The funny thing about reading conservative media now is they truly feel like their way of life is under siege. They feel like its never been harder to be a white guy. But they don’t use empathy to understand that minorities have felt this and worse for America’s entire history.
I mean for virtually all of American history until very recently minorities were largely shut out of the mainstream economy. Native Americans were removed from their land. Black people were enslaved. Japanese Americans put in camps. All in the past 200 years.
There was the Chinese Exclusion Act. The failure of Reconstruction and the institution of Jim Crow. Mass deportations of Mexican Americans-US citizens-in the 1920s. Refusal to pass a federal anti lynching act. Keeping Black Americans from receiving New Deal benefits.
For much of American history minorities have lived on the political and economic fringes, fighting to survive in a nation that was actively trying to sabotage them. The more inclusive, multicultural America is very much a new phenomenon.
So when white conservatives say they are under siege, it is almost offensive given this nation’s history. Compared to whom? They wouldn’t switch places with anyone listed in the tweets above. But all those people would switch places with them in a heartbeat.
Let’s be real—white Americans collectively have by far the most political representation, disproportionately so. The same goes for wealth, 1/7 white families are millionaires. Historically whites have had significantly better health outcomes.
Even poor white Americans get very real benefits — whites and Blacks convicted of the same crime, such as marijuana possession, typically see whites get lighter sentences. Whites are less likely on a % basis to see police violence/harassment. Whites have easier class mobility
Whites are by far still the most politically powerful and wealthy ethnic group in America, by a massive margin. So why the grievances? Why is the conservative message that their way of life is under threat?
I think it is about relative power, both internally and externally. Although whites remain the most dominant ethnic group in America, their political power relative to other ethnic groups has shrunk over time. US geopolitical power has also shrunk relative to nonwhite nations
This losses are minor, but I believe for white conservatives they perceive they are large losses of relative power and that further losses are coming. They’re not wrong about that—minorities are likely to continue to accumulate political power + increase in number
A lot of conservatives conflate “patriotism” with whiteness or white identity. So when you hear “We’re losing our country” it is really about a sense of white identity or white political power shrinking or falling in relative terms.
For much of American history to be “American” meant to be a white man. That was the national image and standard. It was the standard perspective in history and culture and art. All of that is changing now and that is scary for a lot of people.
So the hysterics about CRT, the furor about Obama, the claims that the election results were fake—its all connected. It is about a dominant ethnic group that fears losing political power and control of the narrative. As minorities gain more power it will intensify.
The attempts to ban CRT will obviously fail, because you can’t ban ideas. And of course the very presence of minorities in America—like Black people—is a living testament to the reality that America was built on the exclusion and exploitation of others. We won’t let them forget.
Conservatives are not under siege in America, not even close. There is a massive conservative ecosystem which freely shares ideas and provides jobs and wealth. That has disproportionate political power relative to its absolute numbers.
Conservatives who believe they are under siege should look back at Native Americans forced from their land, Black Americans who were enslaved, Asian Americans who were put in camps, at Latino Americans wrongly deported. They were/are under siege. Its not even close.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I want to write a response to this narrative at some pt—the argument that Dems need to focus on economic issues and put social issues on the back burner is a bad one. It presumes marginalized groups like poc will still turnout for Dems if they reduce talk about race.
It also presumes that the Dem position on social issues is untenable while the GOP position is closer to the American mainstream. There’s a wide range of pub opinion polls which show Americans on avg are closer to the Dem position on cultural issues than GOP.
It also doesn’t reckon with the GOP’s disconnect on economic issues. We constantly hear calls for Dems to drop cultural concerns but few calls for GOP to move their economic positions closer to the median voter.
The reason I like watching sports drafts so much is they are essentially selling you hope. In the cynical and outrage fueled world of internet and social media I think hope is under supplied.
A cynic might say you’re delusional, how can anyone have hope in a cruel and self interested world where only the powerful make the rules and have agency? And I would reply that over the past 100 years, the world has made unbelievable strides in reducing poverty & mortality.
Generally when you look at social media it makes you think everything is going to collapse and fall apart. And sometimes things do. Entire governments fail, businesses die, people get hurt. But in the aggregate, are we better off than we were a century ago? Undeniably yes.
I’ve seen a lot of people say “Today’s conservatism doesn’t offer a compelling version of the future for young people.” I think this is a misunderstanding of conservatism as an ideology. Its primarily about status quo maintenance for people already in power.
Most tend to view power strictly in the economic sense. Ruling class as the wealthy. But there’s been more consideration of race/ethnicity, culture, politics as of late. There is an argument to be made that the ruling class in America has historically been white people writ large
When you think of white people, broadly construed, as the ruling class, with an “upstart” non ruling class making political and economic challenges to their power, the Trump movement makes a lot more sense and is much easier to understand.
Even though conservatives have amassed considerable political and economic power, they continue to lose cultural battles. My argument for answering why conservatives keep losing the culture war is rooted in the fundamental commitments the US made post Civil War and World War 2.
Both of those conflicts inexorably altered American society. Both the Confederacy and Nazi Germany were closed, authoritarian, racially hierarchical societies. After winning both wars the US resolved to become more inclusive and provide marginalized w more political rights.
Tbh I feel like the Democratic Party gets a ridiculous amount of irrational hate #onhere. The party has generally been positive for marginalized people for the past half century. But there are real political and societal constraints that they had to operate within.
The left critics of the Democratic Party—at least the ones on Twitter—typically make the claim that the party doesn’t fight hard enough for left policies. But reality is the problen isn’t *effort* the problem is the electorate, in which there is still a sizable % of conservatives
Leftists love to say a majority of Americans prefer left economic policies, & its “Dems fault” Dems don’t basically every election. This is purposefully dishonest (or ignorant) of the fact that social conservativism (anti multiculturalism) is stronger than economics for many ppl
Up at 3 am reading Google Scholar on why people are attracted to conspiracy theories.
Some broad themes, people are attracted to conspiracies when: 1. They feel powerless or hopeless 2. Feel alienated, low trust 3. Feel angry, like they are victimized 4. Their worldview has been repudiated
This made me think of another concept, which I think is more associated with history, “loss of empire.” All of those concepts—alienation, hopelessness, victimhood, hostility—can, imo, be emblematic of the emotions of loss of empire.