THREAD: "Revolución" was trending, so I thought I should help my fellow Americans understand how the Cuban regime requires and pressures its people, particularly students, to attend these fake pro-dictatorship rallies.
In Cuba, graduates don't just apply to jobs. The government assigns you one and those who rank highest in the "escalafón" (most revolutionary) get more choices. Many pick career tracks with opportunities to defect.
If you refuse to attend rallies that are of special importance to the regime (like today's), you will be placed under a "periodo de evaluación" (evaluation period).
This sucks because it means the faculty will monitor you more closely for anti-government activity. #SOSCuba
This "evaluation period" can include faculty interrogations, getting on the s*** list of state security agents and being summed the UJC (Union of Young Communists).
Each member of every graduating class *must* complete a form to be considered to work at MININT (Ministry of Interior, AKA the domestic spy agency and military).
If MININT selects you, you *must* work for them for 2 years. It's not optional. #SOSCuba#PatriaYVida
So, not only are students required to attend pro-government rallies, attendance actually increases your chances of getting picked to work for the government's state security apparatus.
And, of course, the MININT jobs come with benefits, like better salaries, food, and AC.
The consequences for workers who don't attend rallies are worse.
Cuban workplaces have communist committees that meet regularly to evaluate their coworkers' commitment to the revolution. Non-attendance is documented.
Employees who do not attend rallies are humiliated.
Yes, skipping rallies also hurts your career ascension.
To reach a workplace manager or director, you *must* be a member of the Communist Party and these workplace committees.
And, of course, Communist Party members are required to attend these absurd pro-government rallies.
Finally, it's not just limited to rallies.
In Cuba, managers give their employees pro-government talking points to use on social media. Below is a memo from this week.
And yes, your manager can check your social media accounts to ensure compliance. #SOSCuba
I hope this thread helps more people understand the systemic and institutionalized oppression in Cuba.
Next time you hear of a pro-government rally in Cuba, remember the attendees' livelihoods depend on being there.
They want to control everything that happens inside their country. It's the only LatAm country that hasn't signed up for COVAX, a global vaccine effort with 190 countries. elnuevoherald.com/noticias/mundo…
According to this @elnuevoherald article from February: The Cuban government is not even purchasing vaccines from its allies, like Russia.
Medicine is a huge business and propaganda talking point for the Cuban dictatorship. They don't want to signal their system is inadequate.
.@krystalball and @esaagar seemed genuinely surprised that there are many Cuban Americans who would be willing to risk their lives to free their homeland if it came to that. They may want to try Googling: "Brigade 2506."
The use of force should always be a last resort, but if we're speaking in hypotheticals, of course many would support such an effort if needed.
It's easy to be dismissive of this when you've never lost your country to communism or when you haven't had family members executed.
That said, there's a lot that should be done short of boots on the ground, but it seems like @krystalball, @esaagar and @ggreenwald (who's a mouthpiece for LatAm leftists like Lula, Morales, etc.) know little about U.S. policy toward Cuba. So, let me walk you through it:
It’s worth noting that a lot of Cuban Americans were smeared as “racists” and “conspiracy theorists” by members of the media for correctly noting last year that BLM the org is a Marxist group. They will never receive an apology.
The idea that the Cuban regime is going to voluntarily transfer power is a fantasy. Regime topplings in Cuba have happened in the following ways:
1) Outside forces (1898, US help) 2) Military / Coup (1933 & 52, Machado & Batista) 3) Mass Uprising (1933 & 1959, Machado & Castro)
2021 Cuba is very different than 1959 & 1933 Cuba.
The biggest diff is that the Cuban people are unarmed. In 1933, the student groups that led uprisings resulting in Machado's ousting by the military had guns.
Castro had both guns and international $$$ (thx to the NYTimes).
There is strong support on the island now for toppling the Castro regime. Cubans are tired of living in misery and the only thing they thought (bc of propaganda) they had going for them (health care) has collapsed.
But an unarmed popular uprising faces serious hurdles.
The images that are coming out of Cuba are, in fact, being amplified by Cuban Americans — but they're coming from Cubans who live on the island. None of us do this for money.
Also, at this point, disillusionment with the regime is widespread.
It's difficult to gauge public opinion on the island. Polling is strictly banned. It's been done clandestinely before, and even in 2015 (when econ was better), Raul Castro was divisive and a plurality of Cubans had a negative view of Fidel Castro.
That's only gotten worse.
There are good people on both sides of the Cuba policy debate in South Florida.
The notion that exiles' interests in Cuba are driven by $ is just silly. If anything, the economic interests that support normalization far exceed the traditional Cuban exile community's.
I'm often asked about "Wet Foot Dry Foot," and in discussing it, I find misconceptions, so here's a quick recap:
WFDF was a policy of the Clinton Administration in the 1990s to address the Cuban rafter crisis of 1994. It was supposed to be temporary but lasted until 2017.
Here's how it worked: If a Cuban stepped foot on US soil, regardless of how they entered, they could stay.
Pres. Obama ended this policy in his final days in office in 2017; Pres. Trump did not reinstate it.
Cuban Americans are divided on it. This is from FIU's 2020 poll:
The law provided relief to many Cubans fleeing Castro, but it had unintended consequences. It incentivized human trafficking, thousands died at sea, and it inadvertently relieved internal pressure on the Cuban regime. How? Bc those most likely to flee are most likely to dissent.