Recent "correspondence" in The Lancet pushes "official" PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE lies reported by so-called "fact checkers" within hours of Aug 2020 Beirut explosion in saying explosion happened when "a fire set off 2700 tons of ammonium nitrate" 1/ thelancet.com/journals/lance…
Almost ONE YEAR after the Aug 2020 blast & NO ONE has seriously challenged my analysis that concludes ONLY a 5+ kT Minimum Residual Radiation ("clean") nuke could have blasted the 43-m (141-ft) deep Beirut crater & left no detectable radioactive fallout 2/
Yet prestigious medical journal @TheLancet tweets non-peer reviewed "correspondence" from Hana Mansour et al claim that Beirut explosion "one of the most powerful non-nuclear explosions in history" as if it were "fact" 3/
These LIES have deep roots that go back at least as far as the Oct 1983 bombing of US Marine barracks in Beirut that up until the Aug 2020 Beirut explosion were repeatedly & FALSELY called “the largest non-nuclear explosion ever" (or since WWII) 4/
On Oct 1983 Beirut blast I went further than my thread on Aug 2020 Beirut blast, to identify WHO was responsible asserting Israeli PM Menachem Begin had "means, motive & opportunity" to authorize using 10-ton "clean" NUKE to blow up US Marine barracks 5/
Back in 1983 we only had newspapers & TV to spread "official" lies. In 2020 we also had so-called online "fact checkers" quoting self-proclaimed nuclear "experts" who within HOURS categorically denied ANY possibility that Beirut was a nuclear event 6/ drbairdonline.com/nuked/i-dont-k…
As for "so-called alternative media" #SCAM who follow me & whom I retweet often when they report on the consistent LIES of "fact checkers," despite my thread getting 3K likes & 2K retweets, they just NEVER talked about the Aug 2020 Beirut explosion! 7/
Indeed the only alt media personality that I have seen question the "official" ammonium nitrate LIES was @Partisangirl (also a chemist!) who waited until a month after the event so she could be absolutely sure but then quickly deleted her tweet. Why? 8/
As for the LIE about the Aug 2020 Beirut blast being "one of the most powerful non-nuclear explosions in history" it has been repeated ad nauseum since August 2020 which a simply Twitter search will show using keywords "Beirut" & "non-nuclear" 9/
So is the success of the "one of the most powerful non-nuclear explosions in history" LIE - used for so many years for Oct 1983 Beirut blast & now Aug 2020 Beirut blast - positive proof of the maxim commonly attributed to Lenin: "A lie told often enough becomes the truth"? 10/
Actually if "the truth" means that NOBODY dares question it, the most surprising thing abt the Aug 2020 Beirut blast LIE is that "often enough" took less than a day! All the ad nauseum repetition only seems to be preparing us for THE NEXT TIME "they" want to use THE SAME LIE! 11/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Did employee lawsuit get Los Angeles Unified School District #LAUSD to back down from (i.e., delay) imposing employee COVID-19 vaccine mandate? Why aren’t more employees suing employers over these mandates? What happens if (i.e., when) vaccines get full FDA approval?
Thread 1/
Despite a setback in Bridges v Houston Methodist, lawsuits still seem to be a viable avenue of recourse for at-will employees who don’t want to comply w/employer COVID-19 vaccine mandates but also don’t want to lose their jobs. 2/
In a recent Twitter thread I showed that although 4 states (MT, AR, UT, OR) have provided some protection for employees agst employer COVID-19 vaccine mandates, there is great resistance from both Demo & Repub state leaders to ban such employer mandates 3/
While at-will & contract employees across US sue in state & federal courts for judicial relief, states like Montana & Arkansas have led the way in banning private & public employer Covid-19 vaccine mandates as condition of employment
Thread 1/
In the first federal ruling on vaccine mandates, U.S. District Judge Lynn Hughes in Bridges v Houston Methodist ruled on June 12 that employers could mandate Covid-19 vaccination but ruling applied only to TEXAS, PRIVATE employers & AT-WILL employees 2/
On June 14, plaintiff’s attorney Jared Woodfill filed an appeal to the US Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals where Judge Hughes has second-lowest affirmance rate (72%) in his district 3/ thetexan.news/houston-nurses… reuters.com/article/legal-…
A month ago I made the case that an underground 5+ kT 3rd-generation nuke was responsible for the 2020 Beirut blast. Could an array of several such 3rd-generation nukes have been responsible for the utter destruction of the WTC on 9/11?
Thread 1/
Besides 2020 Beirut, I’ve also made the case recently that 3rd-generation Minimum Residual Radiation SADMs w/yield 10-20 kT TNT equiv were used in 1983 US Marine barracks bombing, four mega-blasts in 1990s England & 2005 Beirut blast that killed former Lebanese PM Rafiq Hariri 2/
This thread picks up from where I left off in another long thread examining where the immense energy needed to destroy the WTC on 9/11 & maintain hot spots in the ground for 99 days could have come from 3/
WHERE could the immense ENERGY needed to destroy the WTC on 9/11 AND maintain hot spots in the ground for 99 days have come from? Many observers have judged NO WAY could gravity & ANY chemical source (e.g., nanothermite) have provided sufficient ENERGY. So WHERE?
Thread 1/
On day of 9/11, #MSM - as if reading from some "official" script - propagandized the idea that it was practically INEVITABLE that fuel-filled jetliners flying into the Twin Towers combined w/force of gravity would cause the utter destruction of the WTC 2/
Despite the shock & awe of 9/11, some doubters like Peter Meyer, started questioning the "official" story of the inevitable "collapse" of the Twin Towers almost immediately, suggesting it had to be some form of "controlled demolition." 3/ serendipity.li/wtc_0913.html
1983 bombing of US Marine barracks in Beirut called repeatedly “the largest non-nuclear explosion ever" (or since WWII). This propaganda served many purposes, incl possibly providing cover for what was actually an Israeli “clean” micro-nuke that Joe Vialls ID'ed in 2002
Thread 1/
Although hardly "the largest non-nuclear explosion since WWII" or otherwise, the 1983 Beirut blast that killed 241 US military personnel was certainly the most powerful "terrorist" explosive device as of that date, based on the force of the explosion alone. 2/
The pile of rubble stretched as far as 70 meters from where the 4-story Battalion Landing Team (BLT) bldg had been & rose to height of at least 15 ft. At the pile's center was a massive crater initially reported as 30-40 ft wide & 20-40 ft deep in what was the BLT lobby floor. 3/
If Aussie reporter Joe Vialls was right that a “clean” underground MICRO-NUKE caused 2005 Beirut explosion, was he was also right that MICRO-NUKES blasted Central London TWICE - Baltic Exchange 1992 & Bishopsgate 1993? What about 1996 Docklands & 1996 Manchester blasts?
Thread 1/
I discuss evidence that Vialls - writing just days after 2005 blast that killed fmr PM Rafik Hariri & destroyed much of downtown Beirut - was on right track in asserting an underground "clean" micro-nuke was cause of the explosion in this long thread 2/
Back in 1993 Vialls thought it strange THREE quite similar "mega-blasts" - 1992 Baltic Exchange & 1993 Bishopsgate & 1993 WTC - should happen in just over a year: all detonated in high-profile business districts, no scorch marks & Richter-scale shocks 3/ web.archive.org/web/2005070900…