Should basic human needs be catered to as services within the framework of a market order, where forces of demand and supply shall determine the price for each interaction aka transaction and the social value created for the consumer via production, exchange and consumption?
For e.g. should the receiver of services in lieu of tax money and welfare benefits earmarked by a government in areas such as health and education be treated as consumers in any other industry?
Should we have the option to choose the most efficient hospitals, and schools?
Should we have the option to choose the most efficient hospitals, and schools?
Each public service providing institution should be corporatized?
Each public service institution should have a Profit and Loss A/c and a balance sheet?
Each public service institution should treat recipients as buyers of products and their interactions akin to transactions?
Each public service institution should have a Profit and Loss A/c and a balance sheet?
Each public service institution should treat recipients as buyers of products and their interactions akin to transactions?
Social Choice Theory, full costing, and Consumer Psychology have different effects on different public service institutions.
To make public service providers more efficient, there should be more competition.
That requires a market structure and independent pricing/ costing.
To make public service providers more efficient, there should be more competition.
That requires a market structure and independent pricing/ costing.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
