With right-wing media in the US now targeting @HarshaWalia and deliberately twisting the "burn it all down" phrase to generate disgust and discredit struggles for systemic change, here is a thread on the long history of that 🔥 phraseology in struggles for social justice.
Historian Mark Leier's biography of Mikhail Bakunin, The Creative Passion, is so titled because Bakunin believed that "the passion for destruction is a creative passion." sfu.ca/history/public…
Bakunin did not *literally* mean the destruction of things per se; he was referring to the organized dismantling of social structures that protect injustice and oppression to radically transform society and creatively reorder it around truth, justice, and freedom.
In 1905, a new union was formed in Chicago - the Industrial Workers of the World - that similarly advocated for radical change and the abolition of the wasteful, exploitative capitalist system. The Wobblies, as they were known, were good with words, with many pamphlets and songs.
The preamble to the IWW constitution, which is as relevant today as ever, declares that the goal of all industrial workers should be building "the new society within the shell of the old." archive.iww.org/culture/offici…
The IWW was also a singing organization and its most famous song, a standard in the labour movement even today, is "Solidarity Forever," which concludes: "We can bring to birth a new world from the ashes of the old/ For the union makes us strong."
The IWW was not advocating *literally* for arson, but using the phrase metaphorically. Arson, instead, was how bosses and hired thugs tried to destroy the Wobblies (e.g. by actually fire bombing their offices) to stamp out the union which sought to "fan the flames of discontent."
More recently, this 🔥 phraseology has been used by movements for justice, including Black Lives Matter. Re: BLM, calls to "burn it down" were, again, metaphorical in response to systemic anti-Black racism and police repression in America.
Right-wing media loves to twist this phraseology for their own purposes. Here's how Fox covers calls to "burn down the system" if that system fails to take Black lives seriously: foxnews.com/media/black-li…
"Analysts" here try to take these "burn it all down" calls literally and then pin them to acts of property damage that often erupt in moments of indifference to human suffering and the state's use of force to protect the status quo. The goal is to discredit movements for change.
Of course right-wing media had little to say when Proud Boys burned and destroyed Black Lives Matter signs, because of course: teenvogue.com/story/proud-bo…
The phase "burn it all down" is also used in movement writing, again metaphorically. AK Press, which published @HarshaWalia's first book, even has a book called, "Burn it Down" featuring the likes of Sojourner Truth and Leanne Betasamosake Simpson: akpress.org/burnitdown.html
The editor, Breanne Fahs, argues that "we need manifestos in all their urgent rawness—their insistence that we have to act now, that we must face this, that the bleeding edge of rage and defiance ignites new and revolutionary possibilities is where new ideas are born."
Again, this is not the "ignition" of actual, literal fires - but drawing on the long tradition of that phraseology - burning down the structures of injustice to create better futures.
In short, @HarshaWalia's call to "burn it all down" needs to be understood in the long history of that 🔥 phraseology on the left - from Bakunin, to the Wobblies and BLM, to recent radical writings.
You may disagree with this political perspective, and Harsha has acknowledged the compounding issue of her tweet's timing with wild fires in the west etc., but understanding the history of that phraseology is key. We mean burn it all down, but not literally.
We want to build a new world from the metaphorical ashes of the old. That remains the goal - that's why the odious defenders of exploitative status quo seek to discredit those movements.
Still, if conservatives are going to take calls to metaphorically "burn it to the ground" *literally*, then I look forward to their attempts to cancel Nickelback:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sean Carleton

Sean Carleton Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SeanCarleton

11 Jan
Here's @jkenney's "John A. Macdonald Day" statement, an attempt to change the conversation and take the heat off of the UCP's disastrous handling of the pandemic. It won't work, namely because the statement reveals he can't even get basic Canadian history right. Here's a thread:
Let's dissect the statement line by line. This is important because Kenney has presented himself and the UCP as experts, not just in public health, but also in education. As many Albertans (I lived in the province for the past 4 years) are realizing, Kenney and the UCP are inept.
1. “Today, we recognize the birthday of Canada’s most important founding father, the Rt Hon. Sir John A. Macdonald." While JAM was a central figure in Confederation, there were many "Fathers of Confederation." JAM was no lone wolf.
Read 20 tweets
27 Nov 20
Canada's genocide denial is not as fringe as most people think. Here's another garbage piece published by the @nationalpost, written by non-expert Conrad Black, trying to defend Macdonald, an architect of Indigenous genocide, and grasping to put a positive spin on colonization.
As an historian, that subtle is just, wow. 1. He did not end Canada's colonial status, that really didn't happen until the Statute of Westminster in 1931, and even after that, Canada was - and continues to be - very much a "colonial" country.
2. JAM was most certainly not "benign." He went to war with the Metis and Indigenous communities to steal resources, oversaw and defended deliberate starvation policies on the prairies, started the Indian Residential School system and defended it etc etc etc.
Read 7 tweets
28 Oct 20
As per yesterday's news, Sen. Beyak's suspension ended without a vote by Senators due to the Liberals' proroguing of parliament. As a result, her website is back. She removed the letters of support but left up her original residential school denial speech: lynnbeyak.sencanada.ca
Here is a speech doubling down on her denialism: lynnbeyak.sencanada.ca/p107810/
Read 6 tweets
29 Aug 20
According to @NoBordersMedia, Montreal’s John A. Macdonald statue has just been toppled. As an historian of settler colonialism in what is currently Canada, let me share some accessible resources to help folks understand why this is a positive development.
First, it is important to remember that Indigenous peoples have been challenging the lionizing - the uncritical celebration - of Macdonald for 100+ years.
It is indisputable that Macdonald was a primary architect of Indigenous genocide in Canada. My colleague @innes_rob makes the case clearly here: theconversation.com/john-a-macdona…
Read 7 tweets
8 Jun 20
John A. Macdonald's anti-Indigenous and anti-Chinese racism is well documented. What is lesser known, however, is his connections to the history of #slavery and the #BritishEmpire. JAM was not a slave owner, but his second wife's father was. Thread.
There have been debates recently about the legacy of the British Empire. Was it good or bad? Here there can be no doubt: British imperialism was a ruthless project of thieving on a global scale. It was not "benevolent"; it was exploitative. Full stop: nybooks.com/daily/2018/01/…
Many empire apologists point to the fact that Britain abolished slavery (in 1833 - though it was a drawn out process), and they contend that abolition = absolution. That's absolute rubbish.
Read 12 tweets
3 Jun 20
This week has revealed what S. Razack calls Canada's racial "amnesia," the persistent denial of our long history of racism. As an historian, this forgetting is frustrating but not surprising. Here's a thread, using Heritage Minutes, to show how this amnesia is actually learned.
First, let me cite Razack's work. Check out the essays in this book, including the introduction by Razack and her difficult chapter on the murder of Indigenous woman Pamela George in Regina: btlbooks.com/book/race-spac…
Razack argues that Canadians hold certain core myths about themselves - they are tolerant, multicultural, peacekeepers et al. - that are invented, propagated, and learned in ways that serve to hide the real history of racism and genocide that Canada, like the US, is built on.
Read 25 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(