Notice that this is not a denial.

@DonaldJTrumpJr does not say that allegations are not true.

He says the Trump Org has been singled out. This is the "selective prosecution" defense, and there are multiple problems with it.

1/
🔹It's based on the cynical idea (and lie) that everyone cheats.

The indictment documented shocking, ongoing, shameless cheating, including juggling the books and falifying records

🔹"Everyone does it" or "someone did worse" are not legal defenses.

2/
In our Washington Post piece yesterday, @reichellaw
and I explain.

If 20 people are speeding down the highway, and you're the only one pulled over, you get a ticket. There was no law enforcement misconduct.

3/
washingtonpost.com/outlook/2021/0…
Selective prosecution is this ⤵️ The discrimination must be against a protected category.

"Rich people who cheat" is not a protected category.

Here's the kicker: Raising this defense is basically an admission of guilt. "I'm guilty but was selectively prosecuted."

4/
What happened was the opposite of selective prosecution.

Under the circumstances, NOT prosecuting would have been PREFERENTIAL treatment.

This isn't like a random car pulled over.
It's like a car speeding recklessly for years but was untouchable because of who was driving.

5/
Given what has been coming out, not investigating would have been preferential treatment.

@MichaelCohen212 testified before Congress in 2018 about a litany of crimes that he did on behalf of Trump.

The NYTimes reported massive tax cheating for years.

6/
And @SWinstonWolkoff enraged that the Trump family tried to turn her into a scapegoat for their alleged crimes — went public with shocking details about how she was set up by the Trumps as a scapegoat to take the blame for a missing $27 million from the inauguration funds.

7/
Given the family's well-known history of shady business practices, questionable real estate deals, cheating of charities, for a prosecutor to ignore the evidence would be to offer preferential treatment.

8/
I'm also hearing versions of this: "They've scrutinized everything for years but never came up with anything until now."

Really, that statement is this: "We've received preferential treatment for years, so it's totally unfair that we're not receiving it now."

9/
The article that Jr. quoted (which repeated all the Trump talking points) says⤵️

First, it isn't true. Most people don't cheat like that, and the pattern of cheating was shocking.

Most of us don't cheat in order to live a lavish lifetyle.

Second, it's not a denial.

10/
The argument is "They're guilty but so what it isn't a big deal and everyone does things like that so why are you picking on them."

They think cheating is okay, for them.

Make America Great Again means go back to the time [white] men could grab whatever they wanted.

11/
Before the New Deal and regulatory agencies, they could cheat, manipulate markets, and fix prices.

Before modern rape and sexual harassment laws, they could grab women.

On the frontier, they could grab land.

It's hard to give up all that "liberty."

12/
I think Jr. and Eric are melting down because they know they've done everything Weisselberg was accused of.

And they can't deny it because it's all documented.

"We're the company leaders, but we had no idea the company was cheating left and right" is problematic.

13/
If I had an edit button, I'd change "rich people who cheat" to "people who get rich by cheating."

The Trump history of cheating goes way back.

Of course, they're shocked by indictments.


14/
Coming back to add another thought.

Here's the main problem a hypothetical "I am being prosecuted because I am a prominent person and people don't like me" defense.

It would only be available to the wealthy, privileged, and prominent.

Wealth and fame become a shield.

15/
Actually power becomes a shield, which is the opposite of what is supposed to happen.

The other advantage available to the Trumps is that they have the ability to poison the jury pool in ways not normally available.

16/
Here you have @AriFleischer and the National Review claiming "selective prosecution."

Notice they don't deny guilt.

The argument is that prosecutors should be going after violent crime and the choice was "political."

Basically: They're guilty, but violent crime is worse.
Right. ….
"I had no idea my CFO was cheating all those years" would be so preposterous, I'm sure he won't try it. He'd be a laughing stock.

He'd rather play the victim.

The crazy part is that he still has so many defenders in the Republican Party.
My guess is they were provided by a cooperating witness. Perhaps the comptroller?

If so, it's damning evidence.

I wondered that as well, too. Remember when his home office was searched? He had Trump Org files in his home and they were seized. By the time they were returned to him, he had turned against Trump.

I just noticed that the years of the ledgers were 2012 to 2017.

2018 was when Cohen turned against Trump.

So it seems the records were most likely provided by Cohen.

🕵️

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Teri Kanefield

Teri Kanefield Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Teri_Kanefield

2 Jul
I'm skeptical about the idea that Weisselberg's testimony is necessary to establish criminal intent (for Trump and his kids).

Just look at Trump's history.

Circumstantial evidence is often used to prove criminal intent. law.cornell.edu/wex/intent
Depends on what you mean by "really hard."

Prisons are filled with people who were convicted based on circumstantial evidence.

Unless a person confesses, you need some circumstantial evidence.

Testimony also isn't 100% reliable.
Witnesses don't always tell the truth.
Juries don't always believe the witness.
Witnesses who "flip" were usually involved in the criminal scheme, so their testimony can also be suspect.

Documentary evidence is harder to discredit. Witnesses can help connect the dots.
Read 7 tweets
1 Jul
Weisselberg was "one of the largest individual beneficiaries" of the criminal scheme.

So there were others.
He wasn't even necessarily the largest beneficiary.

Today, those others are probably having a Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Day.
I should do this as a thread.

This is important: The scheme is systematic and ongoing. In other words, we're not talking about a few isolated incidents, but pervasive over a period of years.

This is my surprised face. [sarcasm]
The defendants "and others."

The scheme was to compensate Weisselberg "and other Trump organization executives. . . " off the books.

It's hard to believe those others get to skate free. There's just too much noise in here about them.
Read 14 tweets
30 Jun
Hi, @GOPLeader

Not this again. Sigh.

Right,⤵️ but today they'd be Republicans.

I think you could use a refresher on the history of the parties. I can recommend a few books, including @HC_Richardson's To Make Men Free (I'll put the covers in the next tweet.)

1/
How Lincoln’s anti-slavery, strong federal government pro-industry party morphed into the party of the Proud Boys is a little complicated, but I'll break it down.

Unless otherwise indicated, all facts taken from these books ⤵️

Ready, @GOPLeader?

2/
During the Civil War, the Democratic Party was the pro-slavery party of the Confederacy & rural America.

In other words, these guys⤵️would have been Democrats.

Spoiler: Now they're Republicans.

3/
Read 18 tweets
28 Jun
I wonder what would happen if, across the nation, people started holding signs in front of Toyota dealerships and handing out leaflets about why money spent on Toyota funds insurrections.

🤔
This would be most effective, of course, in blue or blue-leaning areas where sales could immediately drop off.

Tax cuts from the Trump party are appealing, but without sales, tax cuts do no good.

And ⤵️
What democracy needs right now are community organizers.
Read 4 tweets
27 Jun
I finished reading NYU prof. @ruthbenghiat’s book Strongmen: From Mussolini to the Present.

I’m ready with a Twitter Book report, which I combined with this week’s video.

I'll also talk about how to weaken the Trump-Fox-Republican cult.


1/
[Edited] transcription here: terikanefield.com/how-to-weaken-…

I’ll also do a Twitter summary.

The book is detailed and complete and there’s no way to do it justice in a Twitter thread, but (after I fill my ☕️) I'll try to hit a few main points.
Ben-Ghiat, a historian, tells the stories of an impressive list of strongmen👇 Patterns emerge.

🔹They all use their public office to enrich themselves.
🔹Most come to power with a history of lawbreaking.
🔹They act like gangsters.
🔹They encourage violence.
Read 26 tweets
25 Jun
As the future looks bleaker for the Republicans as a minority party, they will get crazier and more extreme.

It comes from panic and desperation.
One way to see the evolution of the Republican Party is that what was once the right wing fringe has now taken over the party, and moderates are leaving.

The analysis, though, can do deeper . . .
Another way to see this is what @dziblatt calls the conservative dilemma, which is this:

Conservatives tend to represent the wealth and powerful corporations, therefore the policies they advocate are not appealing to the majority of people.

So how do they win elections?
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(