Media is trying to manufacture controversy by insisting the Democrats have abandoned voting rights in favor of infrastructure. Nope. They just have the votes for infrastructure now, so they're doing it now. They're still amassing votes for voting rights, so they'll do that later.
The media is getting worse about pushing the notion that if something in politics doesn't happen immediately, it'll never happen. It's as if the entire political universe is something that began yesterday and ends tomorrow. Anything to ratchet up the tension and keep you tuned in
The media has also managed to assign such magical omnipotent powers to Joe Manchin, all they have to do is mention his name and liberal activists will conclude that any given battle is "doomed." This kind of ratings-driven reductive nonsense does real harm to political outcomes.
Even when something is on track to succeed, if the media convinces enough activists that it's doomed, they'll stop fighting for it, and it'll become doomed. Then the media will use this failure as "proof" that it was right all along for predicting that the effort would fail.
What's particularly galling is the media is taking something as fundamentally ground shifting as this infrastructure package, and spinning it as a negative. "They're doing infrastructure before voting rights so we're all DOOMED!" That's nuts when you step back and think about it.
But the media (on the left, right and center) knows that "Democrats are blowing it" is their single best ratings-driven narrative. Conservatives love being told their side is winning. Liberals are transfixed by anyone who tells them they're going to lose. So it's ratings gold.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Palmer Report

Palmer Report Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PalmerReport

16 Jul
Dear @molly0xFFF – you've publicly identified yourself as one of the editors who hijacked Palmer Report's Wikipedia page. You've also inserted yourself into our Twitter replies. Accordingly, perhaps you'd like to answer some questions about the con game you've been playing:
1) Why have you allowed a rogue editor named "Dr. Swag Lord PhD" to continue editing Palmer Report's Wikipedia page, after he was caught removing all positive/neutral sourcing from the page, and after he used threats to chase another established editor off the Talk page?
2) Why have you failed to reinstate the positive/neutral references that USA Today, Washington Post, the Palm Beach Post, and other major newspapers have made to Palmer Report? How do you justify your policy of only allowing negative sourcing about Palmer Report?
Read 41 tweets
15 Jul
ALL HANDS ON DECK: if you have any ability to edit Wikipedia, please delete all of the conspiratorial, biased, fictional nonsense that a small band of rogue editors has placed on Palmer Report's page. Keep deleting it until these trolls give up. Thanks!
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palmer_Re…
We've already gotten one of these rogue editors banned for their gross abuse of Wikipedia. We won't stop until they've all been banned. Just keep removing the dishonest garbage from the page. If they add it back, remove it again. THIS IS WAR, and Palmer Report needs your help.
Looks like these sick fucks have locked the page again. So be it. We won't stop until they've been permanently banned from Wikipedia. And we're looking at all possible legal action, again them and Wikipedia at large. These sick fucks will regret this.
Read 4 tweets
14 Jul
Palmer Report's recently defaced Wikipedia page has finally been unlocked. If you have some experience editing Wikipedia and you want to take a crack at starting to remove the baseless defamatory nonsense that's been added to the page, go for it: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palmer_Re…
While Wikipedia has removed one of the rogue editors who defaced the page, the other rogue editors are still active on the page – so you will have to deal with them. You can ally yourselves with other, sane editors on the "Talk" page: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Palm…
Keep in mind that this is a war of attrition. You have to wear the rogue editors down, not by insulting them, but by factually countering every bit of bullshit they're spewing on the "Talk" page. Once they realize it's no longer their personal playground, they may move on.
Read 4 tweets
11 Jul
Right wingers don’t understand right or wrong, true or false. They only understand winning or losing, strong or weak. Want to break their spirit? Drive home to them that Trump and the GOP are weak inept losers, and that until they give up Trump and the GOP, they’re also losers.
Many rural Americans think the rest of the country looks down on them. And they’re right – but they’re wrong about why. They think it’s because they’re rural, poor, didn’t go to college. Not at all. Americans only look down on them because of their vile right wing agenda.
Mainstream Americans correctly look down on right wingers for their racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, uncaring, often violent stances. People who express these views are in fact garbage. They cease being garbage if and when they disavow these views.
Read 7 tweets
11 Jul
We’re making a mistake constantly yelling around about “authoritarianism.”

Voters in the middle don’t know what that means, don’t believe it, and don’t care.

They hate incompetence, extremism, and embarrassments.

High minded words like “authoritarianism” just bounce off them.
Even if you try to explain to voters in the middle what “authoritarianism” is, you won’t get anywhere. They won’t buy it. It’s like when conservatives thought they could win in 2012 by painting Obama as a “dictator.” Voters in the middle just laugh at “other side is evil” claims.
Besides, once you get bogged down in having to define terms, you’ve already lost the argument. Liberals make this mistake over and over again, fighting dictionary battles that don’t actually sway anyone.
Read 8 tweets
5 Jul
1) Many of you have asked why so many loons (most of them on the LEFT, not the right) have come out of the woodwork the past few weeks to stalk me and spread conspiracy theories about me. Well, it began when news broke that a grand jury was empaneled to bring Trump indictments.
2) For years, numerous liberal pundits big and small have built their brand around insisting Trump would get away with it all (it scares you into paying attention to them). Many of these pundits spent years loudly mocking me for daring to say that Trump would end up indicted.
3) In fact a whole lot of liberal pundits – ranging from the pundits at major news sites, to the obscure wannabe pundits who just the troll bigger liberal pundits for a living – spent years building their brand by telling their liberal audiences that Palmer Report was fake news.
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(