The Senate is back — yay! — and our headline of @PunchbowlNews AM is: "☀️How will this all end?”
This, meaning @JoeBiden’s agenda. We detailed a few likely scenarios.
So, here we go:
@PunchbowlNews@JoeBiden → The straightforward: @SenSchumer says he wants to set up floor votes on the bipartisan infrastructure bill and a budget resolution w reconciliation instructions before Sen recesses. Schumer has already warned that he’ll keep them in session past scheduled Aug. 6 recess date
@PunchbowlNews@JoeBiden@SenSchumer A lot would need to happen to make Schumer’s timeline reality. bipartisan bill needs to be put into leg text quickly & it needs to be scored by CBO. The bipartisan group of senators needs to find 10 Rs while holding all 50 Senate Democrats.
House&Senate would also have to agree on a budget framework as well. On top of all that, there would have to be a nearly flawless floor performance for both those measures to get through the Senate during the next few wks. budget resolution will take a week to pass on the floor
The House -- w no votes currently scheduled from July 30 to Sept. 20 -- would then probably revise its schedule. @SpeakerPelosi and her leadership team could take up those pieces of legislation in Aug and try to pass them quickly, either individually or as a one-two punch.
@SpeakerPelosi Or House Ds could extend the session deeper into the month. Or they can come back in September and take the bills up.
@SpeakerPelosi That would leave Sept for the debt limit and govt funding. The debt limit can’t ride in a reconciliation package unless Congress wants to lift the cap by a certain dollar figure. So we’re not sure how they handle that in this construct.
@SpeakerPelosi The House will try to pass some FY 2022 appropriations bills before it leaves in August, at least if @LeaderHoyer and @rosadelauro have anything to say about it.
@SpeakerPelosi And then Congress would have to consider the meat in the American Jobs Plan and American Families Plan.
@SpeakerPelosi → Another scenario: Congress struggles with the budget resolution and/or bipartisan infrastructure package and wastes the rest of July flailing around.
@SpeakerPelosi After fruitlessly staying in town for part of Aug, Congress recesses for a couple weeks. That brings us to Sept., during which lawmakers have to find a way to fund the government and lift the debt limit.
@SpeakerPelosi Congress gets some sort of hard infrastructure bill through, passes a short-term funding bill to avoid a shutdown and also suspends the debt ceiling until December -- there’s no time or political will for anything else.
@SpeakerPelosi This would create a cliff at the end of the year to help create urgency to pass a so-called “human infrastructure” bill under reconciliation before 2022 starts.
@SpeakerPelosi → Or how about this scenario: The bipartisan Senate infrastructure deal falls apart. The pay fors don’t score well enough, there’s not enough GOP support to get to the 60-vote threshold.
@SpeakerPelosi This causes huge trouble w the budget resolution, as D moderates in the House and Senate balk at tax increases or deficit spending. These Ds are more worried about staying alive politically in 22 than they are about Biden’s legislative dreams. The issue drags on for a while.
@SpeakerPelosi Democrats eventually pass a scaled-back infrastructure package with a mix of “hard” and “human” programs on a party line vote. The cost is somewhere in the $1 trillion to $2 trillion range.
@SpeakerPelosi Democrats end up passing a continuing resolution to keep the government running into early ‘22 too, but they have a hard time putting together an omnibus spending package until after the new year.
@SpeakerPelosi At some point, a suspension of the debt ceiling until 2023 is enacted. Some Republicans vote for the spending bills but nothing else.
@SpeakerPelosi → Eek, what about this: Ds struggle to pass a stopgap funding bill and have a tough time w raising the debt limit because they can't pass an infrastructure bill or budget.
@SpeakerPelosi Remember: a stopgap bill would almost certainly be based on Trump-era spending levels & that will not be palatable to a lot of Ds. And the debt limit? Democrats will need to carry that one on their own. So if Dems struggle on the big stuff, the small stuff becomes harder.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The United States Capitol Police department is running out of money.
5 sources told us, in the worst case scenario, the department could end up furloughing dozens -- if not 100s -- of employees
@PunchbowlNews Mid-August is “crunch time” for USCP. funding issue critical then.
The account used to pay USCP officers' salaries is running dangerously low and is in dire need of replenishment by Congress.
@PunchbowlNews Officers have racked up a massive amount of overtime since the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.
House passed a $1.9b security funding bill in May that included more $ for Cap Police. That legislation has been stalled in the Senate. incl more than 31m for overtime costs
In @PunchbowlNews AM this morning, we took a deeply reported look at who @GOPLeader may appoint to the Jan. 6 committee. He is going to make appointments — unless something unexpected happens.
@PunchbowlNews@GOPLeader >@Jim_Jordan: he and KM once loathed each other, but Trump brought them together. Jordan has been through Benghazi select committee and impeachment and is generally seen as a “captain” of any Republican team. Jordan has brawled w Schiff/Raskin and he understands how they operate
@PunchbowlNews@GOPLeader@Jim_Jordan → @RepMikeJohnson is a lawyer -- which McCarthy could use. He has the added benefit of having been through impeachment; Johnson served as one of the former president’s top defenders during Trump’s first Senate trial.
@PunchbowlNews@RepRonKind@SenatorBaldwin — Steve Ricchetti will be on the Hill today with Louisa Terrell and Shuwanza Goff talking to lots of lawmakers on the House side.
— We caught up with @AOC who seems quite cool with how the process is going so far. She said she feels “good,” although noted that’s not a great adjective.
She seems open to the bipartisan bill if the Senate passes a budget
We are at beginning of a very long and complicated process when it comes to Biden’s agenda — both on the hard infrastructure & human infrastructure side
why? bc progressives are going to be asked to vote for the buget with a promise of a bill later on. that’s tough. especially when so few Rs in the House are going to vote for the hard infra/none will vote for human inf
In @PunchbowlNews this AM: ☀️Inside the W.H.’s infrastructure strategy
This is a massive week for President Joe Biden’s quest to cut a bipartisan infrastructure deal. And we expect the president to lean in and try to move the process along.
@PunchbowlNews Here’s news we have after relentlessly bugging people on Father’s Day (sorry!):
→ 1st: Tthe WH truly seems to believe a deal with the bipartisan group of 20 senators is doable and perhaps even likely. We can’t tell how much of this is sunny optimism and how much is reality
@PunchbowlNews → The White House’s main focus this week is to try to figure out the right mix of offsets so the bipartisan group of senators will back off its insistence on hiking the gas tax and instituting a tax on miles driven by electric vehicles.
Why Biden shouldn’t take the deal, as we laid out in @PunchbowlNews this AM:
→ 1 tough vote. If Congress jams everything from Biden’s American Jobs and Families plans into one massive, multi-trillion dollar reconciliation package, then lawmakers only have to take one vote.
@PunchbowlNews → Don’t be cute. In order to pass a bipartisan infrastructure bill, Biden will have to corral Ds to simultaneously support a separate reconciliation package filled with more controversial spending provisions for social programs. Don’t you realize how hard that’s going to be?
@PunchbowlNews → Progressives see a trap -- and they might be right. Say this roughly $1 trillion package passes with Sinema and @Sen_JoeManchin backing it -- or even leading the way, as Sinema is doing. Will they vote for a package that includes big social program spending? Or tax increases?