Data has repeatedly shown that the 2002 Serial Offender Theory contains a misrepresentative sample and an incorrect conclusion. 2015 research showed 13.2% of men self report at least one rape, and may likely repeat, but usually only during a 1-4 year period in their lifetimes.
Swartout, Koss, White, Thompson, Abbey, and Bellis (2015)
Given that close to a quarter of American women will be the victim of an attempted or completed rape, the 13.2% figure makes sense, once you account for the brief (in comparison to lifespan) time periods of repeated offending. It’s not 1:1, but it’s also not even close to 1:20.
So that’s just over a 1 in 10 chance that a man you have an 80% chance of knowing will add you to the same story shared by 1 in 5 US women.
As a general rule, when men use the word “tiny” in a sentence, it’s probably gaslighting - they seem to dislike the word when it’s true.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Tired of “wow,” “shut up,” and “lol” comprising 99% of men’s responses whenever I quote tweet another man telling me I’m worthless piece of shit when 99% of men call themselves good guys.
Tired of seeing men catcall on the street while other men look away because they’re not like that - they’re the good guys.
Tired of men “just asking questions” about whether rape stats are legit, or “just pointing out” that women are just as bad, or waxing poetic about a mangled version of due process and but don’t look at me, I’m one of the good guys.
Mayochup definitely has “chup” on the back of his men’s softball league tshirt.
Friends call him the chupster and don’t understand his unlikely partnership with Kranch, who’s really more of an academic but does what he can to fit in. In truth, although he is poor at softball and rarely receives a return high five, Kranch is glad to have a partner like chup,
Attributing value to your own beauty based on your personal value system is what we typically call vanity (though the concept is itself intended to gatekeep the assignment of value); understanding that men assign value to women based on beauty is just being a woman in patriarchy.
...and before anyone accurately points out that women often assign value and police one another based on patriarchal standards of beauty, note that, as I have said before, reading the meter is not the same as controlling the measurement.
Living in accordance with standards you do not control is part of existing in society writ large. Every person has the obligation to work toward changing unfair standards but not every person has the same opportunity to do so. When it comes to internalized misogyny and...
Virtually every woman I know has been harassed or assaulted by a man. Just because no one does anything about it and we go on with our lives doesn’t mean its rare, or that our fear is unjustified, it means some of us are “vitriolic” and some of us say nothing as a way to survive.
Good question. No true Scotsman refers to any attempt to define a generalization by excluding a counterexample. Feminism is a social and political movement for gender equity - if you advocate for ideas that are antithetical to that goal, you are, definitionally, not a feminist.
The rub, of course, is understanding why anti-trans rhetoric is antithetical to gender equity. There are lots of reasons, but perhaps most uncomplicated among them is that enforcing a gender binary is literally the foundational tool of patriarchy. Separate but equal doesn’t work.
The idea is that gender *shouldn’t be a consideration* when we define the societal value of a person, what rights they’re entitled to, and whether they are entitled to the same protections.
TERFs argue that protecting trans rights infringes on women’s rights, but —