Trimming or permanently selling out of winners for no good reason is a terrible idea!
The big returns are generated by holding, not by selling.
By "taking" a 20% or 30% of 40% profit, one misses out on 200% or 300% or 400% gains.
If you sell, you can no longer benefit from those stocks.
Very few companies compound like crazy, best to hold onto them for as long as possible.
IMHO, the reasons when a great stock should be sold -
- Business matures (can't grow)
- Management changes or deteriorates
- The business outlook deteriorates (competition)
- Cash is needed for a younger compounder
- Stock triples/quadruples within months
Hope this is helpful.
Finally, out of all the above reasons, selling solely because of a huge run up is *very* risky.
Stock can keep running even more and its very hard to time the pullback and know when to re-invest (not to mention tax consequences).
Therefore, best to just hold onto winners.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Discovered today that a few anonymous haters (one of whom is a convicted felon - he was imprisoned for defrauding investors out of hundreds of millions) published my "career history" a few weeks ago to smear my reputation.
Their biased summary is an attempt to rewrite history.
Some facts -
I was a Founding Director/major shareholder (one of three business partners) of my first investment management firm which was founded in 2001 (when I was 24 years old).
After discovering questionable conduct, I immediately resigned from that firm, sold...
...my shares and founded my own boutique investment management firm in 2005 which managed capital for companie, family offices and high net worth individuals.
I ran my firm until 2016, which is when I retired from the business and my company was acquired by a Hong Kong...
If a business has a super bright future, usually pays to buy shares for the long haul.
Many keep waiting for big pullbacks and miss out on life changing returns.
Few % here or there makes no difference if stock goes up 100s of % over several years.
In my 20+ year career as an investor, I've lost out on most money by NOT buying into super high-quality businesses because their valuations seemed "too high".
Those stocks ended up rallying 100s of % and well, the cheap stuff usually underperformed. Strange but true.
Fortunately, I've learnt from the school of hard knocks ---
May was a tough month for growth companies as most related stocks came under the pump before stabilising.
Fortunately, my trend following indicators got me hedged in time and my portfolio remained market-neutral during most of the month which is reflected...
After parabolic rise last year, this is the completion of a topping formation and the beginning of the Stage 4 decline (which is usually the most vicious).
My portfolio got hedged about 10 days ago and now, I'm marginally net short.
Trolls were making fun of me about a month ago for going from leveraged long to hedged.
Who is laughing now!?
Always pays to listen to the market; being stubborn is a recipe for disaster. When it comes to portfolio holdings, its okay to be wrong, not okay to stay wrong.