If healthcare is the most broken market in our economy, then hospitals are probably the most broken sub-market.
We've seen massive consolidation in the hospital sector (just look at this map).
Prices have gone way up, and post-merger we don't see evidence of quality increases.
The EO does three things to attack this problem:
1. Directs DOJ and FTC to update their merger guidelines to protect hospital patients
2. Directs HHS to support hospital price transparency rules
3. Encourages Congress to pass legislation on surprise hospital billing
All good!
Speaking of price transparency, that's one laudable thread that runs throughout the EO.
New rules on price/fee transparency across a wide variety of sectors (health insurance, internet services, airlines, etc.) will make it easier for consumers to comparison shop & save money.
Lastly, let's talk about banking.
Seems obvious that consumers should be able to download their banking data and take it with them.
Would make it easier for fintech to compete with legacy banks.
Dodd-Frank already allows this, but CFPB needs to issue rules to cement this right
Even though this pushes agencies in the right direction on competition, executive orders are constitutionally limited in what they can achieve & can be undone.
Congress should follow up with legislation on many of these items (especially non-competes & occupational licensing).
Here's a piece I wrote last year calling for more scrutiny of competition issues in healthcare and agricultural.
The Chinese Communist Party has blocked Western internet companies from accessing their domestic market for years.
Now, others are following in their footsteps.
Nigeria banned Twitter for deleting a tweet from the president.
India raided Twitter's office in New Delhi.
We can't return to the libertarian days of the early internet (nor would we want to).
But leaders need to defend and promote the values of the free and open internet, while taking targeted measures to address privacy concerns, hate speech, and foreign interference in elections.
Mandating “all-in” pricing would be a pro-consumer policy win.
Even well-meaning companies are forced to play games with adding on fees at the end of checkout because if they don’t they’ll lose market share to companies that do.