The creator economy is becoming part of the cryptoeconomy. Because legacy social media platforms have no real concept of digital property rights.
Substack, Twitter Revue, and Facebook Bulletin are all great. But they are in a sense intermediate steps.
Ghost goes further. You can run it at a domain you control.
Decentralized social media platforms go further still. You hold the private keys.
Under communism, there was no such thing as personal property. Everything that transpired in the PRC & USSR was downstream of that economic illogic, the root cause.
The restoration of private property was one of the keys to unlocking the Chinese economy. npr.org/sections/money…
We haven't yet seen the internet used for anything near the scale of what transpired under communism.
But the century is young...and Snowden has warned us. The data for mass surveillance and hence mass repression exists. And it exists because it exists on other people's servers.
The introduction of truly private property online in the form of private keys is thus of significant economic *and* moral weight. And the scale is also 1B+ people. If we can use it to stop surveillance, in the fullness of time we may see it as comparable to Deng's reforms.
It's thus a good thing that there are short-term economic incentives driving crypto adoption.
The introduction of universal private keys, the encryption of all p2p messages, and the relocalization of user data makes money in the short term and makes freedom in the long term.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
From seeing like a state to learning like a machine.
A state can only make rectilinear decisions based on paper forms. Scalable but binary.
A machine can make curvilinear decisions based on digital data. Scalable and statistical.
Of course, some states have partially adapted & have some of their data online (albeit in often insecure databases).
But it’s just a retrofit. It’s not like the leaders are looking at metrics on the health and wealth of their constituents. Nor are they making decisions via code.
File sharing was once huge, and may become huge again.
The fundamental new primitive that blockchains offer for protocol design is tamper-resistant global shared state.
With this, someone could do a crypto Napster, KaZaa, or PirateBay. Probably pseudonymously, or in a country like Denmark with a "Pirate Party". Maybe not in music…
P2P, MVC, CBC
Blockchains allow us to combine the decentralization and programmability of the P2P era with the global state and monetizability of the MVC era.
For protocols with global state, the new architecture is then client-blockchain-client, or CBC.
Longevity has the potential to be to traditional medicine what crypto is to traditional finance. It changes the terms of the debate.
Starting with Bitcoin's rejection of central banking & endless inflation, the cryptoeconomy has challenged virtually every premise of the state-controlled, paper-based financial system that we've inherited.
So far? Plenty of risks, plenty of loss — and undeniable progress.
The conventional macroeconomic wisdom is that high inflation is bad, but that deflation is also bad, so a little inflation is good.
But there's bad deflation, often due to contraction of money supply. And then there's good deflation, due to genuine productivity increases.
1) One day charts are highly volatile and we need to see where everything averages out. Some kind of drop looks real, but capacity may come online in other places.
2) The first chart (hashrate) is over years, the second is over months - otherwise you can't see the blip.
One somewhat vexing thing:
(a) when hashrate drops a lot, you want a quick difficulty adjustment
(b) but when hashrate drops a lot, blocks take longer to mine, so difficulty adjustment takes longer to come