Often people get to the right conclusion but can't imagine the actual cause.
Lack of respect for property goes back further than welfare - it goes back to a tropical evolutionary environment where there is no durable property.
If it wasn't clear - "the criminals" in the first tweet were the men who coordinated around the idea that stopping "the backlash" was the most important thing.
IOW, the men leading the machine that enforced the tyranny part of anarcho-tyranny.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"If someone was elected on a platform of 'I will take command of the executive branch entirely and rule' and the candidate who ran on that won, USG would give up and collapse due to preference falsifications and guilty knowledge of having ruled badly"
One of the co-hosts (the one who speaks less) points out - "no, they would not lose hope and give" - *and he's right* - and the matter is dropped.
The things you think are being done badly aren't flaws, they're features to the ruling class.
Everyone is focused on the spectators in this (and what a joke commies who brought starvation in the name of eliminating capitalist exploitation are) but the logical endpoint of this view is that no one is watching the game anyway because it elevates the athletically talented
Finding baseball talent and arranging games and leagues that people are intensely interested is just gibs from the gibs tree and will always be there.
In reality it's more and more of a taboo to even imagine finding talent ... if the means of finding it has ... Disparate Impact
The meme only exists in a (literal) boomer context that is long gone.
Stadiums used to be in cities where gangs of white kids would live who would all be interested in baseball as entertainment and try to catch a glimpse of the games.
The other side of the "reason" for it are the bureaucrats who approve the funding / steer the grants - they have equally insane reasons. Those people do it because they want to control flows of funds and no one will question funding that goes towards "pandemic prevention".
It doesn't need to actually prevent pandemics, merely be plausibly connected to implant fear in anyone approving the funding - "what if I cut this off and there is a pandemic?"
One formula piece the press always produces is "budget cut causes disaster".
The reality of course is that this tweet isn't sincere - it's one part bait for her idiot simps "oh, I would treate you with the respect you deserve m'lady" and one part woman bragging - "high powered, successful, together men lose it around my raw sexual power"
There's a third level to this tweet of hers.
Women *really* like werewolf men - tend to fall uncontrollably in love with them and no woman want to be abandoned over and over again by men she's fallen for.
That's got to leave a massive gaping wound on her soul.
The system compulsively cultivates "expert opinion" in every area - co-opting the consensus to ensure that it is always pro-expansion of regime power in one way or another and the only valid opinion in an area.
See the recent N Wade piece about the lab leak hypothesis
What was the system doing? In one sense box ticking - the system needs to be thought of as serious so it funds some research that it can plausibly describe as being done to "prevent pandemics"