Upset that the government is telling social media what to censor?
There's an action for that:
There's an action for that:
https://twitter.com/roncoleman/status/1415461491919265794
"As recently as 2019, the Supreme Court reasoned 'a private entity can qualify as a state actor,' subject to First Amendment protections, under three circumstances. See Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck (2019). >
2019).
* "'When the private entity performs a traditional, exclusive public function,' see Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co. (1974);
*"'When the government compels the private entity to take a particular action,' see Blum v. Yaretsky, (1982); or >
* "'When the private entity performs a traditional, exclusive public function,' see Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co. (1974);
*"'When the government compels the private entity to take a particular action,' see Blum v. Yaretsky, (1982); or >
*"'When the government acts jointly with the private entity." See Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co. (1982)."
This is what the wise guys commenting on this thread - unsurprisingly - seem to not know when they say, "Muh private company" <>
This is what the wise guys commenting on this thread - unsurprisingly - seem to not know when they say, "Muh private company" <>
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
