We need more “reading and reflecting and sharing smart thoughts” time and less seminars where people present papers/give talks.
I want the Reading Group/Book Club/Learning Circle to experience a full revival.
I understand the purpose of seminars where we all read the presenter’s paper and help them think things through. I’ve benefited from those.
But imagine a Learning Circle where we all read one chapter of a book or ONE published article and share what we learned deom it?
*from it*
Personally, I learn a lot more from conversing and discussing the material than from being a relatively passive information consumer at a seminar.
One article or book chapter a week, 45 minutes of group discussion. This would be real nourishing food for my brain.
Side note: I stole 30 minutes of the busy schedules of @AdrienneStrong and @BeatriAnthro (each) this week and learned SO MUCH from these brief conversations about #HospitalEthnography. Just so enriching. I want more of that. Focused Learning Sessions.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Iniciamos! El Dr. Mushfiq Mobarak hablará sobre su proyecto de normalización de uso de mascarilla en Asia del Sur, que se está replicando y escalando en América Latina). #ConversacionesMetodológicas
Sigan la conversación en Facebook Live de FLACSO México
Necesitamos reducir transmisión de COVID19 mientras que no haya mayoría de personas vacunadas. Por lo mismo, una intervención viable económicamente, es el uso de mascarilla (es obviamente una intervención de varias, debemos usarlas todas) #ConversacionesMetodológicas
THREAD: on how you can identify Conceptual Saturation and how you can converge on a topic or theme:
I’ve been reading on #HospitalEthnography for a while now. Recently, I’ve converged on a topic: access to field sites and gate-keeping. Relevant to my project on fieldwork.
These 3 articles give me ideas for a #MorningParagraphs: what are some of the issues that arise with regards to access to hospital wards as sites for field research - and what are the ethics of said access?
I outlined some ideas in a blank piece of paper.
What I did with these notes is that I mapped out which authors I could or should cite for each one of these ideas (see dribbles in pink)
I added a few even if they aren’t explicitly on nurses as gatekeepers because these citations DO provide insight on this topic too.
THREAD: On shared databases, literature reviews materials and Conceptual Synthesis Excel Dumps (CSED), Mendeley and Dropbox folders for a laboratory or a coauthorship.
You may recall that a few weeks ago, I asked you if you used any of my techniques and whether you shared stuff
When I had my own lab, @CoReGovLab, I used to share Dropbox folders, Mendeley folders/groups and CSEDs with my research assistants and my coauthors. That was/is part of the deal with me: if you work with me, we may want to implement my methods (for both of our sakes)
I am at a different institution now, BUT I still believe in the power of sharing the same methods, heuristics, files and approaches to doing research.
I am currently co-editing a book with @Pran_eeta which means we're going to have to share CSEDs, Mendeley and Dropbox folders.
Hilo para mi Twitter hispanoparlante: me han preguntado en cursos y talleres y mis estudiantes cómo es que decido si tomo apuntes en mi Libreta de Todo (Everything Notebook), Nota Cornell, una Ficha de Trabajo o en mi Excel Dump de Síntesis Conceptual. Mis reglas son flexibles.
En general, TODAS mis lecturas pasan a un renglón del Excel Dump, aunque sea solamente mis apuntes en los márgenes de la Lectura Rápida AIC.
El asunto se complica cuando noto que un artículo o capítulo lo tengo que leer más a profundidad. Este es un ejemplo:
OIGAN... prometí que iba a tratar de tuitear más sobre mis temas de investigación. Me quedé pensando en que un tema sobre el que puedo hacer un hilo es “ecología política y ecología política urbana para el estudio de conflictos socioambientales”
Pues aquí va. Primero que nada quiero observar que tengo una formación interdisciplinaria, lo cual hace que no piense por disciplina sino por área temática y por lo que me contribuye cada cosa que estudio. Soy ingeniero químico, tengo maestría en economía y mi doctorado es...
... doble en ciencia política y geografía humana. Si bien me especializo en temas ambientales, mi investigación es fundamentalmente sobre política pública comparada. Obviamente, como me interesa mucho la parte metodológica, también hago métodos múltiples (cuant-cual-mixtos)
THREAD: answering the “how do we decide whether to write an Index Card, a Cornell Note, an entry in my Everything Notebook, etc.”
I get asked this question all the time (by my students and/or workshop participants).
I don’t have hard and fast rules. Here’s an example.
This article is one that I have decided is worth reading in depth (see my triaging strategy raulpacheco.org/2019/08/triagi…)
As a general rule, the first step for me when I read is to do a quick AIC content extraction +CSED entry row raulpacheco.org/2017/12/carvin…
Because I've chosen this as an article I'm going to read in much depth, I need to first decide how much time I'm going to spend on it and how I can systematize what I am going to learn from it.
First step: go through the headings and list them. This gives me the paper structure