Share if you agree that now would be a good time for the Society of Editors to finally sort out their position on UK media racism... theguardian.com/media/2021/mar…
Meanwhile, the UK newspaper industry's Editors Code guidelines *still* have a whole section spelling out that comparing migrants to "cockroaches" is acceptable under their rules: editorscode.org.uk/downloads/code…
The industry-run complaints handler IPSO even tried to argue that likening migrants to cockroaches was not discriminatory - despite this being called out as "hate speech" by the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights inews.co.uk/news/uk/katie-…
The UK newspaper industry has specifically gone out of its way to ensure that articles which are "discriminatory against gay people in general, autistic people in general or transgender people in general" are permitted under its rules: ipso.co.uk/news-press-rel…
IPSO has even tried to claim that discriminatory statements attacking an entire group are less harmful than statements targeting an individual because "the effect... is diluted" ipso.co.uk/news-press-rel…
In 2016, Paul Dacre's Daily Mail was called out by the United Nations for its "unique" hostility towards migrants:
Within days of launching, GB News commentators were attacking the England football team for taking the knee, and making dangerous claims about COVID19 edition.cnn.com/2021/06/12/med…#DontFundGBNews
But most big brands want to appeal to people from a wide range of backgrounds, not just an "anti woke" niche. For many advertisers, being aligned with such inflammatory and toxic content risks alienating customers and damaging their brand. theguardian.com/media/2021/jun…
The more big brands speak out, the more of an impact this will have - full list of signatories here. If you work in advertising or marketing you can help by encouraging your clients to join: ==> medium.com/the-conscious-…
If your company buys programmatic advertising from Sky Media, it may be worth checking with them about the risk of your brand ending up on GB News campaignlive.co.uk/article/gb-new…
If to be ‘woke’ is to be anti-racist, then by branding themselves an ‘anti-woke’ TV channel, GB News seem to be making their intentions quite clear... #DontFundGBNewstheguardian.com/media/2021/jun…
"Suddenly, the word woke went from protecting marginalized folk to attacking them for standing up for their rights" antiracismdaily.com/archives/learn…
Our friends @slpng_giants_fr are facing legal threats from two notoriously toxic news outlets following the massive success of their campaign to defund hateful media in France.
But you can't sue an idea - and the campaign to make hate unprofitable is now a global movement... /1
CNews & Valeurs Actuelles may not like it, but the companies we shop with care what their customers think. And the public has every right to speak out & urge brands to stop advertising with these toxic channels... /2 huffingtonpost.co.uk/richard-wilson…
While attacking our friends @slpng_giants_fr, Valeurs Actuelles also make quite an admission: "The outrageous methods used by the Sleeping Giants have met with great success"...
They're lashing out because these campaign tactics work 👏👏👏/3
If you've wondered why the UK news industry has such a problem with institutional racism, it's worth remembering that the industry's Editors Code guidelines have a whole section spelling out that comparing African migrants to "cockroaches" is acceptable: editorscode.org.uk/downloads/code…
The UK news industry has specifically gone out of its way to ensure that articles which are "discriminatory against gay people in general, autistic people in general or transgender people in general" are permitted under its "Editors' Code": ipso.co.uk/news-press-rel…
In its decision to permit the publication of articles that are discriminatory towards entire groups of people, the UK news industry has put itself directly at odds with international standards for ethical journalism. For example the IFJ charter: ifj.org/who/rules-and-…