Close election, sees conservative vote drop by enough to wipe out the spoiling action of George Galloway’s socially divisive “Workers party”.
2/
Decline in LibDem, Greens & independents vote suggests (at this stage) enough people switched to help Labour candidate over the line as Labour vote declined under the assault of a combined right wing & far left support for Galloway.
3/
Interestingly the right wing vote split between at least 5 parties helped Labour over the line.
Had UKIP, English democrat & For Britain & Jayda Fransen not stood, the Conservatives could have taken the seat.
Result:
The right wing split enough to cancel out left split.
4/
I gave up trying to call this seat.
I thought Labour would definitely lose until 7 days ago.
What I suspect is Hancock affair/resignation demotivated lots of tories from voting.
We’ll likely know if the victory was down to that, but at the very least it has to be a factor.
5/
The reason I was convinced Conservatives would win was the HWD-independents vote would have to go somewhere and I thought that combined with Galloway would see tories thru.
In the end Tories lost just enough votes to ensure Labour could fight off Galloway threat.
6/ A positive rejoiners can take from this is that the “get Brexit done” impulse in the conservative vote may be far less solid in their support for the conservatives in future.
I’ve banged on about this for months now.
A Tory strategy of relying on “redwall” is likely to fail.
The post 2016 southern drift from Tories + defusing the emotions around Brexit among leave voting labour seats in midlands/north this the key to changing govt in 2024.
Or in other words:
Starmer’s strategy.
And for avoidance of any doubt I’m not a “Starmer groupie”. My voting is purely transactional.
The problem with the Starmer “has failed brigade” is the day after Starmer leaves the Labour Party will face EXACTLY the same problems as it did under Starmer.
The only way is…
Labour need to “defuse the emotions”around Brexit in leave voting labour seats, while with the help of LibDems chipping off centre/remainer Tories in the South.
It’s the Blairite 90s strategy..but in a much less benign environment for Labour.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
UK govt “offered full compliance” on the northern Irish protocol as a quid-pro-quo to getting the EU to accept equivalence for the city of London in European financial services.
2/
What’s surprising about this is how little it’s been reported on. Perhaps journalists are worrying about calling this gambit or outcome too early…
The Telegraph did a bit on this but (as usual) put a rather unhelpful top heavy Telegraph spin on it.
Whether you think this tactic good or bad or even if you disagree with the way I’ve phrased this there can be no real doubt now that, for the UK govt, it considers the deal with EU still “up for grabs”.
In other words the Brexit negotiations “are ongoing”.
I know a few people a bit nervous about England doing well for “jingoistic/Brexit related” reasons.
Don’t be!
The England team is a wonderful group of lads led by a socially conscious manager.
& a 🏴 Championship win could help align/rejoin in lots of unexpected ways….
The connection between success in sport & jingoism is more complicated than many liberals realise.
There’s a school of thought that winning a sporting event can be quite useful to defuse feelings of unhealthy nationalism as this comes from an unhealthy inferiority complex.
3/
Next point:
What would you rather have?
Patriotic feeling channelled into Rashford Southgate & co or Brexit?
Some will of course do both, but it’s a lot more difficult to sing the praises of this England team & be rightwing as Tory MPs have found out
Understanding of UK’s position on the Irish protocol is changing in the EU.
The original view was that the UK was “playing hardball” to extract advantages & “appease domestic voter base”.
This view is now considered to have been a false reading of UK govt’s policy…
2/
Emerging EU view now is that Johnson simply doesn’t want a Northern Ireland that can extract benefits from a compromise status which gives NI advantages over restUK due to a negotiated aligned position with EU.
As this would offer a template of successful EU-UK relationship.
3/
The debate in EU has been whether UK policy was merely “tactics” playing hardball to extract your extra benefits - or a “strategy” to reach a set final objective.
Turns out neither might be true & instead a permanent awkward dysfunctional status quo may be the real aim.
EU to grant Northern Ireland an extension on chilled meat - the “sausage war” - for 3 months.
2/
This additional grace period agreed by the EU “assumes” that UK aligns with EU food standards rules during this time.
3/
This additional grace period also “assumes” (ie stipulates) that the UK works towards ways to undertake processes & actions that will fulfil the northern Irish protocol in a “sustainable way”.