Today in MSFS I'm checking out a rather odd bird called the EA-7 Edgley Optica, and I'm doing it at the location where it was developed, Old Sarum Airfield near Salisbury in southwest England.
The Optica is the brainchild of British designer John Edgley, who envisioned it in the 1970s as a slow-flying alternative for many tasks now performed by helicopters.
The cockpit, which stretches forward of the powerplant and wings, gives the occupants clear 270-degree visibility much like a helicopter.
Behind the cockpit is a 6-cylinder 260hp engine - similar but larger than the 4-cylinder 180hp kind found in a Cessna 172 - that turns a large but relatively quiet fan.
Everything about this aircraft is a bit unusual, including its tail and dual rudders.
People who've seen an Edgley Optica often compare it to a bug or a dragonfly.
Inside, the cockpit layout really looks like that of a helicopter - though the instruments and controls are, in fact, those of a conventional airplane.
The fan isn't adjustable, so there's no blue lever, just a throttle and a mixture control, along with the trim, flaps, and fuel cutoffs. Since these are all on the right, if you're sitting in the main pilot's seat, you hold the stick with your left hand.
Here's the view of the fan behind us, with the first aid kit just in case.
Front and overhead is a magnetic compass, a clock, a weight-and-balance warning system, and a fire extinguisher.
I've taxied out the grass runway at Old Sarum and am ready to take off.
Both the takeoff and landing speed is just shy of 60 knots. Just as I take off, the hilltop ruins of Old Sarum itself come into view, straight ahead.
Old Sarum was an Iron Age hill fort, which later became a town and castle in the Middle Ages. @BradleySeanF and I rummaged around here one time, when I was living in London.
Here's what Old Sarum looked like in its heyday. It even had its own cathedral and bishop.
From higher up you can clearly see the outline of the settlement, including the foundations of the cathedral and castle. You can also see the grass airfield to the east (right).
In the early 1200s, the confined space and lack of water caused the bishop to relocate the cathedral to the plain a short distance south - which became the town of Salisbury.
The spire of Salisbury Cathedral is 404 feet tall, making it the tallest church in the United Kingdom. It is also home to the best preserved of the four copies of the Magna Carta.
Old Sarum, just to its north, withered into ruins - but, notoriously, its handful of residents retained a seat in Parliament, making it a prime example of what was called a "rotten borough".
Until the reapportionment of seats by population in the 19th Century, seats like Old Sarum could be easily controlled by corruption, while up and coming cities like Manchester had barely any representation in Parliament.
Looking out on Old Sarum, to the right, it does feel like you're in a helicopter, not a plane.
The Edgley Optica first flew in 1979, and at first things looked promising, with British law enforcement interested in using it for surveillance and traffic. The plane can loiter around 70 knots for up to 8 hours, and is relatively quiet, making it ideal for such roles.
But in 1985, a local police department had a crash, killing the pilot and a photographer. Although the accident was attributed to pilot error (too steep a bank, causing it to stall), the project itself came to a stall.
Only 22 Opticas were built, and 10 of them were destroyed in a fire. The company went bankrupt, and went through a string of new investors who tried to restart the project.
We're north of Salibury now, along the River Avon, approaching Amesbury and keeping our eyes out for an even more famous ancient monument. (Yes, I know I left all my lights off on takeoff and I'm sorry about that).
There it is: Stonehenge. @BradleySeanF and I once tried to walk from Old Sarum to Stonehenge and it was longer than we thought. We ended up flagging down a bus on a country road, but we made it.
Now these steep turns over Stonehenge offer an awesome view, but I can see how the Optica crashed during such a turn.
The loiter speed in 70 knots, and the stall speed with flaps up is 58. That doesn't leave much room for error. You pitch up or throttle down just a bit too much, and that stall warning starts going off. You can adjust, but not if you're distracted by sightseeing.
From what I could tell, the Optica performed best when it was slow, straight, and level. You have to take your time with gentle turns. That makes it great from some helicopter roles (surveillance, seaching) but tricky for others (photography, sightseeing).
And when I came in for a landing, at the nearby RAF base at Boscombe Down, it felt more like hovering in on a helicopter than the straight and steady approach of an airplane. It didn't help that I had a crosswind.
Apparently a new set of investors have bought the rights to the Optica, brought back John Edgley, and have been trying to relaunch the aircraft in the past few years.
Perhaps they're clever to get it onto MSFS, where a broader audience can give it a whirl and see what this dragonfly-looking aircraft is all about.
Regarding inflation, it's good to define transitory vs. persistent. Transitory would be the next several months, to the end of the year. Persistent would be the next decade.
When trying to understand the economy, we tend to refer back to historical experiences as our model. In the case of inflation, for most of us, the go-to reference is the experience of the 1970s.
But there are other historical models that may capture the situation better. I'd argue it's possible that our current experience of inflation bears less resemblance to the inflation of the 1970s than the surge in inflation immediately after World War II.
I'm not sure the size of the y/y figure tells you whether it's transitory or not. A high number could easily be as reflective of a temporary spike, due to bottlenecks, as it would a more lasting problem.
A lot of the price pressure being reported by companies in the ISM surveys do seem to reflect bottlenecks, as opposed to more persistent constraints. Of course, it's possible that one can turn into the other, if unresolved.
The fundamental problem here is that the entire supply side of the economy - from labor markets to foreign supply chains - has been thrown into utter chaos over the past year, even as stimulus spending has helped demand recover quite buoyantly.
I've noticed that the consistency/reliability of timely COVID-19 data in the US has deteriorated over the past few weeks, due to patchy reporting by various states. This is making it harder to tell a story about what is happening. Even the CDC data gets constantly revised.
According to Worldometer, the US reported +129 coronavirus yesterday, bringing the total to 623,029. But several states, including Florida, are still missing. The 7-day moving average rose slightly to 216 deaths per day. CDC still isn't posting a number for yesterday.
The US reported +14,715 new confirmed cases of COVID-19 yesterday. The data is more complete than deaths, but Florida, Michigan, and a few others still missing. Still, the 7-day moving average rose to above 20,000 new cases per day, for the first time since late May.
There is a point where the critique of objectivity becomes an embrace of subjectivity. And at that point, whether people realize it or not, all is lost.
This is why CRT and MAGA and all thinking rooted (consciously or not) in post-modernism are just different faces of the same counterfeit coin.
In other words, there is no “my truth”. There is only “my perspective on the truth” which is always subject to critical examination.
1. One of my takeaways from visiting Cuba several years ago was that Castro was very clever to make it difficult but not impossible to leave the island.
2. As a result, the people who were most ambitious and dissatisfied - and mostly likely to cause him trouble if they stayed - were willing to take the risk and flee to Florida.
3. Those - even within the same family - who were more risk adverse (and therefore likely more compliant) remained, often supported by remittances from more ambitious family members who left.