Sentiment. It finds its way into a lower ERP, as it did at the secular peak in 2000, but we can also measure it through investor behavior. (THREAD)
We know about speculation in meme stocks & non-profitable tech this cycle. Margin debt has growth dramatically on a year-over-year basis, although as a percentage of market cap, margin debt remains well below the peak in the 2000s. /2
With retail speculation presumably limited to a relatively small subset of the market, looking at long-term flows--that is, regular investors saving for retirement--we see very little evidence of exuberance. /3
Since the financial crisis, just $291 billion has flowed into US equities through mutual funds & ETFs. That’s less than 1% of the $38 trillion US market cap. In contrast, $3.2 trillion has flowed into bonds. There may be a bubble in bonds, but I don’t see one in stocks. /4
While there have been pockets of exuberance and speculation in the markets, as a 36-year veteran of market cycles, I just don’t see the bell-ringing signs that the market as a whole has reached a sentiment extreme. /END
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Following up on the previous thread, as we seek to answer the question: “Is the market a bubble that is ready to burst?” The next factor to look at is the equity risk premium. (THREAD)
The discount rate (or cost of capital) consists of the risk-free rate (10 year Treasury yield) plus the equity risk premium. The ERP is like a credit spread, reflecting the additional return investors demand as compensation for additional volatility vs. the risk-free asset. /2
The surge in “excess money” (money supply growth less GDP growth) resulting from the fiscal/monetary response to the pandemic has clearly elevated the market’s valuation, as the chart below shows. /3
With stocks trading at near-record valuations and the Fed hoping to retreat from the zero lower bound (ZLB) and its $120 billion in monthly asset purchases, everyone wants to know: Is this market a bubble that is about to burst? Let's take a hard look. (THREAD)
I’m going to try the process of looking at all the market’s moving parts through the lens of the discounted cash flow model (DCF). It’s a good exercise in discipline in that it forces me to actually quantify the puzzle pieces.
For the DCF there are four important variables that we need to consider: earnings growth, the payout ratio (dividends + buybacks as a percent of earnings), interest rates, and the equity risk premium. /2
With all the speculation about the Fed raising interest rates sooner than later, let's take a look at how past "liftoff" attempts by the Fed affected the markets, and how the Fed then responded. (THREAD)
There have been four major liftoff attempts since the Global Financial Crisis. The first was in April 2010, after an 80% run in the S&P 500. The Fed ended QE1, producing a three month, 16% drawdown for stocks, which forced the Fed to start QE2 a few months later. /2
The second attempted liftoff gave us the infamous taper tantrum in May 2013 (8% drawdown). The third was the actual liftoff in 2018, which ultimately produced a brief but scary 20% decline for stocks. And now we are in the early stages of the fourth liftoff attempt. /3
My “failed 5th” call last week was premature, but today’s undercut & subsequent reversal still fits with my 5th-wave thesis outlined earlier. Now too we have some interesting divergences, which only increases my conviction that bitcoin is bottoming. (THREAD)
Here is the 14-day slow stochastic: bearish divergence at the high and bullish divergence now. /2
The GS Bitcoin-sensitive equities basket remains in an up-trend (higher highs, higher lows), and in the process also appears to be flashing a bullish divergence against btc’s new low. /3
With all the talk about bitcoin’s death cross (50d MA < 200d MA), here is the back-test: Since 2011 there have been 7 occurrences, and 71% of the time btc was higher 12 months later. There were some huge drawdowns but often times the signal came too late to be of use. (THREAD)
Many technical indicators can be a coin toss without proper context. The same applies to stocks: since 1928 the SPX has had 48 death crosses, but 3 months later it was up 58% of the time by an average of 5.2%. Context is everything. /2
Death crosses can keep us out of the worst bear markets, but they can also give many false warnings (i.e. smaller corrections that are mostly over by the time the signal hits). /3
). A classic 5th (where 5=1) would target 23,076. But sometimes 5th waves can fall short & reach only 0.618x1 (29,872). THREAD/1
Sometimes there can even be a “failed 5th” (retest of the wave 3 low at 30,017). Yes EWT is as much art as science. With all the attention out there on the triangle breakdown, it wouldn’t surprise me if we end up with a shorter 5th. /2
If so, it’ll be important that the retest gets rejected with a powerful reversal. That could trigger a bullish momentum divergence (the opposite of what we saw at the high). But if BTC makes a new low and stays there, that would be a bearish sign. /3