the big, sweeping climatic builds to go on forever.

What you get is:

"Those questions of life and self we tried to get you thinking about on the journey? Make your choice."
Which was a nice IDEA, and I think the more playthroughs you do of the series, the more it lands.

But it asked a LOT of players. And I suspect, with hindsight, they wish they'd make it a bit more bleedin' obvious at times along the way.
Short version:

Go watch this scene again if you played them, considering all the above, and tell me there's not layers beyond layers hidden within it.

Keelah se'lai.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with John Bull

John Bull Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @garius

1 Jul
It is quite possibly easier to get blood out of a stone than it is to get blood results out of my GP surgery.
"ring us to get your results. don't schedule an appointment."

"we don't give those out over the phone."

"how do i get them then?"

"you'll need to schedule an appointment."
No wonder they're in special measures.
Read 19 tweets
30 Jun
You can trace all of this back to his refusal to do the Andrew Neil interview in December 2019.

That was the moment he definitively knew he could get away with not conforming to the norms of politics.

And that not only would supporters not object, but they would cheer him on.
Plenty of seeds before that of course. Most critically the absolute destruction of parliamentary norms in August 2019, which I wrote about at the time with reference to A Man For All Seasons.

But December was the point he realised his voters didn't care.

garius.medium.com/and-the-devil-…
This is, ultimately, the problem with electing a sociopath.

They only follow norms when norms demonstrably matter.

And right now, for a WHOLE bunch of political and societal reasons in this country, they don't.

We'll pay for that in future, much more than it's costing us now.
Read 5 tweets
23 Jun
There's a cat snoozing somewhere in this house but I've given up trying to find him.

He'll no doubt make his presence known to me at about 3am.
NARRATOR: The head boops came at 2:30am
CAT: head boop!
ME: I was sleeping
CAT: hence the head boop
ME: Fine. I'll let you out.
CAT: Scritch me first
ME: No.
CAT: Wait... this duvet is warm
ME: You're going out
CAT: ignore head boop. Gonna snooze here for a bit first.
ME: *picks up cat*
CAT: HALP! I'M BEING OPPRESSED!
Read 16 tweets
22 Jun
Taylor Swift is our Bruce Springsteen. This becomes clearer with every album.

I will be taking no further questions at this time.
I submit this before the court as evidence your honour.

Bruce fucking knocking storytelling out the PARK.
Read 4 tweets
22 Jun
See also:

Military historians who think that unless whatever you wrote covered EVERY SINGLE ASPECT of an action, your content is invalid.

"Your Twitter thread didn't mention XYZ"

It's a thread. My goal is getting them interested enough to go learn more
Just because I didn't over-explain it doesn't mean I didn't know it and consider it.

It just means it wasn't relevant to a broader narrative which has been caveated as BEING a broader narrative.
Or, to give a more specific example, not everyone gives a shit which exact unit was where, or the precise order of battle, before understanding the totality of what happened.
Read 6 tweets
22 Jun
Academic Twitter is zombie accounts named after Research Groups that are clearly run by one male academic and only tweet five times a year.

- One is an event promo with the wrong date
- Three are RTs of the main uni account
- one is an accidental porn RT
This is not to say that there are not PLENTY of good academics on Twitter. I know and follow many.

They are not, however, "academic twitter"

Because they understand that Twitter is about engaging with people on equal terms, not expecting engagement as some kind of right.
Academic Twitter (capitalised) is the ones who refuse to Tweet anything because they're outraged they only have thirteen followers, despite the fact that they've written seven original tweets in the last four years.

One of which just said "Well I'm on Twitter now."
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(